Sentences with phrase «wrong move which»

Not exact matches

The company moves approximately 10,000 bottles of juice a week, which is too low a volume to get distributors» full attention, resulting in customers receiving the wrong products.

A previous version moved June 13 gave the wrong country in which Scheinberg resides and the wrong first name for Scheinberg's son.

Tech company leaders, in particular, have become more vocal in expressing opposition to the move, which many consider ill - conceived and wrong - headed.

«President Trump is not willing to get this wrong which is why he wants to move forward quickly and protect Americans,» Priebus added.

Progressive religious folks of all stripes tend to share a post-triumphalism (a sense that it's time to move beyond the old triumphalist paradigm in which one religion is The Right Path to God and all the other paths are wrong), as well as an inclination toward reading our sacred texts through interpretive lenses which take into account changing social mores and changing understandings of justice.

This discussion seems to have moved from a discussion on 1 Corinthians 9 (which could be used in a wrong way) to the issue of whether those lead a church should be paid so I offer the above thoughts to restore some balance.

Or forgiveness and promise combine in a treaty or a contract in which the parties acknowledge past misunderstandings and wrongs and mutually pledge to move beyond them.

We see this especially in IVF preimplantation testing, which has now — as reported here at SHS — moved to destroying embryos that test for the wrong sex, hair, and eye color.

Shadowflash, I don't recall your response to any of my posts... I usually do recall them... But I do agree with one thing you said... «human mind hates being wrong» But I see it differently then you do... I see human mind and human understanding being the stumbling block and point of pride, which prevents man from seeing the reality of his real condition, and the need to humble himself in order to be able to see himself as he is, and seek the help of His Creator without whom he is a living, moving shell, yet, without the vital part of him being alive, which would make him complete.

It was a bold move which produced divisive results, the first cracks in a band that the public and critics alike thought could do no wrong.

Of course, it is theoretically a possibility that the Christian Religion for two thousand years has been moving along the wrong line, and that another, and what might be called by some a better, understanding of the meaning of Christianity will take the place of that which has been conventional among us through these centuries.

i long with you david... and i myself stumble in my own awkward efforts toward freedom, and as you said, we know the fact is that it is scary to move into freedom... because it is unknown... but i see so many on this newfound road to freedom get trapped in the liminal space of wish - fullfillment community (which actually rather looks like affinity rather than the hard - won community that comes from communitas)... i'm sure this is going to come off the wrong way, but i'm going to say it anyway: many of the comments seem to be «all about me», and truly that is what religion is... but not freedom, not the mission of Jesus where you die to yourself by taking up your cross daily... not being centered on the «other» rather than yourself...

Remember: there's no such thing as a wrong move when it comes to noodle salad dressings — if anything, this is a great time to experiment with different ratios to figure out which flavors you like.

Organic farmers and others are praising Vermont's move, while the Washington, D.C. - based Grocery Manufacturers Association, which represents food producers, called it a step in the wrong direction.

if he gets Mahrez, he won't get Lacazette and Mahrez is not a striker, I might be wrong but I think Wenger just wants one of them to appease fans craving for a big move... unless you are 100 % sure Mahrez is just a rumour which I don't think it is..

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

even when he suffered a serious knee injury, instead of accepting the fact that he would never stick his legs into the spaces that were crucial for someone with straight ahead speed to succeed, the club actually contemplated giving him a chance to play up top where his lack of physicality, size and holding up play talents would been on display for all to see... these are not the actions of a club that really cares about winning at the highest levels, but they are the actions of a club that wasn't interested in spending the necessary resources to purchases a world - class striker, which is usually the most expensive position on the pitch... instead we adopted the horrible phrase «like a new signing» and proceeded to allow this ridiculous experiment to carry on, which ultimately caused some discomfort on the training pitch and inside the locker room as players battled for a position that shouldn't have been theirs for the taking in the first place... don't get me wrong, I believe that Walcott is a talented player, who can help a team reach their goals, if their goals are relatively modest... just look at the teams who supposedly expressed interest in his services and they weren't the kind of clubs who aspire to win at the highest levels... as for the reasons why he hasn't been bitching and moaning about moving on just look at the wage benefits he receives from our club and his obvious desire to enjoy the societal advantages that come with playing in North London for a club with worldwide appeal... so instead of continuing to try to fix a coat with a broken zipper simply move on and buy a new and better coat

So you can't use the heat or humidity as an excuse for that defeat, let's just leave it as an experiment which went wrong and move on.

