Not exact matches
Instead it feels very much like the «quality» Hollywood system — complete
with Judd Apatow's cameo as a truth - telling producer — pointing at a rank
outsider and noticing everything he did
wrong.
In general, pseudoscience is usually from
outsiders saying the people
with careers in the subject are all
wrong.
I could see some
outsider being prosecuted for illegal trespassing or theft, but if a trusted insider couldn't stomach continued cooperation, what would be criminally
wrong with whistleblowing or leaking?