Sentences with phrase «wrong side of the paper»

Not exact matches

(If the wrong sides of the fabric are inside, slide the transfer paper inside the fabric.

If the wrong sides of the fabric are outside, place the fabric inside the transfer paper.)

I predict a lot of stories in tomorrow's papers from those who've been on the wrong side of his tongue.

Place the backing fabric, such as batiste, on the wrong side of the wool fabric, and the paper pattern on the right side.

Iron the shiny side of the freezer paper to the wrong side of the fabric.

Since the template prints on both sides of an 8.5 x 11 sheet of paper, the way the paper is flipped for the second side (or the way settings are configured for duplex printers) can put the «pages» in the wrong spots.

Practising painting skies is a great exercise that can fill in a few spare minutes and is perfect for using up the reverse side of any watercolours that have gone wrong, so you won't waste time or paper - but the benefits will be long - lasting.

I am sorry but I think that Foukal el al's paper is very biased in the references they decided to use and dismiss all debates and, paradoxically, they arrive at the conclusion that the side of the debate they represent is likely wrong!!!

Apart from the fundamental scientific advances of the breakthrough papers, there is an hierarchy of classes of lesser papers, along the lines of those which — • Confirm or deny the main thrust of a breakthrough paper by arriving from other angles • Provide an alternative or improvement to the main findings of breakthrough papers • Contribute more observation to the breakthrough paper and discuss its relevance • Seek to set a complementary base for a breakthrough in a related aspect of science • Report the views of a clutch of authors about a topic they deem to have political importance • Ditto for educational importance • Write papers that are knowingly lacking good science to place authors in one camp or another • Lambast an author or authors for being on the «wrong» side of a polarised topic • Perform meta analysis Etc..

As far as I can see, almost all tests of the paper are on the wrong side, i.e. they test things that are not expected to work.

But then, think about a speculative paper that went for the mirror - opposite side of the spectrum, saying «what if we've been wrong about everything about climate change and here's a negative feedback mechanism previously undiscovered that will safely limit things.»

I didn't say anything complimentary about this paper, Steve McIntyre, or anyone else on the «wrong side,» but because I'm critical of the laughably predictable responses from everyone involved, and I posted here, I * must * be the enemy.

Skeptical Science is a typical example of activists with a political axe to grind, whose real function is to chill debate by slandering those on the wrong side of the issue, trying to keep their papers out of the literature, etc..

It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you there are, and certainly not how many papers your side has published, if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong.

Working on the back (wrong) side of the scrapbook paper, place the piece of the vellum with the traced facial features face down, so that when you're looking at the faces, they're in reverse.

Iron the shiny side of the freezer paper to the wrong side of the fabric.