Sentences with phrase «wrong word about»

This makes internet discussion especially difficult, as one wrong word about your favourite Zelda snowballs into a tirade against you, immediately souring proceedings.
The only people who've said one wrong word about me coming out were in the church (which isn't nearly as many people here), and not even all of them.

Not exact matches

What could possibly be wrong with saying kind words about someone's abilities?
One word that makes us happy: Progress [21:21] We grow because that helps us give more — share it with someone you love, it magnifies it [22:04] More excited about feeding one billion people than any material thing, so much more meaning when it's not just about you [22:19] The challenge is our brain: it's looking for what's wrong, because that helps you survive [22:30] Peak state = high energy, feel extraordinary, producing results is easy [22:46] Low energy state = say things and do things that hurt your relationship [23:39] Peak State = Beautiful state, Low - energy state = suffering state [24:08] Over achievers don't suffer, right?
I DO N'T THINK OPHRA GETS IT WRONG... I THINK ATHEIST GET WRONG... ITS NOT ABOUT A WORD «GOD» ITS NOT ABOUT AN ENERGY «SPRIT» AND YES IT IS ABOUT THE AWE OF IT ALL....
I will admit that I talked to my mother today about it when I visited her and she had her doubts about him... serious doubts, so I might have to be a man of my word on this one and admit I was wrong on this one.
He's wrong about Hitler; he was German Catholic, and Lutheran teachings helped form his worldview (look it up if you don't want to take my word for it).
Hey these are not my words I am just showing the book You think studnts are getting purposefully wrong info about gay Yes, and often enough in the name of two current fads: diversity and democ.
I would agree that both atheists and believers alike tend to lash out here with words and name calling that is unnecessary, but you are wrong about them loving themselves, and you are wrong about their morals and values.
It is a chance to say a word about their lives as a kind of testimony in miniature or to add a coda to the sermon by pointing out something that, in their opinion, the preacher left out or got wrong.
In other words, its basically giving the young African Americans the wrong idea about what they (NAACP) are truly here to do.
As I continued to puzzle in various Christmas morning pews, I still sensed something wrong in this way of thinking about the Word made flesh.
Thank you for giving me the chance to express out but still I am hurt and a nice word will cool it of and guide me if wrong and about quitting I would because what I am doing now at CNN is taking almost my whole time since the Quran burnning issue and would out doubt I will go back to it and that's why I mentioned earlier that we back here worry about our daily bread and water for family support but needed from you in the free world to notice us out there and have your say on behalf of all heavenly beliefs that what is happening is wrong, One Nation Calamities to other nations benefit, profit?!
In other words, even if all the facts were wrong, the Bible could be a true and accurate account of those things about which it speaks.
I would not accuse him of «complicity in the explicit slander»» his words about Obama's view of America» of the Church for saying things other Catholics, including me sometimes, find wrong.
To the person who heard that word of wisdom as with all words of prophecy I would encourage you to bring it to God and see what he says - sometimes people get things wrong but also sometimes the words given can be about events not now but to come
I have never thought about this, no matter what some people assume, the word leader is definately more likely to give the wrong image of the role.
scott god also told us not to judge, so let cleflo do cleflo and you do you if you do nt understand how to percieve gods word than it could also be you i remember when i first got saved i was taught a lots of religion stuff but i kept running after god and not after man and he revile some things to me thur his holy spirit watch what you say about gods people cause we all have issues and with that being said be blessed and if hes doing wrong by gods word than he has to answer to god not you so why set yourself up to be curse for it god do nt need your help in nothing stay free cause who god set free is free indeed.
Putting any personal statement in the letters over the words of Jesus to underline a personal opinion about truth is the wrong chronology.
Either administering is an essential mode of ministry of the Word, or else the Reformers were entirely wrong about universal priesthood and Christian vocation.
We still use words like «should» and «ought,» «right» and «wrong,» «naughty» and «nice»; and we still talk about things like «virtues» and «duties» and «rights.»
If after careful thought and reasoning you can come up with positive words such as «bad,» «wrong,» and «awful», it says a lot about your reasoning skills!
He got 3 things completely wrong about me within the first 5 lines of his 1,000 + word essay.
In other words, the modern - war pacifists get it wrong: their contingent judgment does not describe a permanent truth about warfare in the modern age.
Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,