As it stands, this squad is fairly well positioned to compete for the Wenger Cup and make a deep run in the Europa, if and only if we play first stringers in Europe and use the bench for the League and FA Cups... that being said, and based on the fragility of the manager and the team in recent campaigns, it's more likely that Wenger will focus on a top 4 finish and the FA Cup... while the reasons for such an approach may appear logical, it would confirm a rather disturbing trend and appear counter intuitive for any team which claims to have higher aspirations... I feel that Wenger simply can't afford to put all his eggs in the Europa basket because if he fails the potential backlash could cripple any top 4 chances due to the aforementioned fragile psyche that tends to rear it's ugly head like our own personal groundhog day each and every February... furthermore, can you even imagine Wenger bringing in the necessary recruits to adequately supply top quality lineups in a Thursday / Sunday dominated schedule; based on everything I've seen in recent years, I can't see that happening... in fact, mark my words, it's more likely that we see Lacazette playing out wide in Alexis's position with Giroud at striker, than we see Wenger make the necessary moves to right this ship... god, I hope I'm wrong but is it really that far - fetched considering what we've witnessed for past several years

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

he was truly a beast for us, players make wrong moves in their careers in which they struggle to come back from.

He moves too much on the far left leaving the center open which can cause disaster allowing many goes, I saw this with Brazil at the World cup, pipo blames D. Luiz which I say they got it wrong Dante is the man to blame coz he moved too, too much on the far left and did not remind Macelo to keep his position.

«Obviously it's a big thing for me to play for Chelsea especially after I made the move from Forest because a lot of people said I went for the wrong reasons, which wasn't true at the time.

hleb has moved on due to some personal reasons and we should cut the dude some slack because while he played for us, he played his heart and soul out, same goes for flamini and gilberto and henry... lets keep our criticisms on the pitch and remeber that no matter which side is wrong or who is greedy, what counts is how they performed on the pitch and they did that very well... we should be happy we do nt have players that play rubbish on the field when their hearts are not with the club or when they are not satisfied... i personally pay tribute to gilberto, flamini, adebayor (if he leaves) diarra (hope its not too late) and hleb.

I woke up to a nurse requesting that I move into another position because something was wrong with the baby's heartbeat, which I complied with.

We meet Miliband on the day Lord Myners, the former banker and City minister under Gordon Brown, has used a newspaper interview to criticise the candidate's position on progressive taxation as «wrong» and suggest that he has moved away from the «classic centre left», from which elections are won.

To us that move and plan were misplaced and obviously wrong, which government should not stomach.

From the moment you log on to Cerego on a tablet or PC, the software tracks every move you make, learning about you: how long you take to answer questions, how much faster you answer when you've seen a question before, which questions you skip and which questions you get wrong.

But what if taking a «wrong» turn fills you with a sense of guilt and regret, which prevents you from being able to move on?

The third is a bit of a slip in the wrong direction, but the characters really don't matter in this installment, which moves from one plot point to the next, stopping only for exposition, a random bit of usually unsuccessful humor here and there, and revisiting old memories before the gang's climactic return to Vegas.

They have a choice as to which body system pathway to follow at the start but be careful, if they get a question wrong they might end up moving onto a body system they aren't as confident with!

The Esses at the end of the back straight were soon tightened too, and the bridge which you hit if you got them wrong was moved.

I wish they had kept air control functions the same placement from older models I have a 2008 and now a 2016, and I always have a reflex to turn my air function on in the wrong place, because it's been completely moved as well as the radio volume function, which I hate.

As I've said it was a stupid move that put publishers on the wrong side of consumers which while attractive in the short term was incredibly damaging in the medium to long term:

which blog was most popular is out, my traffic moves the wrong way.)

