Sentences with phrase «wrong side of that argument»

I wouldn't want to be on the wrong side of that argument.

I think it's pretty telling that one of the «pro» pink slime blog posts that I found on twitter has ranchers and farmers that are telling the author that she is on the wrong side of the argument.

He added: «While we've been working to get Britain back on track, Labour are on the wrong side of every argument.

He is of course right to suggest that their position puts then firmly on the wrong side of the argument and interestingly suggests that on this particular matter, and welfare reform in general the public are ahead of the politicians.

«The only people on the wrong side of the argument are him and his chancellor who are trying to divide the country,» Miliband replies.

Mr Osborne is a master at putting his political opponents on the wrong side of an argument that he has framed himself.

Attitudes amongst the public on welfare have been hardening putting Labour on the wrong side of the argument.

I've been on the wrong side of that argument.

Maybe you need to stop wasting your life on apparently wrong side of the argument?

Not exact matches

David had also come across a speech by former BP chief executive, Lord Browne, in which he spoke of the warnings company scientists had sounded about climate change, and how their arguments convinced him that it was wrong to side with climate denial.

The arguments put forth on both sides of this issue rest on such a level of compounding assumptions that only one thing can be certain: that both of them are completely wrong.

Arguments Online Dating The dive bar of dive bars on the wrong side of the track next to the trailer park.

Our report proves that neither side of the argument is completely right or wrong.

Not that I think there's any possibility whatsoever that Mooney is wrong; I'd simply like to read the opposite (incorrect) side of the argument too, which I can just imagine you making with your usual erudition and moral incandescence.

I wouldn't say she is even - handed in her criticism of the opposing sides, and I think she is taking precisely the wrong lesson from her arguments about uncertainty, but she doesn't seem more denier - ish lately to me.

While I hate to appear negative, I now expect to see a host of comments shouting about conspiracies, data falsification, biased sources, and all the other things to which an argument is reduced when you're on the wrong side of it.

James Delingpole makes the point very clearly at the end of the entry on «Global Warming» in his book How to be Right: «if the climate change doom mongers are really so sure all the evidence is on their side, why are they so keen to stifle any arguments which threaten to prove them wrong?»

TH: So often Republicans seem to be on the wrong side of the environmental argument... what's the role of leadership to change that versus make it worse?

One side of the argument being right doesn't make the other wrong.

As the argument degenerates on my side due to my increasing frustration at the ludicrous resistance I'm receiving from the RC person, they will refine their argument, move goalposts, argue over the precision and accuracy of my forecast, yabba on about how all orbital models of the inner solar system are wrong due to GIGO (which is rather ironic), and so forth.

In somewhat the same vein, put up a hand if you're in favour of a new rule of lawyer's professional conduct which states that lawyers acting for the winning side in a law suit are allowed to comment on the merits of the result for the media — print, electronic, and otherwise — only if the lawyers concede, on the record, that the decision is wrong on the facts and the law, and that they were surprised (nay, astonished, flabbergasted, etc) that any of their arguments were accepted by the judge.

What makes www.sihlu.com different from any other website is the fact that for once, both people who are involved in an argument can put in their side of the story and get votes on who is right or wrong.