Sentences with phrase «wrong ideas because»

Here's part of the problem: Scientists are human, just like you and me, and they occasionally defend wrong ideas because they propagated in a time where some novel but wrong papers / books were written, and seemed right at the time, and the consensus accepted them, because it agreed with their biases.

They follow clearly wrong ideas because they are dumb and gullible.

I think Marissa has the wrong idea, but I am deeply saddened that she probably has the wrong idea because of the teaching of an institution that has been driven by domineering power plays.

Not exact matches

The idea of right and wrong is less central to creating success for their team, partners, and organizations because they realize the infinite spectrum of possibilities that exist.

Instead, they would have bought because they like the idea of BitGold, oblivious to the fact that a good business can be a bad investment at the wrong price, or because they think that someone else will be dumb enough to pay an even higher price in the future.

David encourages you to do your own independent «due diligence» on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong.

However, as an agnostic I believe atheists are still just as bigoted as theists simply because they refuse to still take up the idea they might be wrong.

I've heard lots of arguments about why everything Matt Walsh publishes should be deleted, recycled, and then the hard drives they were deleted from melted down into slag and thrown into an active volcano to ensure that none of his radical ultra-conservative garbage is ever recovered, but all of them seem to center around the idea that because he is condescending, he is wrong.

To attack a proposal as supposedly being wrong simply because it is spoken by Someone the Speaker does not like is argumentum ad hominem, is logically invalid, and strongly suggests said Speaker has no real way discrediting the * ideas * put forth in said proposal.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

I can see how one can look at this idea and look at the following examples in Hebrews 11 as «Because they were sure they would get this reward, they did this thing» but as the author points out in verse 39 that they didn't get what they imagined they would, so if we understand faith as «being sure» it would turn out that it is «being sure» of something and being totally wrong — instead it makes more sense to understand Hebrews 11:1 as saying that «faith is a realization (or actualization)» of our hopes, a realization that the author points out is greater than we could expect and be sure in.

He seems obsessed with the idea that because people don't all agree with him on issues such as gay marriage that it is essential we all look to the bible to figure out what's ethical and moral, and all assume that it is the final word on what's right or wrong.

Creationists» tactics also have a more profound impact on science education which goes beyond biology because they communicate the idea that there is something lacking or something wrong with evolutionary theory, an idea which is not actually true from a scientific standpoint.

So while you may choose to bow out and ignore some interesting ideas, because the topic is too emotional for you, and there's nothing wrong with that), you can not tell others to do the same.

Don't get me wrong, I agree the market is far from perfect and my idea is a little callous because people would first have to suffer in order for it to right itself.

But if you want to introduce a whole new criticism that you don't believe the Bible is what Christians believe it is, you are of course also wrong, and simply blindly railing against the idea of religious authority and expertise because, God forbid someone else suggest to you what is right or divinely inspired because that might limit your imaginary freedom and insult your nonexistent expertise and intelligence.

His statement that one «can not prove that an idea is wrong simply because Hitler embraced it» is irrelevant in the face of such tortured logic.

I feel sorry for you that because YOU can't control yourself, you would push YOUR idea of what is right on people that are not only not doing anything wrong, but expressing love, and bonding with a child, giving that child nourishment.

He's simply claiming that atheists must be wrong because he doesn't like the idea of people creating their own meaning, or imagining their own basis for rationality, or finding their own purposes for doing positive things for their loved ones.

the idea here, as I understand it, is that we are made in a certain way, and when things hurt it's because somethings wrong, like you say — «I find that if I ignore that part (the creative part) of me for too long, then I begin to suffer.»

While his nonviolent protests did bring about the Civil Rights movement and led to ending the wrongs of Segregation, one of the unintended consequences of such has produced Black hoodlums across America, many of whom have the idea they do not have to obey the laws of the land because their ancestors were slaves.

Because the idea of being completely wrong half the time kinda goes against the whole omnipotent thing...

How can an idea be «wrong» if its origin is a being whose might makes him right (he's automatically right because he's the biggest — god) and thus his morality is subjective because he can do anything and it be «right» regardless of if he says that we shouldn't do it because it's wrong?

The idea of god and satan in Abrahamic faiths is what we call the «barnum effect» because it can never be wrong!

I'm not saying spending on the OL is a bad idea, or that you are wrong at all, because I do agree with your basic premise.

I'm not someone who wave away people's opinion and idea because what i see as completely wrong others see as completely right.

