Sentences with phrase «wrong only their conclusions»

This does not mean what Newton and Einstein had discovered was wrong only their conclusions / idea's of how things really were was wrong.

Not exact matches

Mind you that wasn't the only thing you said in that particular thread that led me to the conclusion that attempting to have any real dialogue with you was pointless and I was already well on the way to that point from the countless encounters of you avoiding questions and offering nothing more to support your stance than «I'm right and you're wrong» or «read it again, it's clear».

For this «scholar» to propose such an interpretation is as intelligent as a chemist who choses to only examine part of a balanced equation because if he considers the whole equation... it might tell him something he does nt want to know or may prove him to be wrong for his «conclusions»....

I have come to the conclusion the only thing wrong with AFC, is people have got no balls.

This discussion is foregone conclusion, the only thing is that arsenal are slowly going into downward - spiral and AVB during 2013 was wrong same statement now it is the truth.

You only have to have read the things Coq and Wenger have said this year to understand what happened and the conclusion of this article to be wrong.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

Our findings suggest that the way that data has been analysed might not have only led to the wrong conclusion that bilinguals have superior inhibition abilities, it might have also contributed to these replication failures.

Confirmation would have been exciting, but negative results pointed only toward the conclusion that his idea was wrong.

While these are not diagnostic and can lead people to wrong conclusions about how diet affects them (underlying sensitivities can fade with time, for example, and an irritant may only be present in certain varieties), if there is something in your diet that is causing inflammatory symptoms at present, a trial - and - error approach may be able to modify your diet into something that doesn't cause these symptoms.

A man finds he has been wrong at every preceding stage of his career, only to deduce the astonishing conclusion that he is at last entirely right.

But if the increase to $ 60 happened only in the last year, you would come to the wrong conclusion.

ok n4rc he says xbox sold 84 million and we all know that there was over 20 million that went wrong and most xbox owners had to buy another one or another 5 or more there is first point second xsbox owners can only ever quote halo or gears or forza as they are the only games that sell well on xbox and as for more games sold on xbox how does he come to this conclusion there is far more variety of games on the ps3 and more people buy on psn than live since live has mostly old g...

Pachauri derided the conclusions, which were not peer reviewed, as «schoolboy science,» only to have it revealed soon afterward that the panel's own conclusions on the glaciers were wrong, and based on the equivalent of scientific hearsay.

So, yes, you're right not really scientific, more like an intuitive conclusion; it may be only another 100 - 200 years if man's influence is smaller than I personally believe or I could be just plain wrong.

If they don't exist then I can only come to the likely conclusion that you are completely wrong.

A true scientific mindset appreciates not only the fact that consensus may point to a clear conclusion, but also the potential that it might be wrong.

But in any case peer - review is only the first stage in a paper becoming widely accepted — after it is published people will consider its conclusions, methodology etc. and if they think it wrong there are, as I said, mechanisms for challenging it in the peer - reviewed press.

It is only when a paper under review has the wrong conclusions (and when despite having given it the thumbs down a journal still thinks they might publish some shocking piece of work) that it becomes necessary to dig a bit deeper and discredit the science fundamentals.

If I am wrong about this, then the only possible conclusion left is that they do indeed impinge upon one another, but like a bicycle wheel, the «back radiation» would necessarily have to act to cool the outbound surface radiation since the back radiation can not be of an energetic state greater than the outbound surface radiation.

The only possible conclusion is that the equation (34) is totally wrong when it is presented as a third equation with equations (32) and (33).

Rather what I'm saying by analogy is regardless of whether the math is right or wrong, the conclusion itself doesn't follow because the inference from low to high resolution only works in one direction and Marcott has the direction reversed.

The same jumping to (wrong) conclusions was made by others, comparing temperature trends with the variability of the year by year increase of CO2: these have a quite good correlation, as there is a short term response of CO2 increase speed to temperature changes, but a only a small influence of temperature on the CO2 trend itself.

... Because if there are none, we're still left with «maybe yes, maybe no», with no one group really able to declare another's conclusions (or conjecture) as definitely wrong... only their methods.

The only good news is, it doesn't affect my conclusions, there's still something very wrong in the canonical climate equations.

[4] Such a decision could not only jeopardize the four - year Durban process that paved the way to the conclusion of the Paris Agreement, but also send the wrong signal to other State actors — both Parties and non-Parties — increasing the risk of hampering any further political impetus that may be needed in the future.

If we start from the position that she did nothing wrong, the only reasonable conclusion is that in publicly rebuking her and demoting her without cause, Chelsea has repudiated her contract.