Typing «What's
wrong with teacher evaluation» into search engines produces pages of well - reasoned thought and evidence, not just angry rants.
In this episode of the EdNext podcast, Marty West talks with Chad Aldeman, a principal at Bellwether Education Partners who worked as a policy advisor at the U.S. Department of Education, about what went right and what went
wrong with teacher evaluation reform.
Not exact matches
(Right) New York City Chancellor Carmen Fariña testifies about what she thinks is
wrong with Gov. Cuomo's
teacher evaluation proposal.
Also in this issue: A look back at what the Obama administration's signature education reform got
wrong,
with lessons learned to guide states and districts in refining their
teacher evaluation systems, and a warning on the limits of federally - led school reform; a proposal for how to redesign education research under the Every Student Succeeds Act; and a debate on whether there is a federal constitutional right to education.
Ritz says Bennett took Indiana «in the
wrong direction» when it came to quality classroom instruction, an argument that resonated
with educators dissatisfied
with high stakes testing and
teacher evaluations.
And that any normal political candidate would have worked diligently to persuade
teachers that he understood that he had been
wrong to propose doing away
with tenure; that given a second term he would de-couple
teacher evaluation from unfair standardized testing; that he would settle the critically important CCEJF school funding lawsuit in order to ensure that long after he has left office Connecticut would have a school funding formula that was both constitutional and successfully guaranteed that every Connecticut public school had the resources need to ensure their students had the education they deserved.
Something is dramatically
wrong with this recent wave in education
with student assessment and
teacher evaluation and this trend must be stopped!!!