Sentences with phrase «wrong side of right»

The Wrong Side of Right by Jenn Marie Thorne When Kate's mom dies suddenly, she goes to live with the father she's never met, who's running for President.

ESX Entertainment has announced that Sharon Stone (Basic Instinct, Casino) has signed on to appear in the drama Running Wild, which is to be directed by Alex Ranarivelo (The Wrong Side of Right).

When she goes undercover to take down a dog breeder suspected of wrongdoing, she quickly finds out she might be on the wrong side of right.

Not exact matches

There's always a right and a wrong side of every street, and before you rent your retail space, stand out front and count how many people walk by the door.

As discussed in the video, many traders fail to successfully trade on both sides of the market because, even if they have the right technical chart patterns, they simply buy or sell at the wrong time.

Even if you believe God is vanishingly unlikely to exist, the consequence of being wrong (Hell) is so great, and the benefits of being right (not having to go to church on Sundays) so comparatively miniscule, that you should probably just believe in God to be on the safe side.

Whether or not these media outlets will be on the right or wrong side of history remains to be seen.

If Jews want, for instance, to respond to the internal Christian debate over the possibility of salvation for non-Christians, then it is perfectly fair to announce that according to Judaism, one side of that Christian debate is right and the other wrong.

And it has often been the case, where race is involved, that the Christians on the wrong side of history have outnumbered those on the right side.

When the later Judaism saw in retrospect this conflict between prophetic ideals and popular religion, it was clear that the social solidarity of the nation had been on the wrong side of the issue and that Jeremiah, in his courageous and sacrificial isolation, had been right.

That shows us once and for all that there is no right or wrong side of history, but only of truth.

Christians like you in American history has always been on the wrong side of civil rights and morality.

That's fine Jerry, you just stick to your hatred, bigotry and ignorance... so what if you're on the wrong side of history... as long as you have the right to be a hateful, bigoted ignoramus, that's all that counts.

Not to say that you are right or wrong, but to see your side of the story.

They're on the wrong side of history when it comes to gay rights and a womens right to choose and they'll pay for it big time in 2012!

How can our Christian witness survive if we're on the wrong side of what many now call «the great civil rights issue of our time»?

Gay marriage is coming, you can either be on the right side of history, or the wrong side, but you can't stop history from happening.

It's the wrong side of the tracks in a dirty Midwestern town where you almost wonder if there is a right side.

The glory days of feature film animation were amidst World Wars, when propaganda on both sides was simple: Allies versus fascists, right takes on wrong, world defenders against world destroyers.

They insist that they are objectively right, and if you don't conform to their ideas, you are on the wrong side of history.

Even if we can not know the answer to all of society's ills, even if we can not pretend to know how to solve the problems of crime and drugs and inflation and poverty, we can still proclaim that it is obviously and unquestionably a moral wrong to maintain a penal system based on vengeance instead of rehabilitation; to allow human rights violations to go unchallenged (on either side of the iron curtain); to waste vast quantities of food and resources while others are malnourished and sick and poor; or to allow so many children in our own midst to go through childhood unwanted and unloved and even abused.

Many, regardless of which side their beliefs fall on, are driven by the innate human need to be right and seek to support their belief by proving the other side wrong.

You sound just like the people in the dark ages did when they were against civil rights for African Americans and women, you're the one on the wrong side of the moral debate with no facts to back yourselves up.

Someday, every one will get their wish, which side they stand on, the side of right or wrong.

Late in the year they wrote of the recent conflict in Europe, «We may not be ready yet to say that we did the wrong thing in going in on the side of what we thought was democracy, decency and the rights of men.

ok, ok, ok, i get it both sides think they are telling the truth there are no lyers here on this blogs only misinform people talking about two separate subjects yet thinking they are talking about the same thing the existence of god... one side believe the other doesn't what's wrong with that... sooner or later they'll changed their minds and one side will believe and the other won't so the arguement will forever be the same about two separate aguement on the same blog... but its definitely entertaining to read the comebacks... keep up the good work you all... its just as fun to read what the believer have to say as to what the nonebeliever have to say... after all it keeps all getting to know eachother better on what we believe right???

All I know is both sides of the house are equally guilty of «proving» the other wrong and not being able to prove themselves right.

