Sentences with phrase «wrong statements likes»

Given that kind of start, it is no surprise that the author of two such contradictory and wrong statements likes this new bicycle helmet envisioned by the Future Cities Catapult.

Not exact matches

«After receiving an initial briefing from Equifax, I have decided to hold a hearing on the matter so that we can learn what went wrong and what we need to do to better protect consumers from serious breaches like this in the future,» Walden said in a statement.

«The board's action today was unfair and illegal and we will be relentless in rectifying this wrong,» he said in a statement after the vote, alleging that it takes more valuable shares away from early owners like himself.

Just like there are stupid people who've never actually read the bible and yet feel the need to post stupid and wrong statements about Christianity on the CNN news blog.

So, I think i'm within my rights to ask, under the contours that David has established: were Jesus» exclusivist statements wrong, too, just like His views with the Syro - Phoenecian women were (apparently — I vehemently disagree)?

We get the gospel wrong when we think that doctrinal statements can summarize the gospel and empower us to live like Jesus.

Some honest Christians answer these issues with statements like; I can't explain why but it must be wrong because it conflicts with the bible.

I also would like what is wrong with the statement I made is it true or not??? and the age of yeah»

I would like to hear anything that you might find wrong with my statements.

Silly and plain wrong hype like this statement is very unhelpful and raises expectations unneccessarily.

Statements like this will rub people the wrong way.

talk about skewing the stats to fit your own conclusions... this is like a slap in the face to every real Arsenal fan... have you no shame, have you no dignity, have you no sense of right from wrong... if you think everything was so well orchestrated why is everyone and their brother laughing at the way in which we conduct business both on and off the field... either you're a paid hack or a delusional buffoon... regardless you can't be a genuine Arsenal fan because the difficulties facing this club having been going on for years and this latest episode in our pathetic recent history is but a glaring reminder of how far we have fallen... I'm not going to waste my time discrediting every single ridiculous statement you made in your love letter to Wenger, but if you write another article I will gladly expose you for the fraud you truly are... this club is in desperate need of a serious cleansing and for you to try and package this dog and pony show as a well - oiled machine is a direct insult to anyone who has supported this team during the supposed «lean» years... the deceptive and disrespectful manner in which this organization has treated it's fans is an abomination to supporters everywhere and for you to even try to justify their actions is akin to saying just shut - up and keep filling our pockets... so please crawl back under whatever stone you crawled out from under and think carefully before you spew this type of propaganda ever again

This statement looks like there's nothing wrong with it.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The result will live long in the memories of all England fans, for all the wrong reasons, and it looked like Hodgson would be sneaking out of the back door when he issued a written statement, announcing his resignation.

is pseudo scientific in the sense of specious — it's wrong to talk as if the structural deficit is something that can be measured like an item of a profit & loss statement.

We do this habitually and its just wrong, but we aren't concerned with its implications like these offensive statements I read in these forums.

He and his colleagues surveyed people who watched Will & Grace, measuring whether or not they agreed with statements like «Sex between two men is just plain wrong» and «Lesbians are sick.»

There's nothing like a bold lipstick to make a statement — but there's also nothing like poorly applied bold lipstick to turn heads for all the wrong reasons.

Don't get me wrong, I do love a bold statement piece on the regular, but I also like pieces that whisper instead of shout.

And those who don't wear statement pieces like those, what's wrong with them?

Just like we all need a perfect pair of fitting jeans, we can also never go wrong by investing into a statement jacket!

It refers to the fact that when we make a statement like «I think the Earth is flat,» we can be wrong about Earth's flatness, but we can not be wrong about the «I,» the subjective self that is making the assertion.

The that drek like that even gets published, yet alone pushed into best sellerdom is a statement as to what is wrong with the system.

Don't get me wrong, there are good people too but they're outweighed by morons, a blanket statement for the planet if you like!

There's nothing wrong with mounting stylistically consistent shows — practically every artist has created consistent bodies of work, even Polke — it's just that Polke's rubber - band version of Durer, precisely because of its singularity, looks to me like a decisive artistic statement, whereas Prince's works, whatever their qualities, involve developing an artistic discovery (or rediscovery?)

why not admit that she was wrong, instead of a weak and misleading statement like: This statement is an inaccurate reflection of what is in Montford's book.

Bothe statements are clearly wrong on all counts, yet you don't mention these and many like them.

Also to claim that the temperature change is well defined even though the details are wrong is a statement that sounds like the assurances that we heard from bankers that subprime mortgages should be rated AAA.

Sooner or later, someone who really matters, and is now a proponent of CAGW, like our hostess, is going to come out with a clear and unequivocal statement that CAGW is wrong, fraudulent, corrupt, etc..

Jim C. writes: «Sooner or later, someone who really matters, and is now a proponent of CAGW, like our hostess, is going to come out with a clear and unequivocal statement that CAGW is wrong, fraudulent, corrupt, etc..

I would expect to hear a lot of attacks against the man rather than the ball — statements like «This work is not published in an established journal, so it will not be considered» as opposed to «This work is wrong because...».

I also think John is wrong in the 3 % CO2 statement, and that he should just admit it and move on, but I would like to discuss a partial validation.

By not specifying which climate models you are talking about, and making completely general statements like this, you are guaranteed to be wrong.

Instead of admitting the science is wrong they double down and make increasingly extreme statements, just like the IPCC.

This statement is flatly wrong; shareholders can take part in management, can be management, without losing their limited liability; they do not have to be «passive investors», they can be as active as they like.

I find it difficult to make sweeping statements like «This is the best phone out there, period,» because such generalizations are prone to be wrong for a lot of people.

McAfee went on record as stating that Monero has the potential to challenge bitcoin as a leading cryptocurrency and, while this seems like an outlandish statement right now, McAfee has proved many wrong in the space already and it would be foolish to write him off, whatever he's predicting.

Statements like this tell children their naturally sad feelings are silly or wrong.

«Brokers sometimes make statements or claims about other brokers» business practices — like fee splits — that aren't entirely accurate or are sometimes outright wrong,» says Dax Watson, a lawyer at Mack, Drucker & Watson in Phoenix who advises and defends real estate brokers.

The campaign hints at what consumers don't know and what can go wrong in real estate with statements like, «It's all fun and games until someone doesn't read the fine print» and «Based on your knowledge of building codes, the basement could definitely probably be finished.