Sentences with phrase «wrong with his comment»

Interesting how there's always those that criticize their grammar, their faith, their intelligence, or what every they can find wrong with a comment from someone they don't even know.

There are so many things wrong with your comment that an 8th grade science text can correct for you.

And what's wrong with his comment??

what's wrong with my comment?

there was nothing wrong with my comment.

I just stopped by Mama Moon's blog but there was something wrong with the comment box.

Deputy Communications Director of the party, Anthony Karbo, said he found nothing wrong with the comments by Mr. Agyapong, noting that the MP does not make allegations without evidence to back them.

Hope you guys already knew what went wrong with the comments.

Dude, whats wrong with ur comment?

You've single - handedly personified everything that's wrong with comments on this site and throughout the internet.

I usually tend to agree with Professor Lindzen, but I think there's something wrong with his comment about how we've already seen 86 % of the forcing from ghg's.

When you tap on this new downvote button in Facebook, it will provide a bunch of options to make it easier for the team to identify what's wrong with that comment.

Not exact matches

«My job is to say that when you hear sell everything, that comment is, one, most likely wrong, and two, most likely meant for someone with no memory or who can accept a buy everything back pitch the very next day,» the «Mad Money» host said.

A significant portion of the TSC hearing focused on Haldane's now famous Fish comment, as well as broader issues with economic forecasting — something that has come to the fore in the UK since economists were almost unanimously wrong in their predictions about the immediate impact of Brexit on the British economy.

Show me an editor who cares about comments, and that's someone with the wrong priorities.

What is most uncomfortable about the present market environment is that even some people whom we respect are tossing out comments about market valuation here that are provably wrong, or at least require one to dispense with the entirety of historical evidence if their optimistic views are to be correct.

And then you make the ironic comment of «What's wrong with people that can't see beyond their own nose and their own faults?»

I haven't seen this film, and so can not comment on it - but to all who lump atheists with communists, nazis, hedonists, and every other debased human quality, you are wrong.

I'd like to add to my last comment that first the myth that darwin became a christian and gave up his own theory is most likely fiction and propaganda for christians to call heresy on a christian boogeyman, but secondly in that myth it says that darwin renounced his own theory on his deathbed, thats what cari believes in refutation, but just because you might disbelieve a theory you came up with doesn't make the theory wrong.

Nice try with your disgusting comment, but all you did was prove how brainwashed you are and why your religion is so wrong for our society.

As far as I am concerned, most of the comments about the President's faith on this page, and the very topic of this article are what is wrong with Christianity.

You said you don't see the what's wrong with the Jihad comment?

Just to get the comments started, if my definition is correct, what, if anything, is wrong with the four men who «go to church» on the golf course?

I think your comment cuts to the core of what is wrong with this thinking.

The hatred and anger I'm seeing in these comments is PRECISELY what is wrong with our nation and is EXACTLY the cause of evil that we see in the news... peace and love conquers all.

As I've read through the comments I've once again been overcome by grief that theses conversations have to exist... that my gay brothers and sisters have to overcome the feeling that there is something wrong with them..

And I see nothing wrong with prohibiting comments on his video.

Also, There would be nothing wrong with negative comments if they didn't always turn into attacks on faith.

This week's Twitter outrage over Eugene Peterson's comments on homosexuality and the Church is an all - too - timely example of just how much havoc we can wreak on our own hearts when we engage with this culture in the wrong way.

Your comment shows your heart, you are not wrong for using the donations / tithes to survive so long as the church books / admin reflect whats going on to be transparent with your givers.