The current game of «Capture the Flag» is a case in point, with one side arguing «my country right or wrong» and the other side arguing «America: change it or lose it.»

in the end nasri, fabregas even robin would still be playing at their best or close to, had they stayed with us but we know what happened however where are they trading their skills now?nasri on loan with sevilla, fabregas is warming the bench on the wrong side of the city, robin is in the turkish league:) short terms they made the right move but long terms they might have one or two regrets i think koss knows better!!

He can't effect the referee's decisions right or wrong so he can't be slated for that but what he can be slated for is yet again one of his teams loosing to a top 6 side away from home with the wrong players.

Brad Keselowski started the day on the right side of the playoff bubble, then quickly fell on the wrong side once the race began as Hamlin's dominating performance through the first two stages erased the 19 - point advantage Keselowski held.

I written why I thought the authors post has failed in logic, I may be wrong but I did say that a Right sided AM or a player who could play their for us would be more of a logical choice when looking at Wenger and the type of players he likes to buy.

Arsenal have been on the right and wrong side of some examples of this over the years, such as the timing of David Ospina's calanity in the Champions League this season which snatched the momentum form us and gave it straight back to Olympiacos just after Theo Walcott had given Arsenal a huge shot in the arm.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all

Cech is not good with Pennos, top top professional but in guessing the right way he is always wrong, he shimmies a little to one or both sides and then can not go full stretch to the side of his choice, and he never waits long enough to see if it's coming straight down the barrel.

Watch out Goonsqad, Charlie is gonna say Ya wrong mentioning Le Coq again is the best DM this season.Im with you as most fans agree he is the best this season and all we need is a Right sided player like Milner of City CB

We do not know if this little nugget of an Arsenal transfer rumour is actually right, but after Arsene Wenger signed a central midfielder Mohamed Elneny in the January transfer window and with the three current Arsenal players in question being generally on the fringe of the first team and being on the wrong side of the maghic 30 - year old mark I would say there is definitely something in it.

Key individuals right across the team are approaching or are already on the wrong side of 30, namely Gerard Pique, Sergio Busquets, Javier Mascherano, Andres Iniesta, Luis Suarez and Lionel Messi.

Its Not really as simple as everyone thinks Wenger has done really collosal things at the club and should rightly be feted as one of our greatest managers, HOWEVER over the last three or four years his persona and his ability have declined rapidly yet he still belives that he is right and and the whole of the rest of the footballing world are wrong, last summer even the hated and loathed Adrian Durham stated that all Wenger needed was three key players to turn the squad into the PL winning side it should be, that was a keeper, a CDM and a world class striker.

At right back, it was the 19 - year old Timothy Fosu - Mensah that started in place of second - choice Mateo Darmian and the Dutchman hardly put a foot wrong and often supported the side with aggressive forward runs.

I really hope that the OX turns out to be a great buy and I'm proven wrong as I'm not a fan of this guy and not sure How he improves our side as I'm hearing he wanted Liverpool because he wants to play the CM role where as Chelsea would play him as a wing back??? So let me get this right as been a busy few days for our club??

At right back Jenkinson put over some consistent crosses and got forward well considering, Defensively he was caught on the wrong side of his attacker and gave the ball away to often when making a simple pass.

There was little wrong with Tottenham's performance against the Belgian side, even after Dele Alli's rush of blood saw him sent off, but manager Mauricio Pochettino was right in saying the damage was done in the first leg in Belgium — a 1 - 0 defeat where Spurs were complacent and disinterested.

Grimshaw had already been called into action by Chong before the young keeper produced an outstanding save to deny Boonen and then lady luck was on his side as Zachary Dearnley beat him, only to see his effort go the wrong of the right post.

I don't care who is right or wrong in your great moral catfight, but I'm starting to think the Dr. on the other side must be a hell of alot smarter than you because she is keeping her mouth shut and not chasing every little blog mention trying to score points in the court of public opinion to keep herself looking important.

Making your own bias tape, knowing right side from wrong side of ribbing fabric and so much more... and you end up with a great towel bib that doesn't need to go over the baby's head.

Media can have too much power sometimes, remember they are not always an impartial voice of the world, they are usually telling it from one side's prospective, with that side's opinions and views (right or wrong).

The exact color of an heirloom tomato, the latest Chloris pattern is just sexy on the right side and wrong.

If someone has the power to say that on this controversial question, side A is right and side B is wrong and therefore anyone in Congress arguing in favor of side B is guilty of a crime and will be sent to prison, clearly the people who have this power are the ones who are really in control of the government.