Mr. Dyson
wrote about the carbon dioxide question in 1977, in a paper laying out a form of climate management or geo - engineering.
Not exact matches
[AR: We and others have
written reams
about the dubious
carbon -
dioxide benefits of biofuel choices that are available now or in the near term.
I'll be
writing more on the scope of what would have to happen to stop the buildup of
carbon dioxide at just
about any of the concentration peaks that have been tossed around lately as either «safe» or not totally calamitous.
In 2009, when the E.P.A. first exerted its authority to rein in
carbon dioxide, I
wrote a post that in part looked back at Scalia's skepticism
about this gas fitting under a statute created to cut eye - stinging, lung - searing smog.
The reporter, Karen Youso,
wrote that the city's tree - lighting practices, with 60,000 incandescent bulbs burning around the clock for five and a half weeks, costs
about $ 1,300 and results in 18.7 tons of
carbon dioxide, the main heat - trapping emission from human activities.
I've
written off and on
about how the divide in the United States over how quickly to curb
carbon dioxide emissions has little to do with the now familiar red state versus blue state dynamic, and is more
about which regions have grids and economies most wedded to coal and oil, and which don't.
You
write: «And, speaking of short periods of time on which to be drawing conclusions: the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, correlating
carbon dioxide increases with temperature increases, is based on only
about 23 years — 1975 - 1998.
In the conclusion to his «Plan B» chapter (p 228), Bob Carter
writes: «It is therefore time to move away from stale «he - says - she - says» arguments
about whether human
carbon dioxide emissions are causing dangerous warming, and on to designing effective policies of hazard management for all climate change, based on adaptation responses that are tailored for individual countries or regions... By their very nature, strategies that can cope with the dangers and vagaries of natural climate change will readily cope with human - caused change too should it ever become manifest.»
«If the proposal is approved by the state's Public Utilities Commission,» I
wrote, «California's
carbon dioxide emissions will either increase or decline far less than if Diablo Canyon's two reactors, which generated
about 9 percent of the state's electricity last year, remained in operation.
I am
writing to address the request for comments
about «climate intervention» research (Page 22, lines 31 - 42), with a particular focus on how the USGCRP can design their research coordination efforts around «
carbon removal» (also called «
carbon dioxide removal» or «CDR») most effectively.
The first examines atmospheric concentrations of
carbon dioxide, concluding that the nineteenth century «background level» was 274 - 292 ppm — still considered a valid estimate — and that the increase to the date of
writing was
about 6 per cent.
Callendar's own calculations, giving a 2 °C temperature rise for a
carbon dioxide doubling, were slated: one major criticism was that they dealt only with radiation and left out the effects of that other important way in which heat is moved around, convection, despite what Hulburt had already
written about that.
You
write: «And, speaking of short periods of time on which to be drawing conclusions: the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, correlating
carbon dioxide increases with temperature increases, is based on only
about 23 years -1975-1998.
If you
write that the atmospheric concentration of
carbon dioxide is «widely accepted as being
about 350 parts per million», and walk away, it doesn't do much good for me to answer that it is known with high confidence to be between 385 and 390 parts per million (in 2009, on a global annual average).