Sentences with phrase «wrote in his new testament»

The Apostle Peter wrote in his New Testament epistle, First Peter: Judgment will begin at the house of faith, and if the righteous are scarcely saved, where will the ungodly and sinner appear [on the Day of Judgment]?

is because that's what it's written in the New Testament.

The Apostle Paul wrote in his New Testament epistle (I Corinthians.12) that anyone who says that «Jesus is Lord», are not only professing their allegiance to Jesus, but they were also only able to do this by the spirit of God.

What is written in the New Testament testifies to what happened; but what is there written is not a correct description of what happened.

If horses... If you don't understand my «overriding» comments and think they are «convenient», then you probably don't realize that is what is written in the New Testament.

As is written in the New Testament in the book of Revelation, chapter 3, I believe... God calls Christians, who act like this, lukewarm and He will spew us out of His mouth.

By virtue of being canonized in Holy Scripture, the many pieces of apocalyptic writing in the New Testament, including the Apocalypse of John, have become permanently associated with the cardinal Christian doctrine of the expectation of the Second Coming of Christ, as expressed in the Creed: «He shall come again with glory to judge both the living and the dead and his kingdom shall have no end.»

Not exact matches

The Christian Scripture (New Testament) WAS written in Greek.

The word «Antichrist» itself is so compelling that were there only one verse in the New Testament that used it, the commentators across the centuries would still have written enormous commentaries on that verse.

The New Testament was compiled (not written) in about the year 200, from materials written by St Paul, St John and others.

In the New Testament, James wrote «If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.

This coptic writing was not written and approved by the Romans like the New Testament was in the 3rd and 4th century.

(The Gospel of Mark was the first written of the four Gospels in, say, the A.D. 60 ′ s. And 1st Thessalonians was the first New Testament book, written in A.D. 52).

actually the torah old testament was Iron age the new testament was written in the beginning of the dark ages

In fact the new testament wasn't collected until at least 96 after the death of Christ, which means being a Christian had nothing to do with the New Testament, since it wasn't written ynew testament wasn't collected until at least 96 after the death of Christ, which means being a Christian had nothing to do with the New Testament, since it wasn't writestament wasn't collected until at least 96 after the death of Christ, which means being a Christian had nothing to do with the New Testament, since it wasn't written yNew Testament, since it wasn't wriTestament, since it wasn't written yet.

«If the New Testament books really were inspired by an omnipotent God, why was He unable to prevent their being changed within decades of being written, by people acting in His name?»

And to say that Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.

The New Testament is written in various other languages such as Greek and some Aramaic.

The author summarizes the agreements among scholars about the New Testament texts and the problems they face in trying to recover the historical Jesus — the lack of eyewitnesses and the fact that the Gospels were not written individually and probably not by the authors to which they were traditionally ascribed.

The Bible is the only Holy book written by numerous authors that are all in agreement and show how the Father's plan of salvation was set before the creation of the world, then tells us of His time here on earth in the New Testament and also explains the tribulations of the end times and how false religions will abound and that we can be ready for His return so that we can all spend eternity with Him in Heaven.

In response to a great question from Chuck McKnight on my post Why God Never Punishes Sin, I decided I had better write a short post about the Greek words kolazo and kolasis, specifically in reference to some of the New Testament uses of the word «punishment.&raquIn response to a great question from Chuck McKnight on my post Why God Never Punishes Sin, I decided I had better write a short post about the Greek words kolazo and kolasis, specifically in reference to some of the New Testament uses of the word «punishment.&raquin reference to some of the New Testament uses of the word «punishment.»

The basic ideas of the cult are easily accessible in a vast array of written and material remains from the New Testament world.

Nearly every book in the New Testament states the author, and we have the early Church Fathers who wrote and verified nearly the entire new TestamaNew Testament states the author, and we have the early Church Fathers who wrote and verified nearly the entire new Testamanew Testamant.

The new testament (Hebrews 8:8) * And in the Torah, the old testament (Jeremiah 31:31) What names are written on the kingdom gates of new Jerusalem coming down to earth?

The Holy Bible especially the New Testament was passed down by Jesus Christ Himself to the Apostles who in turn passed it down by word of mouth and in writing.

In the Old Testament, the divine law was written onto two tablets of stone, but in the New Testament, the divine law is written on our hearts (Romans 2:1In the Old Testament, the divine law was written onto two tablets of stone, but in the New Testament, the divine law is written on our hearts (Romans 2:1in the New Testament, the divine law is written on our hearts (Romans 2:15)

Rudolf Bultmann, the German New Testament scholar whose program for the «demythologization» of the Gospel provoked a storm of controversy in the years after World War II, wrote in his seminal essay: «It is impossible to use electric light and the wireless and to avail ourselves of....

The New Testament scholars say it was written while Paul was in prison, but it repeatedly speaks of Christian joy.

But the immigration judge was distressed that «Li claimed that Thanksgiving was a Christian holiday» and «knew little about the differences between the Old and New Testaments» — though Li noted that the Old Testament was written in Hebrew and the...

