Sentences with phrase «wrong theories right»

And, among all possible motivations climatists are actually being paid out of the limitless purse of the government and academia's promise of lifetime tenure to make evidence and models dance to any tune they wish to play and accordingly, the climatists will always succeed in «proving wrong theories right,» whatever it takes.

Not exact matches

People're seduced in the «right or wrong» and «black or white» theory confined in our prison of logic..

Science takes credit for trying to interpret what God has created (yet of course there theories are always wrong or never proven, even after proven, often changed when found out to be false (because scientists are wrong all the time and think they are right)

Lincoln, he believes, renewed the theory of statecraft by insisting that «ultimate moral questions did not admit of relativistic interpretations,» while knowing at the same time that the attempt to right moral wrongs may have tragic consequences and almost certainly will not achieve unqualified success.

Well, according to the new Judgement Day theory, we'll know by May 21 whether Mr. Hawking is right or wrong on this one.

How if the theory is wrong, then my theory must be right.

... That being said, here are my «top books» of profound interest: Letter to the Romans, by apostle Paul Proverbs, by Solomon Now That I Believe, by Robert Cook Reality Theory & Control Therapy, by William Glasser Handbook of Personal Evangelism, by Stanford & Seymour Exposition of Hebrews, by Arnold Fruchtenbaum The Gift of GOD, by Richard Seymour Sin, the Savior, & Salvation: The Theology of Everlasting Life, by Robert Lightner Systematic Theology, by Norman Geisler Systematic Theology, by L.S. Chafer Getting The Gospel Right: A Balanced View of Salvation Truth, by Gordon Olson Getting the Gospel Wrong, by J.B. Hixon His Needs Her Needs, by Willard Harley *** grin ***

The church eventually accepted that what they thought the Bible taught was wrong, and that the discoveries of Galileo were right, and many within the church accepted the Dual Revelation Theory.

Both say that since you only have theories and beliefs you are wrong and niether has proof they are right.

One theory is that a wrong word retrieved from our memory blocks the way for the right word — a state that Nickerson recognises in crossword solving when an initial wrong guess makes it more difficult to find the true solution.

Since the theory can't be disproved, there may never be a way to tell if it is right or wrong.

«It could be longer than my lifetime before we have experimental proof that string theory is right or wrong.

Evolution is a valid scientific theory for the origin of species that has been repeatedly tested and verified through observation, formulation of testable statements to explain those observations, and controlled experiments or additional observations to find out whether these ideas are right or wrong.

Understanding the relative importance of mutation and selection, and to what extent the neutral theory is right or wrong, will remain a key question.

But with a nutritionally sound diet, what matters is not whether the theory is wrong or right, scientific or unscientific.

I have learned by personal experience of treating countless candida patients that the truth is, there is no right or wrong, only theories.

There are many theories with regard to the right and the wrong carbohydrates you can consume if you have a candida yeast infection.

For instance, his comment — «That theory, as it stands — that very strong claim — is certainly not true,» — is just wrong / misguided for reasons I don't have time / energy to elaborate on right now.

Fortunately for everyone, feelings are not facts, and any negative conclusions you have come to regarding your dating life truly are just theories, waiting to be proven right or wrong.

Enlisting the aid of his model girlfriend (Kelly, Dial M for Murder), nurse (Ritter, Birdman of Alcatraz) and policeman friend (Corey, Sorry Wrong Number), it seems the more he digs into his theory the more farfetched it becomes, but he is convinced he is right.

«What our collaborative learning style empowers and enables is a student's resilience — how do you look to your neighbor as a resource, how do you test your own theories, how do you understand if you're on the right track or the wrong track?»

Like it is mentioned in the Introduction, weighing the human rights and fundamental freedoms is not only against theory and raison d'être of the institution of the fundamental rights, but theoretically impossible and morally wrong.

She reflected that, when looking back, reformers turned to «the last refuge of policy scoundrels: insisting, «The theory was right, it was just the details of implementation that went wrong.»»

If his theories are right (and mine wrong), if he succeeds, he will face a difficult challenge in collapsing the Fed's balance sheet as inflation re-emerges, without taking the wind out of the economy.

As I said to Barry above, what I am saying is that the consensus is wrong, and that the Austrian School and those that understand nonlinear systems theory are right.

Later he writes more bluntly: «[The efficient market hypothesis and theory of rational expectations] claims that the markets are always right; my proposition is that markets are almost always wrong but often they can validate themselves».

Because theories don't matter, opinions don't matter, even how right you are doesn't matter — if your P&L says you're wrong....

Of course, sometimes their bets are wrong, but in theory, their bets should be right more often than not.