Maybe its just me but I can't find anywhere in this article or any of these comments where it says what organization Chik - fil - a gave to, and it gave food right, what wrong with free food, we all need to eat, we are all people.

i long with you david... and i myself stumble in my own awkward efforts toward freedom, and as you said, we know the fact is that it is scary to move into freedom... because it is unknown... but i see so many on this newfound road to freedom get trapped in the liminal space of wish - fullfillment community (which actually rather looks like affinity rather than the hard - won community that comes from communitas)... i'm sure this is going to come off the wrong way, but i'm going to say it anyway: many of the comments seem to be «all about me», and truly that is what religion is... but not freedom, not the mission of Jesus where you die to yourself by taking up your cross daily... not being centered on the «other» rather than yourself...

It is really sad to see the comments on here... I see nothing but hate, politics, and nothing about the 20 poor little angels and 6 adults who were masacared... does anybody see something wrong with this picture.

Update: Since reading other comments on this topic I realised that I was doing 2 things wrong, as I live in the south of Spain with temperaturas over 30ºc at the moment I need to soak the almonds in the fridge not just in the kitchen, plus the bottle I used wasn't airtight.

I try to come back and comment again after actually making the dish but see nothing wrong with giving a shout out to something that just * looks * amazing: --RRB-

Before anyone chooses to down - vote this comment, then how about you actually try to come up with a response and tell me why I'm wrong.

Mate, I will be more than happy to apologise and swallow my comments regarding Wilshere... No problems... I do not believe I will have to, but I would be more than willing to do so... He needs to stay fit (which I don't believe he will just because of the way he plays) and perform with consistence (I don't think he can reach another level... Just hoping I am wrong).

The FA overturn a horrendously wrong decision with a dismissive comment that no action will be taken against the innocent player!!!

Third Man, You and I and fair minded fans know it, but those «one eyed see no wrong with Wenger» fans will never accept your totally true comment.

There is something wrong with my SPAM program and it is moderating nearly all the comments.

Rudiger says he was not injured for the clash at the St Mary's Stadium and has attempted to clarify his comments in an interview with ZDF, translated by the Metro, as he feels Conte may have taken them the wrong way.

That comment you have just said is all that is wrong with the modern football fan.

Should have «been professional» when questioned on his prospects of leaving, whats wrong with saying» no comment until further notice»?

Your comments on Stan are valid but seeing fans who voice discontentment with the status quo as becoming part of the problem is IMO wrong.

Deluded manager plus greedy board has created a crisis at arsenal with third rate players being paid first rate wages to keep them loyal and drugged up fans like yourself overdosing on 4th place high... True fans want change when they see the club going in wrong direction not a string of drug crazed platitudes from tribal loyalists who are so deluded themselves that they actually believe the blame for the crisis lies with the people who have been pointing to its causes... Do you think financial crises only happen because people start warning about overlevaraged banks, the speculative and fraudulent behaviour of their overpaid employees and the indulgence of their massively overpaid senior management... Pathetic comment

his comments abt man city spending to justify not spending sums up his intentions.AND TO KNOW THAT THE MAN HAS GOT SO MANY OTHER FRANCHISES / CLUBS IN USA JUST GOES ONTO SHOW HE AI NT SERIOUS WITH EITHER OF THEM, RATHER ITS ALL ABT ACQUIRING MORE WEALTH.COS LETS BE HONEST, U CANT MANAGE WELL SO MANY TEAMS.IF AN OWNER REALLY HAD ANY INTENTION TO IMPROVE, THEN THEY WUD HAV MAYBE 1 OR AT MAX 2 TEAMS AND FOCUS ON THEM.i maybe wrong, but stan gives me all the wrong vibes.whatever ppl say abt man city, i got ta admit they are giving their best for the club.a good finance manager and a level - headed coach will fix their problem of excessive spending!

Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

The forward really came back with a bang after his frustrating spell on the sidelines and Coquelin was quick to point out that Giroud has always proven his many doubters wrong since coming to the club and the English Premier League a few years ago, but in a way these comments could be taken as a proof that perhaps the big man is the perfect player to have on the bench as he will want to come on and prove himself once again.

Very harsh on chambers the kid was solid did nothing wrong how is he in decline the kid keeps improving with every game pathetic comments about his performance!