Ahmad Khan was also involved in a controversy with the Christian missionaries which led him to write a commentary on the Bible, in which he showed that many Muslim religious scholars, such as Bukhari, did not believe that the words of the Old Testament and the New Testament had suffered from interpolation at the hands of the Jews and the Christians.

And the book also offers a deliberately wide array of approaches to trinitarian issues, including not only historical and systematic theologians, but biblical scholars and analytic philosophers of religion, writing from a variety of theological and communal points of view» Roman Catholic, Protestant, and, in one case, Jewish (the New Testament scholar Alan Segal, who contributes an instructive if somewhat technical chapter on the role of conflicts between Jews and Christians in the emergence of early trinitarian teaching).

It occurs only twice in the New Testament — here, and in Ephesians 1:6, where Paul writes that all Christians have been adopted as children of God through Jesus Christ and have been «blessed / graced» (same verb Luke uses with the root xaris).

I should say at the outset that none of this literature is written by scholars trained in New Testament or early Christian studies teaching at the major, or even the minor, accredited theological seminaries, divinity schools, universities, or colleges of North America or Europe (or anywhere else in the world).

In comparison to the New Testament where Paul's letters were written starting 15 years after Jesus» ascension, the first gospel, Mark written 25 years after (Peter was the source of Mark), Matthew who was an eye witness at 35 years, and Luke 35 years as a careful Roman / Greek trained historian who interviewed living eye witnesses such as Mary, mother of Jesus.

That original Islam is only hinted at in the Qur» an and the Hadith, which were written years after the prophet Mohammed had his mystical experience — just as the original precepts of Christianity are minimized and only obliquely presented in the New Testament and its «authorized» translations, interpretations and commentaries, which were written over many years, well after Jesus» ministry and Paul's mystical experience.

Heck, he might just change his mind and write a whole new rulebook at the last minute, maybe call it the New Testament, and then only people who are left handed are allowed in heavnew rulebook at the last minute, maybe call it the New Testament, and then only people who are left handed are allowed in heavNew Testament, and then only people who are left handed are allowed in heaven.

But a couple of bona fide scholars — not professors teaching religious studies in universities but scholars nonetheless, and at least one of them with a Ph.D. in the field of New Testament — have taken this position and written about it.

In fact, the authors of those New Testament texts were undoubtedly drawing from very similar instructions written by Aristotle, Philo and Josephus, known well throughout the Greco - Roman world.

(I've written extensively about the household codes of the New Testament in this blog post, in this series, and in three of my books, including the soon - to - be-released Inspired.)

«Although some notable New Testament scholars affirm traditional Johannine scholarship, the majority do not believe that John or one of the Apostles wrote it, and trace it instead to a «Johannine community» which traced its traditions to John; the gospel itself shows signs of having been composed in three «layers», reaching its final form about 90 - 100 AD.»

The earliest of the New Testament writings also refer to it; in his letters, Paul wrote with passion and complete confidence about the approaching time when

That «sheol» or sprit world afterlife was in fact an Old Testament and even Torah - based belief and within that spiritual realm of sheol those spirits (all the spirits who were once living) were in either a state of happiness or in a state of limited ability to obtain happiness, or in other words a state of damnation or being in like a spiritual prison, which would later be further described in the New Testament (which the earliest figured written versions of the New Testament were written in Greek for newly gentile converts) as hell.

He wrote, in New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism, «For some readers of the Bible rhetorical criticism may have an appeal lacking to other modern critical approaches, in that it comes closer to explaining what they want explained in the text: not its sources, but its power.»

«I often have the impression that my conservative New Testament colleagues feel very uncomfortable, for I see them perpetually engaged in salvage operations,» he wrote in 1927.

Dan Baker, in his interesting and I think helpful book, What Happy People Know, reminds me of the New Testament, as well as Kubler - Ross, when he writes: In the ultimate analysis, human beings have.in his interesting and I think helpful book, What Happy People Know, reminds me of the New Testament, as well as Kubler - Ross, when he writes: In the ultimate analysis, human beings have.In the ultimate analysis, human beings have...

Keep in mind that the New Testament of the Bible was written decades after Jesus supposedly died, by people who never met Jesus and relied on tales told from one generation to the next.

Lightfoot (1658) summed the need of one seeking true understanding (and not interpretation) up well: «For, first, when all the books of the New Testament were written by Jews, and among Jews, and unto them; and when all the discourses made there, were made in like manner by Jews, and to Jews, and among them; I was always fully persuaded, as of a thing past all doubting, that that Testament could not but everywhere taste of and retain the Jews» style, idiom, form, and rule of speaking.»

Jesus gave so clear a picture of what a life centered in the love of God and expressing itself in love for others would be that, when the New Testament was written in Greek, the meaning of agape was transformed.

But Christians believe that the bible was written by man and inspired by God, surely youve read that in the bible in the New Testament.

Since the Catholic Church in 451 A.D. had so grossly departed from the Biblical faith, why do you respect, receive and follow the Chalcedonian Creed, as if it were written by the Apostles and included in the New Testament?