Sentences with phrase «x amount of»

Other than posting free space requirements for over-the-air iOS updates (e.g. in order to OTA update to iOS 11 you'll need X amount of free space) they don't talk much about the matter.

Tapping either the «Priority «or «None «options would then present the already - confused user with even more options: «Indefinitely» and «For X amount of time.»

When you purchase renters insurance, you don't have to prove that you have X amount of stuff or provide the insurance company with a list of your possessions, but it makes sense to do so.

Your doctor won't spend as much time with you because she will only be reimbursed X amount of money.

If you can convince someone to pay x amount of money for your old car, then by all means, your car is worth x amount of money.

«First, it takes that leap of faith where somebody's going to come up with some kind of new type of if - then situation: If you go and do this on your trip and this happens, then we'll pay you out X amount of dollars.»

It's my job to come in and say to those firms, «We give you X amount of dollars of work, you really need to consider giving us fixed rates.

«IT says it takes a month, will cost X amount of money, and by the way, you'll need to buy an extra server.»

When my father - in - law died a couple years ago and my wife and I were dealing with his estate we found an estate attorney in the city where he lives in, and up front he says, «It's gonna cost X amount of money for all this work that I'm gonna have to do», and it was a flat fee, fixed fee.

Hence, the judge will award x amount of dollars toward that spouses «income» column, owed by the working spouse, to the spouse doing all of the work at home.

It's usually applied to a situation where you are injured by somebody's conduct and miss X amount of weeks of work.

The proper way to respond to the user's deletion request would be «your data will be kept in a secure server for the purposes of maintaining an audit trail for x amount of time.

With subscription billing a client pays a monthly fee, which entitles him or her to x amount of work, or, e g., to so many contracts, etc..

Then, if the collection company does ANYTHING (calls you, sends a letter) after your proper notice of dispute of the alleged debt, then each act is a violation of consumer laws and will warrant x amount of payment from them: The Fed's FDCA (Fair Debt Collection Act) allows up to $ 1,000 per violation for acts after receiving your proper notice of dispute to the debt.

For certain things like employee handbooks, they may already kind of be doing it on a flat - fee basis sort of, because they've realized that their clients only want to pay so much for it, or it generally takes X amount of time and that times my hourly rate is Y amount, so I'm just going to quote them that.

Let's say tuition for law school was a base amount, for example $ 12,000.00, with the understanding (well, an understanding in the form of a contract), that five years after graduating if you are making over X amount of dollars, you give a certain amount back to the school.

It's extremely frustrating to have someone with the same education, license, and responsibility as you to condescend and demean you because they have X amount of years more in practice.

My other partner, Mark Brockhaus, who's more of our financial guy, still likes to tell me that we could be renting out those parking spaces for X amount of dollars each month.

They generally follow the same narrative arch: «I paid X amount of dollars and the lawyer did nothing for me.

So, one can't accurately state if we add X amount of CO2 (or any other GHG) that we will retain Y amount of heat.

However the smaller parcel of land needed to grow X amount of food using conventional agriculture, as well as the surrounding landscape, will be much more heavily impacted than the larger parcel of land needed if we opt for organic agriculture instead.

If we want to grow X amount of food conventional farming practices will require less land (thanks to higher yields) than we would need using organic agriculture.

I think your criticisms about assumptions are fair, but perhaps a better way of looking at this post is not so much «CO2 caused x amount of warming,» but rather «CO2 COULD N'T HAVE CAUSED MORE THAN x amount of warming,» thereby invalidating the claims of catastrophe.

The creation directly of Thermal IR heating to land and sea in raising the temperature of the Earth which then radiates out x amount of Thermal IR, and, the creation of heat from Life itself as it uses these different energies, including the Solar of the cartoon, to convert to chemical and mechanical uses which enable Life to flourish and in turn radiate out Thermal IR.

Unless the companies put x amount of dollars into a fund for tearing them down you know how this works.

Since we can't even measure this effect directly, how can one say that cycle 23 should have contributed X amount of increased condensation nuclei from the slight / modest increase in galactic cosmic rays vs cycle 22?

-- It is common sense that if Man puts x amount of CO2 into the air, and the CO2 amount in the air goes up by x / 2 while the ocean acidifies, this is cause and effect in its plainest exposition.

That is, X amount of CO2 produces Y amount of warming.

We don't know how much climate change will be caused by X amount of CO2, nor how much of that climate change will manifest as increased precipitation, and where.

«Funding wind farms that reduce emissions by x amount of tons does.»

If one's hypothesis is correct about man - made global warming, then X amount of CO2 over time period Y should result in temperature Z.

So even though we can calculate that x amount of heat will be «thrown» at the earth in a given period, we can not predict with sufficient accurately how much of it will heat the earth.

The Warsaw outcome mentions for the first time «nationally determined contributions» to reducing GHG emissions, reflecting a step away from a global budget approach (whereby we say that the supposedly «safe» temperature increase of 2 degrees could only be achieved if we emit X amount of carbon, and the game is to then decide who can emit what share) to a «pledge and review» approach (Whereby countries «pledge» to do what is «nationally appropriate» given their circumstances).

In the simpelist terms I can state that based on historical evidence x amount of increase in CO2 will equal y amount of temperature increase as for instance IPCC models.

The second question, which may also be unanswerable, but I think is answerable, with enough study, is, will doubling the amount of carbon dioxide etc. in the atmosphere cause x amount of warming, or more, or less?

In which case, you should make absolutely crystal clear that logo concepts require thorough briefs and make sure you add a clause in your written proposal, saying that the price includes X amount of logo concepts and not the final logo they choose.

The algorithm is this: museum curator is equal to museum director recommendation over museum fiscal budget multiplied by critical acclaim over academic achievement lesser then the current market price divided by current stock market yields is multiplied by the X amount of press given to a sell equals the museum purchase of an art piece.

do you guys have it bad sometimes) and you're designing a logo, state: «This cost includes X amount of logo concepts only.

Most of the objectives revolve around killing bosses or killing X amount of enemies.

There are only three types of quests: collect X amount of a certain item, kill X amount of small creatures, or take on one big, badass monster.

The problem with Shattered Crystal was that the game forced roadblocks upon the player if they didn't pick up X amount of collectibles, prompting constant backtracking through already long and dreary action stages.

Kill X amount of bad guys.

Even today, it still speaks volumes because lately everyone is pinning Nintendo as doomed because the WiiU isn't selling X amount of units.

This fact alone cancels out the «kill X amount of enemies in a certain way» achievements as well.

You will be asked to do things like defend a certain area for X amount of rounds, eliminate all enemies on the map and take down walls of defense, but it always comes down to just killing everything in your way.

So if you start a mission in concealment and have to complete the mission in X amount of turns, the True Concealment mod will stop the turn counter going down until you break concealment, affording you the time to set up your first ambush or just plan out your assault.

As you go along your merry way laying waste to the aliens you'll be given various tasks I.E Kill 40 enemies in X amount of time, completing this objective while online will send it to other players who can tap there «Cheer» button helping you build a meter for a special attack, naturally you do this back on the left hand of the already cluttered HUD.

This is when I started looking back to before trophies and achievements existed, to see what it was in a game that kept me enthralled, whether it was to get X amount of skill capes in Runescape or own the most amount of thrones on Habbo Hotel or get top in every online match in Halo or Call of Duty.

And these bonus objectives are simple but fun, such as landing two 360s, finishing the level in x amount of seconds, or completing the level without letting go of the accelerate button.

The aforementioned goals for each level typically boil down to «kill X amount of soldiers.»