Sentences with phrase «wrong model good»

Not only does admitting we've done wrong model good behaviour, it also re-establishes trust.

Not only does admitting we've done wrong model good behaviour, it also re-establishes trust.

Not exact matches

Pre-mortems work best in groups, he adds, because «other people will have different mental models of what could go wrong.»

Don't get me wrong, the capitalist model is far from perfect, it has many problems, but i've never been able to come up with a better system.

It would be easy to assume that ROIC - based models had their chance in the marketplace and failed because they weren't good enough, but that would be wrong.

These rough metrics should approximate a DCF model anyway, and if you demand a large enough margin of safety, roughly right is better than approximately wrong.

It's possible that the DNA could be wrong, or that the reenactment models could be off, but in the absence of any actual eyewitness (and even that testimony is not as reliable as once assumed) testimony to an event it is the best we have to go on, right?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Sadly, she is wrong in believing that «being a good wife shouldn't be any different than being a good husband»; an overwhelming number of never - married women want a husband who has a steady job (while men say they favor someone who shares their ideas about raising children) and that male - as - provider model most likely perpetuates gendered expectations when it comes to marriage.

Meet up with people in a place your child can play, teach your child about interruption and why it's wrong, schedule your calls to when your child is sleeping, and try to model your child's behavior by setting a good example with your behavior.

Maybe, with modeling, we need to avoid doing or saying things we don't want our children doing or saying, as well as things they might confuse with the wrong behavior.

It's a classic question of Garbage In, Garbage Out: if your data model tells you to aim your ads at the wrong people, even the best targeting techniques aren't going to help you win votes.

Unlike in May 2015 though I've a good idea of what went wrong (the turnout model we used for the poll weighted down people who didn't vote at the last general election, when in reality turnout ended up being higher than the last general election), which is something that can be worked on.

Thinking that I might have a hot story to write about that would reveal something deeply wrong with current cosmological models, I first queried California Institute of Technology cosmologist Kip S. Thorne, who assured me that the discrepancy was merely a problem in the current estimates of the age of the universe and that it would resolve itself in time with more data and better dating techniques.

But these models exhibit biases over tropical continents, showing peak evaporation and photosynthesis rates in the wrong season, as well as rain too early in the day.

Hypochondria is a diagnosis I take great offense to because it ignores the patient's intuition that there is something wrong and often leads to shame, disempowerment, helplessness and destroys the trust we have in the healthcare model and of ever getting well.

As athletes / bodybuilders, my guess is that we do nt fit well into these models based upon average populations - I could be wrong, but I want to find out.

you are really a good model, i am not sure that i said right or wrong that you are model or not, but it seems that you are professional in this field, so cute and good pictures.

There's nothing wrong with a good copy cat outfit Rachel — especially when it's as good as this (bet it looks better on you than their model, anyway)!!

It may well go down as the biggest radiocarbon dating mistake in history; not because there is anything wrong with the measurement process (there may Willard Libby believed he could model the entire world of Carbon 14 by using a grid system.

«I was so well grounded in this work that when I was analyzing data from public websites and bringing proposals, even before I was on the committee, that I knew how to ask for that information through that lens, and having that model gave me a clear sense of what was going right and what was going wrong,» Dexter says.

There was actually not much wrong with the LA model in the first place and what we've got instead is not demonstrably any better and arguably worse.

For all the reasons outlined above, it is well - known and accepted among researchers that a particular individual score produced by a VAM procedure, even on the best developed and administrated model, may be wrong for a variety of reasons.

Where it could go wrong FCA has delayed the launch of the Alfa Giulia, and while Marchionne says the issues are related to the model itself and not its platform, we wonder whether the new Challenger will be delayed as well.

Obviously we would love to be wrong, but our best guess is that the redesigned model you are seeing in spy shots won't arrive until 2017 as a 2018 model year vehicle.

