Sentences with phrase «wrong methods of»

So most everyone in the system is happy to just plod along using outdated and totally wrong methods of doing most everything, because that's how they make the most money and are able to do the least amount of work.
Well, you are not the only one who has been following the wrong method of drafting a resume.
If so, is that a sueable offence (for a lawyer to choose the wrong method of remedy through which an action passes through the courts — according to the judge's findings)?

Not exact matches

He has described GM methods, which are employed on around 10 % of the world's arable farmland, as a «gigantic experiment with nature and the whole of humanity which has gone seriously wrong».
It is painfully obvious how wrong this method is if you are a value investor and like to buy things that are out of favor.
There is really no right or wrong way to use shaving soap, as there are a number of different methods that can be used.
The case method is the antithesis of how entrepreneurs build startups — it teaches pattern recognition tools for the wrong patterns — and therefore has limited value as an entrepreneurship teaching tool.
In the practice of Inferential Analytics, the forecasting method we developed and use, we pay rapt attention when gallows humor becomes gallows fact, because it invariably signals that something is seriously wrong.
You asked for «scientific evidence», meaning you asked for something that relies on the principle of your beliefs being able to be challenged, on there being some method of proving your beliefs wrong via some scientific methodology.
All of you «ignorant» Catholics — you have it all wrong when you say the Catholic Church does not believe in contraception - they do in fact — the Vatican approved it in 1951 — Pope Pius XII announced that the Church will sanction the use of the rhythm method as a natural form of birth control.
Over fifty years ago, G. Ernest Wright in The Biblical Archaeology (1955, p 46) said: «It may be noted that the new Carbon 14 method of dating ancient remains has not turned out to be as free from error as had been hoped... Certain runs have produced obviously wrong results, probably for a number od reasons.
I allow myself, by my observer standpoint and scholarly method, to absent myself from any confrontation either in my teaching or in my life with the pressing issues of right and wrong.
James You think that people are opening these meetings with prayer as an «insidious method of identifying those who believe differently than the one leading the prayer» I hope you are wrong.
for example, MLK did not convince Southern conservatives that the Bible is wrong or that they had to radically change their method of interpreting the Bible (hermeneutics).
Such a survey would reveal that the goals and aspirations of politics and religion are usually not wrong, but the means and methods by which political and religious leaders seek to accomplish these goals are way off base.
Posner even indicates some sympathy for those who want to prohibit those other abortions: «I do not mean to criticize anyone who believes, whether because of religious conviction, nonsectarian moral conviction, or simply a prudential belief that upholding the sacredness of human life whatever the circumstances is necessary to prevent us from sliding into barbarism, that abortion is always wrong and perhaps particularly so in late pregnancy, since all methods of late - term abortion are gruesome....
You see the issue is not one of wrong application of the scientific method.
Wrong, the nature of the conversations on this blog are both philosophical AND scientific however, this paticular story regarding proof of god completely ignore the scientific method.
The magazine was right in saying that Niebuhr was essentially a liberal, but it was wrong in reducing theological liberalism to a method, for liberalism manifestly had doctrines and presuppositions of its own.
Certainly we must recognize the importance of the attempt to keep the moral sense alive even in war, but this method which seeks to distinguish always between a «right» and a «wrong» tends toward the subtle hypocrisy of self - justification.
When he was scarcely fifteen years old, the great thought took possession of him that the ancient method of studying nature was wrong and that he was meant to right it.
drkstrong on March 15, 2011 @MsSpeakersCorner No body say it was impossible to use the sciiftenic method there just cant ever be proof of a theory because there is always the possibility of a new observation that will show it to be wrong.
It was easy for me, then, to become cynical about the faith that I was raised in, to punch the holes into the theology of the people I grew up with and spot the gaps in the preaching and methods, and point a finger of blame when «they» got it wrong, to separate myself from the culture and, like most kids raised by immigrant parents (because, in a way, my parents were like immigrants to this strange new land of Christianity), I took for granted my life in the new Kingdom, completely unable to imagine a life without freedom, without joy, without Jesus.
The careful historian, we would maintain, is bound to come up against the traces of this revelation, and where they are obscured it is a sign that there is something wrong with his historical methods.
And that's where most modern, kind of delivery - method type education gets it wrong.
