Secondly, that in the case of
wrongful removals from one country to another, the welfare principle is determinative.
Not exact matches
«The purpose of our article is to explain why a blanket disregard for eyewitness confidence is not only at odds with what has been learned in recent years but can also contribute to both the
wrongful conviction of innocent suspects and the unwarranted
removal from suspicion of a guilty suspect,» the researchers write.
Whether you have been injured in a car, truck or motorcycle accident, construction accident, a slip and fall, or you have lost a loved one and need help with a
wrongful death lawsuit, our team is well prepared to assist you.Additionally, we have experience in several niche areas of personal injury law, including laser hair
removal injuries, nursing home negligence and injuries caused by falls
from above - ground pool ladders.
In this regard, the Court held — citing cases in Indiana and Texas (Ortman v. Ortman, 670 NE2d 1317 (Ind); Matter of Lewin, 149 SW3d 727 (Tex]-RRB--- that «[t] he appellant may not decide the timing and forum of the custody proceeding through
wrongful removal of the child
from the jurisdiction.»
B), and its implementing legislation, the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), 42 U.S.C. § § 11601 - 11610 (2000), were adopted to «protect children
from the harmful effects of their
wrongful removal or retention and to establish procedures to ensure their prompt return to the State of habitual residence, as well ast o secure protection for rights of access.»
The Preamble states that the Hague Convention seeks «to protect children internationally
from the harmful effects of their
wrongful removal or retention and to establish procedures to ensure their prompt return to the State of their habitual residence, as well as to secure protection for the rights of access.»
The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction («the child abduction Hague Convention») is a treaty which aims to protect children
from the harmful effects of international
wrongful removal or...
Vancouver BC Family Child Abduction Lawyers help prevent BC child abduction by obtaining orders and putting protections in place to prevent the
wrongful removal of children
from BC.
Where a child has been wrongfully removed or retained in terms of Article 3 and, at the date of the commencement of the proceedings before the judicial or administrative authority of the Contracting State where the child is, a period of less than one year has elapsed
from the date of the
wrongful removal or retention, the authority concerned shall order the return of the child forthwith.
We provide advice that covers all aspects of insolvency disputes,
from asset investigations and realisations
from debtors and delinquent directors on behalf of office holders, to
wrongful trading advice to boards of companies and retention of title, asset
removal, dividend claims by creditors and defending winding - up petitions.
Article 15 The judicial or administrative authorities of a Contracting State may, prior to the making of an order for the return of the child, request that the applicant obtain
from the authorities of the State of the habitual residence of the child a decision or other determination that the
removal or retention was
wrongful within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention, where such a decision or determination may be obtained in that State.
In an earlier post, I discuss in detail the objective and mechanism of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, 25 October 1980, 19 ILM 1501, to discourage the
wrongful removal of a child
from his or her habitual residence and the mechanism of «prompt return» of the child to his or her habitual residence.