So most everyone in the system is happy to just plod along using outdated and totally
wrong methods of doing most everything, because that's how they make the most money and are able to do the least amount of work.
Well, you are not the only one who has been following
the wrong method of drafting a resume.
If so, is that a sueable offence (for a lawyer to choose
the wrong method of remedy through which an action passes through the courts — according to the judge's findings)?
Not exact matches
He has described GM
methods, which are employed on around 10 %
of the world's arable farmland, as a «gigantic experiment with nature and the whole
of humanity which has gone seriously
wrong».
It is painfully obvious how
wrong this
method is if you are a value investor and like to buy things that are out
of favor.
There is really no right or
wrong way to use shaving soap, as there are a number
of different
methods that can be used.
The case
method is the antithesis
of how entrepreneurs build startups — it teaches pattern recognition tools for the
wrong patterns — and therefore has limited value as an entrepreneurship teaching tool.
In the practice
of Inferential Analytics, the forecasting
method we developed and use, we pay rapt attention when gallows humor becomes gallows fact, because it invariably signals that something is seriously
wrong.
You asked for «scientific evidence», meaning you asked for something that relies on the principle
of your beliefs being able to be challenged, on there being some
method of proving your beliefs
wrong via some scientific methodology.
All
of you «ignorant» Catholics — you have it all
wrong when you say the Catholic Church does not believe in contraception - they do in fact — the Vatican approved it in 1951 — Pope Pius XII announced that the Church will sanction the use
of the rhythm
method as a natural form
of birth control.
Over fifty years ago, G. Ernest Wright in The Biblical Archaeology (1955, p 46) said: «It may be noted that the new Carbon 14
method of dating ancient remains has not turned out to be as free from error as had been hoped... Certain runs have produced obviously
wrong results, probably for a number od reasons.
I allow myself, by my observer standpoint and scholarly
method, to absent myself from any confrontation either in my teaching or in my life with the pressing issues
of right and
wrong.
James You think that people are opening these meetings with prayer as an «insidious
method of identifying those who believe differently than the one leading the prayer» I hope you are
wrong.
for example, MLK did not convince Southern conservatives that the Bible is
wrong or that they had to radically change their
method of interpreting the Bible (hermeneutics).
Such a survey would reveal that the goals and aspirations
of politics and religion are usually not
wrong, but the means and
methods by which political and religious leaders seek to accomplish these goals are way off base.
Posner even indicates some sympathy for those who want to prohibit those other abortions: «I do not mean to criticize anyone who believes, whether because
of religious conviction, nonsectarian moral conviction, or simply a prudential belief that upholding the sacredness
of human life whatever the circumstances is necessary to prevent us from sliding into barbarism, that abortion is always
wrong and perhaps particularly so in late pregnancy, since all
methods of late - term abortion are gruesome....
You see the issue is not one
of wrong application
of the scientific
method.
Wrong, the nature
of the conversations on this blog are both philosophical AND scientific however, this paticular story regarding proof
of god completely ignore the scientific
method.
The magazine was right in saying that Niebuhr was essentially a liberal, but it was
wrong in reducing theological liberalism to a
method, for liberalism manifestly had doctrines and presuppositions
of its own.
Certainly we must recognize the importance
of the attempt to keep the moral sense alive even in war, but this
method which seeks to distinguish always between a «right» and a «
wrong» tends toward the subtle hypocrisy
of self - justification.
When he was scarcely fifteen years old, the great thought took possession
of him that the ancient
method of studying nature was
wrong and that he was meant to right it.
drkstrong on March 15, 2011 @MsSpeakersCorner No body say it was impossible to use the sciiftenic
method there just cant ever be proof
of a theory because there is always the possibility
of a new observation that will show it to be
wrong.
It was easy for me, then, to become cynical about the faith that I was raised in, to punch the holes into the theology
of the people I grew up with and spot the gaps in the preaching and
methods, and point a finger
of blame when «they» got it
wrong, to separate myself from the culture and, like most kids raised by immigrant parents (because, in a way, my parents were like immigrants to this strange new land
of Christianity), I took for granted my life in the new Kingdom, completely unable to imagine a life without freedom, without joy, without Jesus.
The careful historian, we would maintain, is bound to come up against the traces
of this revelation, and where they are obscured it is a sign that there is something
wrong with his historical
methods.
And that's where most modern, kind
of delivery -
method type education gets it
wrong.
