Sentences with phrase «wrong values of»

Not exact matches

Zhang Yiming, the founder of Junri Toutiao, said the app had «walked the wrong path» and the company «did not realize that technology must be guided by socialist core values.»

But where I think they went wrong before, and what I would emphasize in this line of products, is the educational value.

«The moment it becomes economic — like it did in the case of Magna — where that large shareholder was using it as a way to facilitate greater payments and economic value to themselves, that's when I think it's disgustingly wrong,» Seif says.

«If they were buying it for the real estate investment, they made the wrong decision,» says Kelly, who notes that Intrawest's remaining developable property in Whistler had a modest book value of between $ 75 million and $ 100 million.

IT»S easy to get excited about what's happening in the fast - moving world of currency values but it's wrong to describe what's happening as a «war», because it's not; what's going on is simply economics at work, and it's telling a story of changes in the wealth of nations.

«Everybody has now been proven wrong on it,» said Andy Kilpatrick, who wrote «Of Permanent Value: The Story of Warren Buffett.&raquOf Permanent Value: The Story of Warren Buffett.&raquof Warren Buffett.»

I still believe in the model of leadership I learned at West Point, which is about values, which is about choosing the harder right rather than the easier wrong, about homogeneity of character, about a leader's character is their identity.

We could have avoided a lot of difficulty without that issue, but even without considering market internals, history teaches that the longer value - conscious investors are wrong, the more seriously their views should be taken (remember Roger Babson).

Don't get me wrong — I'm sure Zuckerberg is very sorry that his share price has plummeted and that the #DeleteFacebook movement is gaining momentum, putting billions of dollars in shareholder value at risk.

It is painfully obvious how wrong this method is if you are a value investor and like to buy things that are out of favor.

Distribution Stock - When sock is sold there are several approaches that can be used, If the stock is sold all at once on the market, some analysts might interpret that as an indication that there is something wrong and as a result the value of the stock could be adversely affected.

The case method is the antithesis of how entrepreneurs build startups — it teaches pattern recognition tools for the wrong patterns — and therefore has limited value as an entrepreneurship teaching tool.

I'm always amazed at the number of restaurant companies that incentivize their operators on the wrong things when it comes to building value.

This means that if you «time» your trade wrong and the value of XRP goes down after you make the exchange, you still owe tax on your BTC gain even though you subsequently lost money.

As I have written in a former blog post, http://www.stockles.com/2017/01/22/valueinvesting-vs-dividend-investing/, I believe that there is nothing wrong with owning a great company that focuses on increases their intrinsic value by taking care of their own profit.

Have we been wrong about the underlying fundamental value of U.S. long bonds?

Value investor Guy Spier writes: «I try to avoid walking into the trap of making statements about any stocks that we currently own, since the situation might later change or I might discover that I was wrong.

You also could be wrong about the value of all the man - made, archaic rituals you perform to please your god.

I see life fall apart around me and I have no worries for myself — becuase I incorporate those teachings of Jesus in all my friendships and relationships — and I deal with the hard stuff — I take responsibility — I can say I am wrong — and I am accountable for my actions and the values I adopt.

It doesn't mean either of us is wrong for propogating our moral values.

What is amusing to me is that when an atheist claims to be «good» without God, they are generally basing their judgement of right and wrong on Western European value systems.

It appears that he's trying to sift history and take a more «nuanced» view of how history formed Christianity... I wasn't really getting a value judgment from him on the right or wrong, just that it's a mixed bag, like all history is.

The official publication of the Christian Booksellers» Association recently carried an article on trends in religious publishing which predicted more books on homosexuality «down the road (maybe five years or so)» and noted that just as there has been evidence of more compassion toward divorced persons, «Christians in the future will be saying homosexuality is still wrong but God loves homosexuals and values them as persons» (Bookstore Journal, January 1976).

That being said, Religion is a needed item to keep and maintain even the slimest of moral values, that draws the line between right and wrong.

Many of these are reinforced by group activities based on values clarification, which tend towards rejecting external moral restrictions and setting up the individual as the judge of what is right and wrong for them.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

Rose may be happy to see her values of right and wrong imposed on society at present but what will it mean when she herself is deemed at some time to be wrong on a socially disputed issue?

After all, most humans have been wrong in significant ways about moral values during most of history.

a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)

After years of dating the wrong guys, I'm finally with a man who shares my morals, values and love for God.