Perhaps that's a lingering snobbery regarding self publishing authors (which is foolish, idiotic and wrong - headed in an age when some of the biggest writers are rapidly moving towards self publishing, are already self publishing or have emerged from the self publishing space).

Tward says there's nothing wrong with the traditional strategy, which is to gradually move into safer income - producing investments as you get close to retiring.

You will usually see traders ask things such as «how should I move my stop loss», «when do you take profit», «which indicator is the best for entries», «how much money do I need and how much can I make», «which timeframe is the best» or «is my indicator setting wrong».

And the Google motto was «Don't Be Evil»... while at Facebook it was «Move Fast & Break Things», which was more akin to «We Promise To Be Slightly Less Evil Each Time Something Goes Horribly Wrong».

However, many other trainers use the wrong training techniques, which lead to negative repercussions that will move you further from your goal.

But it doesn't actually move, which makes me think either they cut the tile to the wrong length or it's a «shaving ledge» to rest your foot on while you shave your legs.

during SP mission Nightshift • Fixed issue with last mission not listed in REPLAY MISSIONS list • Fixed issue on the SP mission Night Shift where three of the marines that repel down from the Osprey at the start of the level have PLR models instead of the right marine models • Has been made harder to fail missions due to zero tolerance friendly fire • Fixed MG nest objective on Operation Guillotine • Fix for music climax on mission «Fear No Evil» • Fixed issues that occurred if user were backtracking after fight at elevator on SP mission «Comrades» • Adding a back button to SP campaign select difficulty screen • Removed slomo from jump into train on SP mission «The Great Destroyer» • Fixed glitches in subway Quick Time Events in mission «The Great Destroyer» • Increased quality of the loading screen images • Fixed glitch that made it possible to reach Solomon train QTE with the wrong weapon equipped in mission «Semper Fidelis» • Fixed final sound fade out on SP mission «Thunder Run» • Removed sound fade on convoy ride in mission «Operation Guillotine» • Fixed squad mates coming through wall after intro on SP mission «Operation Guillotine» • SP mission, «The Great Destroyer»: moved Campaign Cleared achievement until after the Dima outro • Fixed soldiers inside of terrain at start of level in «OPERATION GUILLOTINE» • SP mission, «The Great Destroyer»: Fixed streaming issue which could lead to out of memory when streaming in Subway ride • Improved music and music fade on tank encounter in mission «Operation Guillotine» • Sound on Operation Guillotine: Fixed trading floor crash camera shake and rumble • Fade later when driving in to tunnel on «OPERATION GUILLOTINE» • Hide cross hair during Solomon intro & climb out scene on «Operation Swordbreaker» • Fixes on «OPERATION SWORDBREAKER»: Skip VO urging the player to move forward if the player has already moved.

But enough about Mr. McGrath, it's time to move onto the game itself, and where better to start than with the career mode, which is where things start to go wrong for Offroad in a big way.

PS PLUS finally got blows out of the water by XBOX gold because XBOX gold offered 2 games to XBOX 360 for FREE (literal free not RENTAL) evenif the subscription run out... It's a wrong move by sony to remove yearly titles and reducing ps3 to 2 titles a month in which most of the time 1 could be an indie.

Sometimes the amount of moves available became overwhelming and remembering which button did what sometimes ended in me firing shots in the wrong direction.

However, the player will find themselves often finding the camera in the wrong position which then stops all forward momentum to move the camera into a good position.

It's frequently a struggle to move around in the game, often leaving your character in the wrong position which usually leads to death on higher difficulties.

However, due to the wealth of options available, many of your basic combo moves require simultaneously pressing the attack button and a d - pad direction, which can often lead to executing the wrong move entirely.

On many occasions, instead of moving right I pressed the wrong button and found myself respawning to an earlier point which was a bit frustrating.

While there's nothing wrong with playing the game on a keyboard, the controller gives you the option of moving with both the d - pad and the analog stick, which is very handy since there are some attacks that are easier to dodge moving in the more constrained, very directional controls the d - pad offers while other attacks are easier to dodge using the more free and fluid analog stick controls.