Well with models that are all - fun - to drive and the fact the Lancer has been rated as an Insurance Institute of Highway Safety «Top Safety Pick» for five years in a row, from 2009 to 2013, you really can't go wrong.

THE Honda CIVIC IS BEST IN CLASS Whichever model you choose, it's pretty hard to go wrong with the Civic.

If you thought the 2018 Ford F - 150 lineup didn't have any room for improvement thanks to new offerings like the 2018 Ford F - 150 Diesel model and performance upgrades throughout, well, we're here to tell you you're wrong because the 2018 Ford F - 150 Police Responder has come along and completely blown us away here at Akins Ford near Atlanta, GA..

Under the skin that new C2 Platform promises to be dynamic and absorbing, with most (but not all) models coming with independent rear suspension and Continuously Controlled Damping to adapt to the drive, and there's a lot of safety kit on offer including Level 2 Autonomy from Co-Pilot360 which comes with Adaptive Cruise, Stop - Start, Sign Recognition and Lane Centering, as well as Blind Spot, evasive Steering, Cross Traffic and Wrong way alerts.

I wish they had kept air control functions the same placement from older models I have a 2008 and now a 2016, and I always have a reflex to turn my air function on in the wrong place, because it's been completely moved as well as the radio volume function, which I hate.

BEST IN CLASS: THE Honda CIVICWhichever model you choose, it's pretty hard to go wrong with the Civic.

Realistically look at your driving needs then make your choice — you can't go wrong either way; in fact, the only questionable purchase may be a regular Avalon over the hybrid when the gas / electric model is this good and so reasonably priced.

Sure, there's little wrong with the overall package as it stands, and the non-representative model we sampled drove well.

The company isn't wrong in doing so, as the Super AMOLED displays of both the 8.4 and 10.5 - inch Galaxy Tab S models are some of the best you can expect from a tablet.

There is a need for a well - developed model of how a financial crisis works, so that the wrong cures are not applied to the financial system.

These rough metrics should approximate a DCF model anyway, and if you demand a large enough margin of safety, roughly right is better than approximately wrong.

We also have to grasp that physics is the wrong model for finance, and ecology offers us a better model — actors pursuing scarce resources in order to survive / thrive.

This doesn't mean his model is wrong, but that the odds of it forecasting well in the future are lower because each model adjustment effectively relies on less data as the model gets «tuned» to eliminate past inaccuracies.

... but not at the extent of... well, «been a follower»... It wouldn't be right to be like the rest: — RRB -... and perhaps as you said: «All existing... models are wrong.

That is the thing about science: even if you start out with the wrong model, empirical evidence will eventually correct you, and you'll know why you were wrong, as well.

Stop arguing about who's theory is right or wrong, about the need for more data and better forecasting models.

he just wiped the eggs of his face, chucked his models out and went back to the drawing board, that's a scientist I can respect, science is about good predictability, the facts are never wrong

[Response: I looked into what you could change in the model that would have done better (there is no such thing as a RIGHT / WRONG distinction — only gradations of skill), and I estimated that a model with a sensitivity of ~ 3 deg C / 2xCO2 give the observed forcings would have had higher skill.

It is a good example of a model proven wrong.

Now what if that were wrong — if all proxy reconstructions as well as model simulations of the past millennium were fundamentally in error?

To make matters more difficult, even a simple mechanistic model (AFRC Wheat) containing good science in it sub-modules, struggles if fed less than perfect data : http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/environmental-modelling/Roger%20Payne.pdf Given the imperfect nature of real - world data, could AFRC wheat ever be shown to be wrong?

Of course you may claim that the weather men do produce better forecasts, but that is because they have learnt where the models go wrong, and can adjust their forecast appropriately.

Your AGW - based model gives results well outside experimental error, showing the model is wrong.

* «Princeton physicist Will Happer's WSJ op - ed: «Global warming models are wrong again»: The former federal official calls climate's «observed response» to more CO2 «not in good agreement with model predictions.»»