And yet you are sure, as I am sure, that were the world confined to these hard - headed, hard - hearted, and hard - fisted
methods exclusively, were there no one prompt to help a brother first, and find out afterwards whether he were worthy; no one willing to drown his private
wrongs in pity for the
wronger's person; no one ready to be duped many a time rather than live always on suspicion; no one glad to treat individuals passionately and impulsively rather than by general rules
of prudence; the world would be an infinitely worse place than it is now to live in.
«To suggest we can't know how old the Earth is, then, is to deny the validity
of these scientific
methods altogether» - No it's to be open minded to the idea that we might be
wrong, on the other hand to accept these dates without question or reservation is to accept current science without question.
B. «The Catholic Church has always taught that using artificial
methods of contraception is
wrong... Some Catholics, following their conscience, disagree with the Church's teaching and use contraception».
If there was something terribly
wrong with our
methods I think Ozil would be one
of the most unlucky one's.
Thought wenger was meant to be the master
of diet and training
methods, were doing something very
wrong and Chelsea are bread strong
Wenger's training
methods and positioning
of players are now been criticised by players themselves, this is a worrying step in the
wrong direction.
We do nt need massed amounts
of money we can spend about half whats in the bank (200m +) to complete our squad and with an ambitious owner who will spend THE CLUBS MONEY... 2nd, a manager who will spend the money that isnt a liar, deluded or arrogant to a level where he can do no
wrong ever from the powers above or change his
methods / ways just to prove he can and is punishing the fans with all his BS ober the years.
This trend, along with the sheer un-Mourinhoness
of this season, suggests that while his
methods may be generally excellent, he doesn't quite know how to fix things when they go
wrong.
I am not saying this is right or
wrong, people are different and different
methods work... but if you can't even get to your
method then you are drastically increasing the chance
of failure.
I feel that it's
wrong beacuse there is a system which is breaking Arsenal, it's combination
of ambition, training
method, tactics, desire and most important off all is that, I believe is players are not allowed to play to their potential / strengths.
Coaches are paid to produce results on the pitch and yo win trophies for the team.If a coach fails those basic things then he is not go enough and must leave.Sucess or failure comes down to the decisions
of the coach ranging from decisions in the transfer market, training
methods, team selection, tactics etc.Looking @ the transfer market - Wenger has a shambolic record - failure to act decisively and always acting when it's too late, selling our top players to rival clubs, leaving other positions thin and reinforcing
wrong positions especially buying lots
of attacking midfielders ignoring defensive positions and failing to buy top class strikers or decent strikers.If Wenger is really serious about winning trophies would he buy a player like Welbeck a fourth choice play at Man United whom Vaan Gaal said is only good for the bench and now he plays every game at Arsenal.Why sell Vemaleen and buy Chambers?
Alfie Kohn had an interesting article in the NYT this past week on how parents can use discipline as a
method of control and not as a way to teach right from
wrong.
There is nothing
wrong with finding the
method of transport that works best for parent, as well as baby.
There's not a correct
method, and if you do something differently than a member
of your family or best friend is doing, that doesn't mean you're making bad decisions or letting anything go
wrong for your child.
The main thing I like about the babyled weaning
method is that it makes eating solids not a set goal that can be done a right way or a
wrong way, but instead a process
of going from baby - who - drinks - milk - only to child - who - eats - food in a slow and self - paced way.
Mothers feel like they have been stripped
of their right to make their own decisions about feeding
methods and this is just
wrong!
I wasn't a fan
of the 2 - shirt
method because tank tops made me feel squeezed and squished in all the
wrong places.
Remember that although the «rules» for offering baby food are much looser these days, there was nothing really
wrong with the classic
method of starting with rice cereal, so you can still do that.
However, there's much more to it than you'd think, and the
wrong methods can stimulate instead
of relax — oops!
Neither
of these
methods are right or
wrong — it all depends on what works best for you and your family.
The
method may seem a bit out there, but thousands
of years
of medical expertise can't be
wrong, right?
When You Have Tried for a Year — «Not only are you now in a the new category
of «infertile», you have to deal with people telling you that you are doing something
wrong and need to try their
method.»
He soon realised that there was something inherently
wrong with the traditional
methods of delivering babies, with their emphasis on intervention and the extensive use
of anaesthetics.
It's not an inherently
wrong system, it's just unrealistic to believe that a society will overwhelmingly accept any
method of measuring one's contributions to it.
«There is no reason for such an appointment when there are scientists
of every political stripe who adhere to the scientific
method, have the humility to accept when they are
wrong and would be willing to serve their country if asked by an incoming president.»