Sentences with phrase «wrong ideas people»

Not exact matches

When you put an idea out there, ask for pushback — literally invite people to show you where you're missing something or thinking about it wrong.

There's often nothing wrong with what everyone else is doing; it's just that interesting people are innovators, who break conformity to pursue new, exciting, and yes, interesting ideas.

They also let people pursue ideas for new businesses even when they think they are wrong.

«But he's wrong in that, if it's a good idea, there are going to be other people doing it.

«I have no idea, and I think people who think they do are wrong,» responded Vinod Khosla of Khosla Ventures.

«Like any news business, they're challenged and the big challenge we all face, the real frustration, is the idea that people aren't reading newspapers anymore and I think that's really wrong,» Hinds says.

GREENBLATT: Right, well the idea really was is that when you give a gate, every September or October, people have to decide whether they want to lock up for another year or two, when you have monthly liquidity, you're never forcing them to make a decision maybe the wrong time, they can always have their money and it's not a signaling device to say you should have a short time horizon, actually for what we do, you need a long time horizon.

These people know the basics and at the same time they make very basic mistakes like pick wrong keywords, have no idea of landing page is, get involved with companies that offer Google ranking in 24 hours, etc..

I am glad to say that the levels you marked matched the ones I had on my charts almost exactly which proves a few things — there are no levels but more like zones — each person marks them differently without being necessary wrong, and finally, — your lessons / teaching / articles / ideas work and provide real, useful information.

Second there are plenty of people who come to their faith as it were through something more than bible verses its called critical thinking people can critically think their way to the idea that they are rather small beings in a relatively huge universe and that they realize that they can't know everything and leave some things including the nature of the universe to faith and acknowledge it as faith if that's how they see the world fine is there anything particularly wrong with that?

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I don't think people are arguing against the website itself, but the idea it represents, i.e. gender segregation.

You come to a message board, tout your ideas, and then say that people who oppose you have the burden of proof to prove you wrong?

I cintend that the bible also calls us to do the same thing — it calls us to action and then says when we have donr everything we can and there is nothing else we are to stand in faith that it will work out — of course i paraphrase — but wht do people think all christians do is sit on their butts and pray and look pie eyed at the sky - this christian worked her butt of on the streets - and look at Mother Thresa - and other christians working for humanity all over the world - i think athiests have the wrong idea about chtistians...

People might get the wrong idea.

Yes, we do reject the idea of «right» and «wrong» having an existence independent of the perspective of the person making the relevant judgment.

@ # $ Ing wrong... people like you are disgusting, claim that we're idiots for our beliefs and yet, you present no ideas, you simply try to tear others down... well lets hear your «ideas» so i can destroy your idiotic belief

I repeat: I hope I am wrong; but I am, all the same, beginning to wonder if the warm support with which even quite unexpected people in our hierarchy (like Bishop Hollis) greeted the establishment of the Ordinariate this time round (you will remember the hostility with which they squashed a similar but less radical basic idea in the Nineties) was really as wholehearted as it seemed at the time: or were they simply saying what they knew the Pope wanted them to say, but without any real belief in the idea itself?

I think most people who believe in prayer don't have insidious reasons for it... I am open to the idea that I am wrong, but the paranoia of many on this blog is disturbing.

I find that people who are fiercest in their defense of «church» are often those who simply can not handle the idea that (1) their church can do any wrong, and (2) they themselves were wrong in their belief that the church can do no wrong.

He seems obsessed with the idea that because people don't all agree with him on issues such as gay marriage that it is essential we all look to the bible to figure out what's ethical and moral, and all assume that it is the final word on what's right or wrong.

The fact that people continue to suggest otherwise and perpetuate this idea that homosexuality is wrong and attempting to make outcasts of people who identify as gay is unbelievably disgusting and frightening and old - fashioned.

Be prepared for this as it will get worse since those talked about here do nt really know what the Bible says and continue to post other peoples wrong ideas and lies about what it says.

I guess that if your ego doesn't allow you to entertain the idea that you might just be wrong in this then you can die without any such worries of who you may have hurt along the way, but some of us aren't willing to step over people just to get ahead.

I've seen this all or nothing trick and its wrong wrong wrong, just as much as the people that use it think the idea they refute is.