When people read old testament stories they do not research them or pray about them but see them as page value, this is wrong and we get a skewed picture of Yahweh.

Instead of seeing such traditional readings as naïve or simply wrong, interpreters now ask about the assumptions and values that govern the reading practices of Christian typological and allegorical exegesis and of Rabbinic midrash.

There is nothing wrong with Atheism, it certainly is more honest than those who use religion for political gain while ignoring the central values of the religion they profess to follow.

Some challenge specific parts of the curriculum (mandatory AIDS education, New York City's distribution of condoms to schoolchildren without the knowledge or consent of the parents, textbooks that propagate anti-Christian doctrines, gym - class dress requirements at odds with the modest dress required of Hindu, Muslim, and other children, «values clarification» classes that teach that there is no objective source of right and wrong, and so forth).

Redemption,» and he values a «serene inner character» and a «quiet but solid sense of right and wrong» more than his portfolio.

Today's world man has become with no value other than his organs if sold or stolen... so what is happening only proves that we are imposing marketing the wrongs against the rights... cultures and beliefs are going down the drain with all those values, morals, virtues some how turning into commotion among cultures and beliefs turning against each other misunderstanding each other or unaware of cultures way of living and beliefs to ease communication mutual understanding as a nation of mankind and a nation of faiths.

In a democracy of desire, money is the absolute good, from which all blessings flow, precisely because it is neutral in respect to values: it contains no judgments of better or worse, no directions about right or wrong.

Yet God is the One who values and uses, because God incorporates into the divine life which is everlasting the good that takes place in the historical sequence; and God overrules or uses for good that which comes from the «vain imagination of foolish men» in their sin and defection — and, we may add, from anything else that is evil or wrong thanks to the free decisions made by the creatures in their divinely granted capacity to choose among relevant possibilities.

«Life - style» justifies any way of life, as does «value» any opinion» (p. 235) Attempts by Freud and Marx and their followers to reshape our understandings are not only wrong, Bloom claims, but boring.

From this finding, he adduces that Weber was probably wrong in assuming the necessity of rationalized religion for establishing a uniform hierarchy of values that challenged traditionalism and supplied motivation for the pursuit of rational economic activities.

«Time is the healing river», said W. H. Auden; and there seems to be a way in which the worst of evils, which as evil are not to be welcomed nor valued, can be incorporated into some later ordering which may very well be all the deeper and more significant because it has absorbed and used that which in itself was horribly wrong.

The «highest» value - modality is the holy (characterized positively by the holy, negatively by the unholy); the next «highest» is the spiritual (characterized positively by the beautiful, the right, and the pure cognition of truth and negatively by the ugly, the wrong, and the positivistic quest of truth in terms of controlling nature); the third «highest» of the value - modalities is the vital (characterized positively by the noble and negatively by the vulgar); the next «highest» region is the useful (characterized positively by the useful and negatively by the nonuseful); and the «lowest» region is the.

The value of the Bible on this topic for Western history is that it gave us the tools to come to the conclusion that the practice was wrong.

Indeed, in a world of many points of view, there is a deep philosophical problem involved in trying to defend the claim that one point of view is right and all others wrong when fundamental beliefs and values are involved.

«Nationalism shows its character as a faith whenever national welfare or survival is regarded as the supreme end of life; whenever right and wrong are made dependent on the sovereign will of the nation, however determined; whenever religion and science, education and art, are valued by the measure of their contribution to national existence.»

The error arises from a wrong interpretation of the obvious fact that everybody wants to be a self, to have a sense of the value of his or her selfhood, and to realize, so far as may be, the potentialities given in that selfhood.

If I supported gay relationships and was wrong, I could be sinning by encouraging people to do something wrong, but if I opposed gay relationships and was wrong, I would be sinning by putting myself and others back under the law and making Christ «of no value.

While it is wonderful to obey God simply out of love for Him, it is not wrong to see the value in obeying Him to obtain a reward.

But as I urged above, it would be wrong (in my judgment) to try to interpret all this too literally and logically; Prof. Hartshorne was right, I said, in saying that the symbol of the divine Triunity, like the «incarnation» and «atonement» as symbols, is much more appropriately retained as a symbol, as imaginative proclamation; it can then retain its indicative and suggestive value without our seeking to phrase it in the idiom of some particular philosophy or world view.

Humanism was not wrong in thinking that truth, beauty, liberty, and equality are of infinite value, but in thinking that man can get them for himself without grace.