TRIBECA & SOHO & NOHO & EAST VILLAGE & MURRAY HILL 100 Painters of Tomorrow / 23 Warren / thru 12/6 Material Way curated by Kathleen Kucka / BMCC — CUNY / 81 Barclay / thru 12/1 Carey Denniston / Kansas / 59 Franklin / thru 12/20 Anton Perich / Postmasters / 54 Franklin (new location) / thru 11/22 Terry Winters / The National Exemplar / 381 Broadway @ White — suite 206 / thru 12/31 Bianculli's Personal Theory of TV Evolution organized by David Bianculli / Apexart / 291 Church / thru 12/20 Seokmin Ko; Elena Berriolo / API / 434 Greenwich / thru 12/20 Basim Magdy; Daphne Fitzpatrick; Will Yackulic / Art in General / 79 Walker / thru 1/10 Mohammed Kazem / Grahne / 157 Hudson / thru 12/20 MFA Thesis Exhibition (Part I) / Hunter / 205 Hudson (on Canal) / thru 11/22 Ariel Orozco / Brownstone / 3 Wooster / thru 11/22 Design Series / Swiss Institute / 18 Wooster / thru 11/23 Classical Nudes / Leslie - Lohman Museum / 26 Wooster / thru 1/4 Roy Lichtenstein / Feldman / 31 Mercer / thru 12/20 Opening 11/22 Pedro Cabrita Reis / Freeman / 140 Grand / thru 12/20 Sam Samore / Team / 83 Grand / thru 12/21 Opening 11/23 Tim Noble & Sue Webster / Geiss / 76 Grand / thru 12/20 Chris Domenick / Recess Activities / 41 Grand / thru 12/20 Smoothie Social: 11/22 (3 - 6 PM) Performance: 12/18 (6 - 8 PM) Prime Matter / Senaspace / 229 Centre / thru 12/6 Thread Lines; Xanti Schawinsky / Drawing Center / 35 Wooster / thru 12/14 Open Sessions 2 / Drawing Center: The Lab / 35 Wooster / thru 12/14 Opening 11/21 Andreas Schulze / Team / 47 Wooster / thru 12/21 Opening 11/23 Phillip Chen, etc. / Museum of Chinese in America / 215 Centre / thru 3/1 Nadja Frank; Jessica Segall / Denny / 261 Broome / thru 12/7 Paul Cowan / Clifton Benevento / 515 Broadway / thru 12/20 Mitsuko Miwa / Longhouse / 285 Spring / thru 12/6 Reuven Israel / Fridman / 287 Spring / thru 12/20 Plasmatik: K.K.Thoen, G.Kroenert, S.A.March, T.Francke, S.Tufnell; curated by N.Kates / Melissa / 102 Greene / Opening 11/20 (7 - 9 PM) Social Photography IV / Carriage Trade @ Harvey Foundation / 537 Broadway / Closing Reception 11/22 (6 - 9 PM) The Right Amount of Wrong curated by Lovina Purple / ISE Foundation / 555 Broadway / thru 12/19 Ernesto Burgos / Werble / 83 Van Dam / thru 12/20 Suzatte Bross / Geary / 185 Varick / thru 12/6 Amy O'Neill / Karma / 39 Great Jones / thru 12/6 Alex Kwartler; LeRoy Stevens / Karg / 41 Great Jones / thru 11/26 Learn to Read Art: A Surviving History of Printed Matter / 80WSE / NYU / 80 Washington Square East / thru 2/14 Opening 12/2 Reception 12/12 Ernest Cole / NYU Grey Art Gallery / 100 Wash..

The theory may be more right than wrong.

Stop arguing about who's theory is right or wrong, about the need for more data and better forecasting models.

It's not sufficient to say that they might be wrong, or they might be measuring something different from what they seem to, and so therefore I might be right even though my theory doesn't agree with them.

All I know is that, as I said in my first post, it doesn't help for AGW theorists to keep saying «We've got a theory and you don't, so we're right and you're wrong.»

«Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.»

But engineers around the world understand that no amount of determinism is going to prove any AGW theory as right or wrong.

You take away the wonder of science if you say emphatically that people are wrong and you are right when the scientific evidence is based on models, and theories with huge gaps in the knowledge.

It is a simple fact that it has been stated that if CO2 rises yet the temperature does not for more than 15 years, the theory is proven wrong (it is hard to prove a scientific theory right, but you can always prove it wrong).

The debate between particle and wave theories of light lasted for hundreds of years, when both sides turned out to be right, or wrong, depending on how you regard quantum theory.

People are quick to believe this little conspiracy with absolutely no proof while dismissing the theory of pressure by Trenberth et al. in light of their published emails (right or wrong) which in no uncertain terms describes this exact strategy.

Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing — in terms of economic socialism and environmental policy.

Is there any authority you will accept, or is your argument going to remain «I'm completely ignorant of actual thermodynamics and statistical mechanics and mechanics and electrodynamics and quantum theory — beyond the level a bright high school student might have accomplished — but I doubt that any of them are right, so when Jelbring states a result that openly contradicts their content that doesn't mean that he is probably wrong.»?

My instincts tell me that we're probably all wrong, and all right, and it will take some unusual combination of all of these theories to make a real difference in the world.

With that in mind, we felt it was important to physically check what the data itself was saying, rather than presuming the greenhouse effect theory was right or presuming it was wrong... After all, «Nature» doesn't care what theories we happen to believe in — it just does its own thing!

In science, objective knowledge means right or wrong is not invested in the person, but in fact and theory.

First as there can be no trust in any individual model, the «ensemble theory» has been invented according to which every model gets «something» right (but nobody knows what) and something wrong (everything else).

That is the right way to show to everybody that a proposed theory is wrong, so everybody will see it and move on.

Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing, in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.

His wording that the data is wrong and the models / theory are right on this particular point is even stronger than mine (wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/17/richard-lindzen-a-case-against-precipitous-climate-action/):

The problem with adjusting parameters after the fact is that every theory can be made to work this way, no matter how right or wrong it might be.

The theory is that ads on real weblogs are by and large uninteresting to visitors, who come for the content; but those who arrive in splogs will find themselves with «wrong» content and «right» ads, and so will click on the ads.