Sentences with phrase «wrong interpretations of»

In couples therapy and couples retreats, Gal helps couples pay attention to their body language, using the body to discover what is really being communicated to each person, along with correcting wrong interpretations of those messages.

Thus, while I am very much on board with Roberts» overall project, I am enough of a practicing lawyer to wonder whether comparative international law can allow us to assess right and wrong interpretations of international law, and whether government intervention should affect such judgments of even relative legal correctness.

[127] Whether an appeal route exists by agreement or by leave of the court on a question of law, a main form of justice that a court can provide is to correct wrong interpretations of the law by arbitrators.

Today we have mislabeled the Sinai Covenant as the Law and gotten into all sorts of wrong interpretations of scripture because of it.

Appreciate your efforts in understanding the vast vedic dharma though as most of them here in Bharat (India) already are filled with many wrong interpretations of vedic dharma.

The error arises from a wrong interpretation of the obvious fact that everybody wants to be a self, to have a sense of the value of his or her selfhood, and to realize, so far as may be, the potentialities given in that selfhood.

The Bible presupposes a right and a wrong interpretation of Jesus» coming and the nature and character of God, as it uses strong language against false teachers who promote doctrines that undermine the gospel.

On the scoreboard it indicates that the team with 0 was in possession of the football on that play, and I made the wrong interpretation of that.

Wrong interpretation of Agatha Christie's work.

It is shown that this estimate is based on a wrong interpretation of the literature, a confusion of short - term with long - run costs, and a selection of worst - case assumptions and parameters.

An estimated 15 million tons of food is wasted annually in the European Union, and 15 percent of that is caused by «the wrong interpretation of best before dates,» according to Sharon Dijksma, minister for agriculture in the Netherlands.

According to Davis, «You can't decide one without the other; it is wholly illogical and, we happen to think, the wrong interpretation of the treaties.»

The seminal reason why the BCCA view is the wrong interpretation of Snell is because the SCC said so in, in so many words, in 2003 in K.L.B. v. British Columbia, 2003 SCC 51, [2003] 2 SCR 403.

In the meantime, I want to get suitable advice as to how I should go further in the matter, in case IMG still dwell on wrong interpretation of the term «accident».

Even a minor mistake can lead to wrong interpretation of the information you wish to provide and ultimately, cause a rejection in the selection procedure.

All it takes is a few clicks and the wrong interpretation of those details can mean the difference between getting a recruiter to call you or not.

«I think part of the problem with the terminology is people don't always understand it or they have the wrong interpretation of what something means, so if what we're talking about is decision - making, why don't we actually use terms to describe what is happening and call it shared decision - making or primary decision - making?»

Not exact matches

Of course, that would be the wrong interpretation.

If sceince contradicts Scripture, it is because the sceince is wrong, or the interpretation of Scripture is wrong (or both are wrong).

The Bible and the Quran have always been and will always be open to interpretation, but when people start killing others in that religions name, or start denying others their rights in the name of religion, something is badly wrong.

Jesus spoke against the bible, said it is wrong, and man's interpretations of the bible is wrong!

I can introduce you to many experts of bible interpretation who will swear that you are wrong.

Have Christians ever persecuted other Christians with the «wrong» interpretation of Christianity?

But there is a different interpretation: that when someone says, «The Church teaches that X is intrinsically wrong,» he is probably being a bit of a Pharisee.

But truth is, that both can be profoundly wrong in their concepts or interpretations of the subject; and even if there was a third person, truth does not fall on any automatically.

There are two ways to get interpretation of scripture (as you said right and wrong).

Whatever else is said was to challenge the article based on it own interpretations of the bible and how it motivated killers based on a double standard of right and wrong.

It is just your interpretation of God's will, so don't be so presumptous to speak for God when you could be wrong about your interpretation and be misleading millions just like Camping, making yourself into the very person you opposed and judged.

Further realist... your sites interpretation of Gods center of Women in the bible is totally wrong.

Like most wrong interpretations is usually and loosely based on a grain of truth but not on the Whole Truth of Jesus Christ the One and Only Son of God.

Considerations such as these invite us to offer an innocuous reading of our text, but to state such an interpretation indicates that we are on the wrong course.

and i will learn trust my own interpretations of what i see, and take whatever steps necessary to expose what i see as wrong.

But we know your interpretation is wrong, because of Passage B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J.

I come to wonder, if what we read out of scripture needs a proper interpretation of it following some basic principals to be in the proper context and we don't follow those simple rules, then what we interpret creates in our minds a false will of God and we follow this so called «Gods will» are we going down the wrong path?

Not only are the Scriptures and the historic interpretation wrong, they are both active purveyors of injustice meted out towards homosexuals.

I would bet even money that those who agree you are wrong could not agree with each other on much else since they are each convinced ot the correctness of their own particular interpretation.

Lincoln, he believes, renewed the theory of statecraft by insisting that «ultimate moral questions did not admit of relativistic interpretations,» while knowing at the same time that the attempt to right moral wrongs may have tragic consequences and almost certainly will not achieve unqualified success.

That theirs is * the * way and the * only * way, with an absolutely literal interpretation of their sacred texts, and a conviction that we, therefore, are inferior people on the wrong side of God.

1) Nobody can quote the scripture you're perverting because you have yet to supply the scripture that explicitly states that homosexuality is wrong; however, one can suggest your perversion of the scripture based on the fact that all popular interpretations of the bible, in regards to the sinfulness of homosexuality, are horse shit.

Second, you couldnt be more wrong about your interpretation of Charles» denomination.

If, nevertheless, historically endless disputes and radical disagreements over the interpretation of the doctrine have in fact arisen, this is one piece of evidence that there is probably something wrong, perhaps self - contradictory, in the basic idea.

Thus, the whole community receives a wrong interpretation away from the intent of the author.

But there are two points I'd like to make here: firstly, we should never, ever reject our children for what we term «disobedience» — Discipline, yes, but rejection, no; secondly, what we deem to be right and wrong, particularly when dictated to by an outside agency like a church, or even our own interpretation of scripture, may not be what is right for them.

But when it comes to some of these other issues, I don't think the question is «who is right and who is wrong» but rather, «does this interpretation help us look more like Jesus?»

No, the point is you've been proven wrong in your uneducated prejudice interpretations of the scriptures and your ego can't handle it.

There are thousands of different interpretations of Christianity, and the people who believe each one are convinced that they are right and everyone else is wrong.

-- however, as it IS my interpretation, I believe it is less wrong than the other options of which I am aware.

There is nothing wrong with this interpretation, and Paul is certainly placing great emphasis on the sacrifice of Jesus in taking on sin and shame.

Much of Marianne's recovery is based on helpful feminist and psychoanalytic interpretations of what is wrong with the conventional female model.

Martin Luther presented the theology of Sola scriptura that the bible is the sole source to live and understand what Christianity is all about... but the bible itself does not come with a table of contents to prove that it is correct which is why the bible itself says that the CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this teaching.