And yet you are sure, as I am sure, that were the world confined to these hard - headed, hard - hearted, and hard - fisted methods exclusively, were there no one prompt to help a brother first, and find out afterwards whether he were worthy; no one willing to drown his private wrongs in pity for the wronger's person; no one ready to be duped many a time rather than live always on suspicion; no one glad to treat individuals passionately and impulsively rather than by general rules of prudence; the world would be an infinitely worse place than it is now to live in.
«To suggest we can't know how old the Earth is, then, is to deny the validity of these scientific methods altogether» - No it's to be open minded to the idea that we might be wrong, on the other hand to accept these dates without question or reservation is to accept current science without question.
B. «The Catholic Church has always taught that using artificial methods of contraception is wrong... Some Catholics, following their conscience, disagree with the Church's teaching and use contraception».
If there was something terribly wrong with our methods I think Ozil would be one of the most unlucky one's.
Thought wenger was meant to be the master of diet and training methods, were doing something very wrong and Chelsea are bread strong
Wenger's training methods and positioning of players are now been criticised by players themselves, this is a worrying step in the wrong direction.
We do nt need massed amounts of money we can spend about half whats in the bank (200m +) to complete our squad and with an ambitious owner who will spend THE CLUBS MONEY... 2nd, a manager who will spend the money that isnt a liar, deluded or arrogant to a level where he can do no wrong ever from the powers above or change his methods / ways just to prove he can and is punishing the fans with all his BS ober the years.
This trend, along with the sheer un-Mourinhoness of this season, suggests that while his methods may be generally excellent, he doesn't quite know how to fix things when they go wrong.
I am not saying this is right or wrong, people are different and different methods work... but if you can't even get to your method then you are drastically increasing the chance of failure.
I feel that it's wrong beacuse there is a system which is breaking Arsenal, it's combination of ambition, training method, tactics, desire and most important off all is that, I believe is players are not allowed to play to their potential / strengths.
Coaches are paid to produce results on the pitch and yo win trophies for the team.If a coach fails those basic things then he is not go enough and must leave.Sucess or failure comes down to the decisions of the coach ranging from decisions in the transfer market, training methods, team selection, tactics etc.Looking @ the transfer market - Wenger has a shambolic record - failure to act decisively and always acting when it's too late, selling our top players to rival clubs, leaving other positions thin and reinforcing wrong positions especially buying lots of attacking midfielders ignoring defensive positions and failing to buy top class strikers or decent strikers.If Wenger is really serious about winning trophies would he buy a player like Welbeck a fourth choice play at Man United whom Vaan Gaal said is only good for the bench and now he plays every game at Arsenal.Why sell Vemaleen and buy Chambers?
Alfie Kohn had an interesting article in the NYT this past week on how parents can use discipline as a method of control and not as a way to teach right from wrong.
There is nothing wrong with finding the method of transport that works best for parent, as well as baby.
There's not a correct method, and if you do something differently than a member of your family or best friend is doing, that doesn't mean you're making bad decisions or letting anything go wrong for your child.
The main thing I like about the babyled weaning method is that it makes eating solids not a set goal that can be done a right way or a wrong way, but instead a process of going from baby - who - drinks - milk - only to child - who - eats - food in a slow and self - paced way.
Mothers feel like they have been stripped of their right to make their own decisions about feeding methods and this is just wrong!
I wasn't a fan of the 2 - shirt method because tank tops made me feel squeezed and squished in all the wrong places.
Remember that although the «rules» for offering baby food are much looser these days, there was nothing really wrong with the classic method of starting with rice cereal, so you can still do that.
However, there's much more to it than you'd think, and the wrong methods can stimulate instead of relax — oops!
Neither of these methods are right or wrong — it all depends on what works best for you and your family.
The method may seem a bit out there, but thousands of years of medical expertise can't be wrong, right?
When You Have Tried for a Year — «Not only are you now in a the new category of «infertile», you have to deal with people telling you that you are doing something wrong and need to try their method
He soon realised that there was something inherently wrong with the traditional methods of delivering babies, with their emphasis on intervention and the extensive use of anaesthetics.
It's not an inherently wrong system, it's just unrealistic to believe that a society will overwhelmingly accept any method of measuring one's contributions to it.
«There is no reason for such an appointment when there are scientists of every political stripe who adhere to the scientific method, have the humility to accept when they are wrong and would be willing to serve their country if asked by an incoming president.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z