Sentences with phrase «wrong teachings out»

There are many wrong teachings out there that confused people about God.

There are many wrong teaching out there that mixed up and confused the law of Moses with the abundance of grace and the gift of righteousness, a free gift given by Jesus Christ.

Not exact matches

Bill Nye, «the Science Guy,» made fundamentalist Christian heads snap recently when he declared it was flat - out wrong for children to be taught creationism.

I'm just pointing out that facets of religion are used in many aspects of growing up to teach morality and right from wrong and teach a society behavior.

Walter G. Everett in his Moral Values has pointed out that by surrounding the process with inhibitions, dark hints, and scoldings it would be quite possible to teach a child that it is wrong to eat cherries.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

Martin Luther presented the theology of Sola scriptura that the bible is the sole source to live and understand what Christianity is all about... but the bible itself does not come with a table of contents to prove that it is correct which is why the bible itself says that the CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this teaching.

People with low IQ are very fearful of having a lot of information thrown at them and many times don't have the ability to step out of their own experiences or handle that what they were taught by their pastor or whomever that X, Y and Z are wrong.

That's an extreme example, but I could give you examples of Christians who teach that you and I are gods, that Satan was Christ's brother, that Satan and demons are behind every sickness and everything that goes wrong in your life, that seeing a feather in church is proof that an angel is there, that God wants to change your fillings to gold, and that if you are not healthy and wealthy you are out of God's will.

Teaching that is tantamount to state sponsored religion, with is unconst!tutional... feel free to disagree, but your are flat out wrong.

IMnot a bad person at all... IM sorry you feel that way... but you pretty much twisted things (God is murderous... murder is defined as UNLAWFUL taking of life) I teach that God takes and is judge of ALL life... Im sorry you feel that is wrong... I do NOT teach people to go out and murder or take lives of others... you are making a dishonest blanket statement and lumping everyone together in such a way...

What worries me most, is that what we've been taught as right, will actually turn out to be wrong, and what we always thought of as wrong, will turn out to be right.

«many times a trangender is interviewed and that person will say that they knew already when they were 4 years old that they were born in the wrong body» There is not one 4 year old out there that hasn't been inclined to do wrong either, just by their nature... and they need to be taught, disciplined and corrected in order to grow up normal.

But in light of Jonah, we have to say that either he is not saved, or that idea that some people teach is just flat out wrong.

He has several million dollars so he can afford to be wrong, but the people who follow his crackpot teachings are left hanging when they find out its all a scam.

What if Christians are right about Christ and his teachings and that HE is the way to Heaven then they will be in Heaven one day and those who do not follow Christ will be in Hell... However, if they are wrong at least they don't lose out as they have tried to live their lives according to principles that most of us would say are commendable and so they WIN either way....

1) In order to get value out of the bible, as you describe, we need an * independent * sense of right and wrong — those other long - established theologies included — something to teach us what to be inspired by and what to be appalled by and show us what direction that «moving forward» is actually going in.

I could be wrong, but I don't think this is how they teach you how to box out in youth basketball.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

Other mothers simply feel that spanking isn't effective: «I don't plan on using spanking — I think it teaches children to «behave» out of fear, not because they've learned right from wrong.»

Teach them what is right and punish what is wrong, but always punish out of love, not anger (like yelling).

Whether you're trying to keep your preschooler out of trouble or teach her right from wrong, try a better, more effective approach than simply saying «no.»

This is, of course, not to say that these concepts are not covered elsewhere in staff development, but for academic integrity to truly function properly it needs to be part of the mainstream discourse around learning and teaching, not something that academics find out about through rules and regulations once something goes wrong.»

Creationists eagerly seized on the statement of Richard Leakey, its discoverer, that 1470 «wipes out everything we have been taught about human evolution [this proved to be wrong], and I have nothing to offer in its place».

Liz and I are trying to teach people that there are so many health myths out there and wrong ideas about foods that we have been sold for many decades.

Often times there are too many people who are out there who are all willing and able to teach this new kind of fetish hookup to you, but you may end up meeting the wrong kind of guy.

Everything's going wrong in the classroom; the teacher's frustration level is so high that she's ready to walk out and try her hand at any other profession besides teaching.

Other strategies include: (1) establishing and using a time - out or cooling - off place (even an informal time - out activity like having a child take a message, book, or box of chalk to another teacher could give the student the space and time he or she needs to maintain or regain composure); (2) applying role plays, simulations (for example, Barnga, Living in a Global Age, Rafa - Rafa, and Broken Squares) and moral dilemmas to teach students how to resolve conflicts, make collective decisions, appreciate different perspectives, weigh consequences, identify right from wrong, and check impulsive behavior; and (3) suggesting or assigning literature with characters who face similar challenges to that of the disabled student.

Pryor has dedicated himself to hiring his personal friends, giving out millions of dollars in contracts to out - of - state, politically - connected companies, putting his «Turnaround Office» in the hands of Morgan Barth, a person who illegally taught and worked for Pryor's charter school management company (Achievement First, Inc.) for six years and relentlessly and consistently doing the wrong thing for Connecticut's system of public education.

Journeying out of the mountains and into what is left of civilization, they discover that much of what they've been taught about the collapse is wrong.

I sent my Teach Grant certification to the address on the form I received which I found out was the wrong place AFTER I received it back by USPS Return Mail.

In some ways, the quick recovery taught some endowment investors the wrong lesson — that they could wait out any crisis.

Voices throughout the pet world all agree the old saying, «you can't teach old dogs new tricks,» is flat - out wrong.

Or was my fifth grade math teacher wrong when she taught me that to work out an average temp for one month you add up all temps for the month then divide by number of days in the month!

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying all advisors are out for themselves, some of them have just been taught that this is the way to go.

I believe — and years of working as a therapist in Stockholm with many couples in the international community has taught me — that the number one thing we can do when a relationship goes in the wrong direction is to stop and take a time - out.

Teach them right from wrong from infancy and not start at school age, middle school, or high school and guess what they turn out to be some damn awesome people.

The parenting behaviors are assigned to nine subscales (with item examples in brackets): positive parental behavior («I make time to listen to my child, when he / she wants to tell me something»), autonomy («I teach my child that he / she is responsible for his / her own behavior»), rules («I teach my child to obey rules»), monitoring («I keep track of the friends my child is seeing»), discipline («When my child has done something wrong, I punish him / her by taking away something nice [for instance, the child can't watch TV,...]»), harsh punishment («I slap my child when he / she has done something wrong»), ignoring unwanted behavior («When my child does something that is not allowed, I only talk to him / her again when he / she behaves better»), inconsistent discipline («When I have punished my child, it happens that I let my child out of the punishment early»), and material rewarding («I give my child money or a small present when he / she has done something that I am happy about»).

Here are the Show Notes: Currently have 5 rentals and 80k of income and trying to paying off rentals because near retirement Also flips properties where the goal is 20k profit He outsources much of the work Got rentals in 2011 and regret not doing it earlier Got hammered in 2008 Got out of the market in 2000 Interest rates are very low which is different that past times which means a good time to lock in loans, stocks are pretty high Real estate is not for everyone and might have a wrong skill set If you don't want to do the work be a hard money flipper but only make 10 % (you need to have the money) Don't lend to someone doing their first flip Need to hire a virtual assistant — 5 properties can manage by self Let go of politics Marriage advice Begin with the end in mind — He already knows his legacy and just lives it Teaching kids financial principals — mindsets and habits To teach a 12 - year - old — give them money To teach a 30 - year - old — they need to want to fix the money problem Letting go to be happy richersoul.com