Not having read the Bible, I don't think Jesus would have approved of the wealthy steeling from the poor or the poor steeling from wealthy, that being said their maybe something wrong with the Pope's idea of using the government or some other power to steel / take / tax from one person and give someone else that did not earn it, Rush might be right

Johnson surmises that people at the Vatican got the wrong idea when someone checked for Vatican.xxx and saw «it was reserved by ICM registry.»

Don't get me wrong, I agree the market is far from perfect and my idea is a little callous because people would first have to suffer in order for it to right itself.

But though I am deeply convinced that the ideas and ideals of economism are wrong, I am also quite sure that they are honestly held by persons who are sincere in their Christian beliefs and committed to the wellbeing of humanity.

That some things might be right or wrong «is an idea whose validity is simply denied in countless lives and loves» of people who have persuaded themselves that their ways of pursuing adventure, passion, and experimentation is right for them.

People tend to have this wrong idea that someone sat down and put the Bible together as one would write a novel.

I feel sorry for you that because YOU can't control yourself, you would push YOUR idea of what is right on people that are not only not doing anything wrong, but expressing love, and bonding with a child, giving that child nourishment.

I don't judge people — I will call into question ideas and theologies — but I will not call into question a certain person (unless he has broken the law and needs to answer for that — or has wronged someone and needs to make that right — to that person).

He's simply claiming that atheists must be wrong because he doesn't like the idea of people creating their own meaning, or imagining their own basis for rationality, or finding their own purposes for doing positive things for their loved ones.

This is to say, at no time are God's people to be given the idea that they are living at the wrong time, in the wrong place, on the wrong planet, to be really genuine Christians.

What is wrong with the idea of heaven, hell, blah blah blah is the people who wage wars, kill, maim, insult, and otherwise try to impart their way of life on others all in the name of religion.

«While the discussion board itself was a bad idea, my decision to attack critics who were posting there (I did so by posting under the character «William Wallace II») was an even worse idea,» Driscoll said in his letter Friday, provided to CT. «I was wrong to respond to people the way I did, using the language I used, and I am sorry for it and remain embarrassed by it.»

If the life transforming ideas of the gospel are not flowing through our lives into our words and actions toward others people, we are getting the gospel wrong.

Seriously, I remember when I was in college, there would be these people, called professors, that would even say my answer is wrong and give me points off my test... the nerve of them how dare they not be open to my ideas and beliefs as to how physics work, or what Poe point was, or what actually happen during Roman occupation....

There is nothing wrong with serving this audience, but as a tool for introducing people to ideas is problematic.

But, also, any human with common sense knows that at this time, all religions and creeds known to men - are full of crap and instill separatism among groups of humans as if one is more valuable to God - they guy who supposedly made everyone and everything - separatistic ideas as «my book» my god» «my people» are the most beloved by God are wrong, will be always wrong and all religions are wrong and will always be wrong.

The basis for the Catholic churches contention that abortion is wrong is based on the idea that people have souls.

«I also think it is valuable for people who are inclined to lay trips on congregations to see for themselves that they are far more complex than most of the ideas that are held about them — that many of the ideas about what is wrong with them are just too simple.»

Sweet, nail in coffin... oh wait they have no idea what these people are talking about, it would require intellect, an open mind and the will to admit one is wrong.

But in light of Jonah, we have to say that either he is not saved, or that idea that some people teach is just flat out wrong.

Furthermore, the entire point of my post was to show that even though I am a Christian and do not agree with the atheist view of God (which is to say the idea of the absense of God), I STILL support this soldier in their right to attend the ceremony and NOT have to bow their head, and believe that any Christian or other person who would force this soldier to do so by threat of removal from the ceremony, is just plain wrong.

Your definition of «challenging» a person is very much based on this idea of the Bible not at all being wrong, but the READER somehow being wrong.

No, what is wrong with this country is the intolerance that supposedly enlightened people have for the ideas of others.

The idea that everyone is wrong except for you about God hardly seems like a solid argument for criticizing another person's skepticism.

What's wrong with two people recognizing that staying together for the rest of their lives is a bad idea and taking appropriate action?

I have no idea what goes wrong in other people's kitchens, but these cookies are to DIE FOR!