Just like there are stupid people who've never actually read the bible and yet feel the need to post stupid and
wrong statements about Christianity on the CNN news blog.
«He made a factually
wrong statement about a certain game so he is a dumbass who doesn't know how to run a company» Sure thing bud.
Not exact matches
Value investor Guy Spier writes: «I try to avoid walking into the trap of making
statements about any stocks that we currently own, since the situation might later change or I might discover that I was
wrong.
wow you have no idea what you're talking
about... everything you said is
wrong in this
statement... i am now dumber for having read it
If as you say, «two
wrongs [don't] make a right argument» then why not debate @Blarg's
statement instead of inciting atheists condemnation of his / her arguments by indirectly making a blanket
statement about how Atheist should be offended?
Putting any personal
statement in the letters over the words of Jesus to underline a personal opinion
about truth is the
wrong chronology.
@Randy: I don't want to add to the barrage, but you made a
statement about people trying to prove Christianity
wrong.
Below is a list of the questions Walter Kaiser raises in his book, with a brief summary of his answers and a short
statement about why I think his answers are
wrong.
Yet any
statement one makes
about Cuba always seems in the next breath to be partly
wrong, crying out for qualification the moment after it is observed.
Unfortunately
about a dozen or so issued weak
statements that, in fact, served to establish a «conscience» loophole that allowed dissenters to claim that couples whose consciences did not consider contraception to be
wrong in their case, could use contraception without sin.
It's not because there's anything
wrong about churches of any size — or mission
statements.
If I'm
wrong about this, Rauch should be able to produce earlier
statements in which hundreds of self - identified «lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender and allied activists, scholars, educators, writers, artists, lawyers, journalists, and community organizers,» including notable scholars at top academic institutions and leaders of respected organizations, endorsed sexual arrangements involving three or more conjugal partners.
broad
statements about whom and where to beat or which players should score how many goals on average are just unnecessary
statements which says nothing
about the title, only throwaway opinion from the pundits who have no plans, every singlw title winner in the last 10 years will have drawn at home against teams they were expected to beat, nothing
wrong there
«Having said that, I believe
about Ozil it's a
wrong statement [from Scholes].
«In deciding to waive the disqualification penalty, the committee recognized that had it talked to Woods — before he returned his scorecard —
about his drop on the 15th hole and
about the committee's ruling, the committee likely would have corrected that ruling and concluded that Woods had dropped in and played from a
wrong place,» the
statement read.
talk
about skewing the stats to fit your own conclusions... this is like a slap in the face to every real Arsenal fan... have you no shame, have you no dignity, have you no sense of right from
wrong... if you think everything was so well orchestrated why is everyone and their brother laughing at the way in which we conduct business both on and off the field... either you're a paid hack or a delusional buffoon... regardless you can't be a genuine Arsenal fan because the difficulties facing this club having been going on for years and this latest episode in our pathetic recent history is but a glaring reminder of how far we have fallen... I'm not going to waste my time discrediting every single ridiculous
statement you made in your love letter to Wenger, but if you write another article I will gladly expose you for the fraud you truly are... this club is in desperate need of a serious cleansing and for you to try and package this dog and pony show as a well - oiled machine is a direct insult to anyone who has supported this team during the supposed «lean» years... the deceptive and disrespectful manner in which this organization has treated it's fans is an abomination to supporters everywhere and for you to even try to justify their actions is akin to saying just shut - up and keep filling our pockets... so please crawl back under whatever stone you crawled out from under and think carefully before you spew this type of propaganda ever again
Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier
statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive
statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories
about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me
wrong Arsene
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this
statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly
about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's
wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good
about the way their future potential employer feels
about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule
about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
But to make blanket
statements about Open Adoption and misquote someone is
wrong.
I targeted your
statement about the Netherlands, because it was painfully
wrong.
Interestingly, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Medical Association feel strongly
about it, too - strongly enough to issue a
statement saying that she made the
wrong choice.
Even if they are
wrong, the idea that a court can declare that someone's public
statements about a controversial political issue are lies and punish them with criminal penalties strikes at the very heart of democracy.
The
statement is desperate, aimed at the
wrong target he's forgotten, it seems,
about Carl Paladino), and poorly written.
«Lord Rennard has always denied that he did anything
wrong, the
statements that were placed before Alistair Webster were four
statements with complaint in them and
about a hundred which refuted those complaints, some of them by people who were present or close to present at the times alleged.