Yes we have improved we have become more aware we have started to show some maturity when facing the top dogs and that's the difference between us this season and us getting SMASHED by all of the top teams last season and if you watch football you can see that the city side are not a patch on their former selves nor Liverpool nor even chelski, we are NOT another 49 unbeaten squad not yet and not for a while until the improvements are made, Yea credit where its due of course but lets NOT RUN AWAY WITH THE IDEA WE ARE WORLD BEATERS JUST YET EH, AKB's are the reason we'll never improve as a fan base because they can see NO wrong in anything the board or AW does, Im no AOB but I do see the need for self criticism and improvement and at BIGGUN its not a ridiculous statement at all we have improved but they have also been off the ball and that why we're having a good run.

I'm not saying your source is wrong, because I have no idea of knowing, but I don't think that's how they operate.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

My fun money is on Stephen Appiah — but that's simply because I'm stubborn and don't want to admit that my idea might not be wrong — heh heh.

The second most important thing is this: I do not want my daughter or my son to grow up with the idea that there is anything wrong with breastfeeding because there's not.

But just because one 2.5 year old can stay dry at night doesn't mean all of them can, and in fact reinforces the idea that kids who wet the bed past toddlerhood have something «wrong» with them, when many of them simply aren't there developmentally.

Though it might seem a good idea to keep babies away from the harmful environment, it is wrong because it inhibits their ability to develop their own natural resistance and immune thus increasing their tendency of catching allergies and rendering antibacterial treatments less effective when they fall ill.

But again, I don't think that is necessarily wrong because I don't know what I can add to a meeting in which my ideas are not on the table.»

Labour leader accepts he was wrong to pose with the Sun but says voters will back him because ideas matter in politics

If you've ever resisted the idea of purchasing and owning your own dumbbells because they won't be heavy enough or have enough range, Unipack is here to prove you wrong.

Sometimes credit didn't come because, as far as we know, he was wrong: his idea that «tired light» and not an expansion of the universe might be the cause of the lengthening of wavelengths from distant galaxies, or his insistence that galaxy clusters didn't belong to superclusters.

Because as even children know, in science two ideas are not equally worthy of being presented if one of them is wrong.

For me, one of the greatest things that science can [tell you] is to have some idea that you love that you think is beautiful, profound and elegant shown to be wrong, because it opens your mind.

Because his grad school research had gone so easily, he says, he had little idea of the challenges involved in doing good science and had been «too immature» to understand that he required further seasoning: «Chaikoff was right to tell me I needed more training, and I was certainly wrong to end - run him.

Attaching object clauses to attitude verbs such as «know» or «think» is an intensional construction: In the sentence «Fred knows that the conman is from Wiesbaden», substituting the place name is not necessarily legitimate because Fred might have wrong ideas (or no idea at all) about Hessen's capital city.

This is most likely the wrong idea, but because I was so used to my entire body getting a workout from swimming, at the gym, I would work out the entire body as well... from: — seated leg press (90 lbs)-- leg curls (55 lbs)-- hip adductors (85 lbs)-- leg kickbacks (40 lbs)-- ab crunch machine (35 - 40 lbs)-- abdominal twist (30 lbs)-- rowing machine — assisted dips, and the stairmaster all in one session....

I've always had digestive problems and doctors never find anything wrong with me they just give me the usual things for an upset stomach but its not just my stomach that bothers me, I can feel it in my intestines too and lately I've been feeling really sick and just can't take it anymore because it is affecting me in school so I've been searching all over too see what could be the cause of my problem and well everything that is wrong with me that I've searched has ultimately led me to Candida which I had no idea existed.

We have these ideas about «good» and «bad» foods - and we let guilt and shame force us towards the wrong foods, because we think that's what healthy means (reality check: If you're training for a marathon, your «healthy» is going to look a lot different than mine and the mom who's working to get her pre-baby body back!)

I've fallen under the spell of the idea that because something is more expensive and has a brand name, it automatically makes it better, this product just proved me wrong.

Make sure you don't use too many photos of you holding a drink because people may get the wrong idea that you either love alcohol too much or you might be an alcoholic and no one wants to date those.

You're frustrated because you have no idea why it's not working, what you might be doing wrong or how to fix it.

With cases of such importance, it's always a good idea to be reminded every now and then as to how things can go wrong, and justice means that just because a person is guilty of SOMETHING, doesn't mean that it's okay for the State frame them for something

Because until those last 20 minutes, and in particular in the film's second act, Jenkins flirts with a bevy of ideas that feel fresh to the superhero genre, the most scintillating of which is that Diana could be wrong about how to save the world.

Don't get me wrong, just because the idea isn't that original, the story is still entertaining and I was paying attention the entire way.