Martin Luther presented the theology of Sola scriptura that the bible is the sole source to live and understand what Christianity is all about... but the bible itself does not come with a table of contents to prove that it is correct which is why the bible itself says that the CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this teaching.
They seem to love using all the gadgets that prove the power of Science so they can spread the word that Science is wrong and the psychotic bleatings of a few sheep herders 2000 years ago, who thought that the wind blowing meant god had indigestion, are the only ones who know what they are talking about.
Though the Ctatholics are definetly wrong there is something very flawed with his logic about pagan stories being bundled together they was huge part of the bible they was in many places the hebrews came and went is it possible pagans knew the story of Abraham and Isaac of course I am sure word spread like wild fire not to mention is how do you know if they are pagan stories or true stories that the pagans decided to tell sounds to me like he just doesn't want to be held accountable.
I did not say you were wrong about what Christians are saying that is unloving and unkind toward other Christians I just meant there is an extreme that can drive us in the wrong direction if we live just by our emotions because we can not fully trust them without leaning on the Word of God.
We looked at this idea yesterday, and I have one more post about it tomorrow, but having read this post today, can you say that this post saved you from believing something wrong about the word saved?
People today have decided what is convienient for them, what suits their needs and requirements, what they believe is right verses wrong with total comphehensive disregard on how the Creator, Jehovah God feels about matters through his word the Bible.
Don't be lied to about what the Bible says from them but study the word cry out to God and He will make it known what is right and wrong.
So to express the fact about the believer life is not a wrong but «God bless you» is words of faith.
For another group, those same words represent just about everything that's wrong with the world.
«Settling» is the wrong word, perhaps, for my parents continued to be deeply devout, and we prayed together about everything; however, our lack of a faith community affected all of us.
Yes... so you come here and read and write for what reasons... to prove you are RIGHT... to find someone else to prove to you are RIGHT... because you might be WRONG... an old friend of mine said it is interesting that with only one letter switched around within the word SCARED changes it completely to SACRED... think about it, I think that is one reason you might be here.
I'll assume from that, that you realize your ridiculous rant on the use of the word reference and your equally ridiculous rant about the way Christine paraphrased a particular reference was in fact a useless waste of time that had nothing to do with the discussion at hand but you just can't bring yourself to admit you were wrong.
Wrong, he was a wolf in sheeps clothing, one of many who have been written about in the Word of God, the bible.
You have to admit though — everyone believes something and I using the word believe to mean not fully able to know all knowledge about everything in the world, and so we guess based on the knowledge of what we know, and assume we are right until some other data comes into our life to prove us wrong.
There is nothing wrong per se about adding in this type of wording, and anything that encourages some sort of shade preservation or restoration is a positive move.
he still has KNJ's back and he hasn't spoken a word of shit about Seattle besides he thinks they used him wrong.
Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!
Yes, it produces less bodies but... I'm just not really sold on a bunch of «projects»... just hoping the MN scouting reports say something about the later round picks that isn't general knowledge (in other words, I hope I'm dead wrong).
Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene
How often after a defeat we listen to Arsene Wenger talk about focusing on the next game, well he had three days to focus on what went wrong in the cup final and more than enough time to correct it, yet against the same opposition the same result, but Arsene Wegner continues to talk about players lacking in confidence, the mental strenght and all the usual excuses made by Arsene Wegner, so how does the all seeing all knowing wise one explain Wigan Athletic and Liverpool beating Man city, well my advise to Arsene Wegner is if he really understand the word focus he would F --- k — Of ---- Cause — U ---- S --- t. WEGNER OUT.
But no doubt if this happens you will play the victim and spread the word about how you have been wronged.
You might say, «Use your words to tell me what's wrong and what you're mad about
When we read Holt's How Children Fail, it was an epiphany for both of us, putting words to what had always felt wrong to us about our school experiences.
You can talk to them about what they've done wrong till you're blue in the face but all those words will be completely lost on them.
There's a lot of bitch on bitch going on, and no matter how hard we try, how gently we weigh our words, there will always be one that is misread, one that feels wronged, because she doesn't adhere to what you are saying... I wrote about it a while back http://mamapoekie.blogspot.com/2010/05/us-vs-them.html
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z