Ball's growing concerns over the religious exemptions in the governor's bill was met with a
statement from Cuomo spokesman Josh Vlasto, who said the Hudson Valley Republican was
wrong about the language.
The
statement reads, «Despite the futile attempt by rumour mongers
about the well - intended gesture of the Nigerian Army to scare genuine beneficiaries of the exercise, the 6 Division went ahead and proved critics
wrong.
Topics during the Q&A portion of his press conference included the looming discontinuance of the Rockaway ferry, a broad consideration of his earlier
statement about «righting greater
wrongs,» what happened to government funding for a ferry obtained by Anthony Weiner and Joe Addabbo, whether there is any City effort to «track down scammers» in the Build it Back program, how satisfied de Blasio is with the pace of Build it Back, whether an updated evacuation plan is contemplated in conjunction with increasing the housing supply in Rockaway and a government memo reported by The Wave which stated that more money was available from FEMA than publicly acknowledged and that such additional funding could be a political liability.
«Protesters first claimed they weren't notified
about sitings, and when we proved them
wrong they directed their anger towards homeless women and children themselves,» Worthy - Davis said in a
statement.
A spokeswoman for Collins said in a
statement about the demonstration that he «realizes that there is no easy answer to this crisis,» but that «he is supportive of President Trump's commitment to ban bump stocks and improve our nation's background check system to prevent dangerous weapons from getting into the
wrong hands.»
ALBANY — Gov. Paterson's lawyer says the governor has done nothing
wrong — despite a new report that he helped draft what would have been a misleading public
statement about...
«Harriet Harman has apologised for her comment
about Danny Alexander and says it was
wrong,» said a hastily issued Labour Party
statement.
Now we note a real arrogance in their
statements about climate change, they are right and anyone who opposes their way of thinking is
wrong.
«This is a
wrong turn,» said Russ Harrison, government relations director for IEEE - USA in Washington, D.C., in a
statement about the bill.
Creationists eagerly seized on the
statement of Richard Leakey, its discoverer, that 1470 «wipes out everything we have been taught
about human evolution [this proved to be
wrong], and I have nothing to offer in its place».
Don't get me
wrong, there's something magical
about scrolling through Fashion Week slideshows of high - end designers» take on trends and fashion
statements, but I often find it difficult to translate the exaggerated trends into...
Now, don't get me
wrong — I love my
statement necklaces and earrings — but there's something so fresh and clean
about simple and minimal accessories.
Haha, you're not
wrong about the crazy runway
statements!
Responding to separate tweets both criticizing and thanking the creative team for the scene, Edmondson acknowledged the cameo but explained and later clarifying that anyone thinking Marvel and the creative team were making a «petty
statement about the film» are
wrong - making it clear he does not sing in the chorus of those lambasting the film.
SKIP THIS MOVIE IF: you're looking for a political
statement about whether US policy is right or
wrong
Don't get me
wrong, this film makes a serious
statement about misogynistic behavior and the people we deem «normal» in everyday society.
That's a
wrong - headed approach, the science teachers group told Botel, and also contradicts
statements made by Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and President Donald Trump
about the importance of science.
The average layperson who isn't reading
about education policy and data all day might get the
wrong impression from that
statement.
Gillian Flynn, takes that
statement to its darkest place in this unputdownable masterpiece
about a marriage gone terribly, terribly
wrong.
I really hope I was
wrong and the
statement about world - wide accessibility is true.
However, if I'm
wrong about the deep discounting, then I have no idea why my royalty
statements and the royalty
statements of other authors that I've seen from different companies are 80 - 90 % paid at the deep discount royalty rate.
It refers to the fact that when we make a
statement like «I think the Earth is flat,» we can be
wrong about Earth's flatness, but we can not be
wrong about the «I,» the subjective self that is making the assertion.
The iPad showed that people who claimed nobody would read books on an LCD screen were just as
wrong as the iPad Pro has shown Jobs
statement about stylus and handwriting on a tablet was
wrong.
There is a lot
wrong with that
statement, and it showed me how many misconceptions exist
about credit card accounts.
In case of errors or questions
about your funding Transfers call us at 1-800-347-3085 or write us at P.O. Box 30943, Salt Lake City, UT 84130 - 0943 as soon as you can, if you think your
statement is
wrong or if you need more information
about a funding Transfer listed on the
statement.
The
statement I made
about a hypothetical situation with a 5 % drop in portfolio value dropping the IRR from 10 % to 5 %, was
wrong.