Not exact matches
To the surprise of everyone who knew about the strong evidence for the little ice age and the medieval
climate optimum, the graph showed a nearly constant temperature from the
year 1000 until about 150
years ago, when the temperature began to rise abruptly like the blade of a hockey stick.
During what geoscientists called the Miocene
Climate Optimum, roughly 15 million
years ago when temperatures and CO2 levels were higher than today, the reefs around the Maldives atolls were flourishing.
The Holocene
Climate Optimum was a period of global climate warming that occurred between six to nine thousand yea
Climate Optimum was a period of global
climate warming that occurred between six to nine thousand yea
climate warming that occurred between six to nine thousand
years ago.
Gran Canaria has
optimum conditions for producing solar energy, due to the consistently warm
climate throughout the
year.
During the so - called Holocene
Climate Optimum, from approximately 8000 to 5000
years ago, when the temperatures were somewhat warmer than today, there was significantly less sea ice in the Arctic Ocean, probably less than 50 % of the summer 2007 coverage, which is absolutely lowest on record.
Second, the warming following the end of the last glaciation peaked 8000 to 6000
years ago at what is known as the Holocene
Climate Maximum (or
Optimum in some sources).
[Response: The period 8K
years ago (sometimes referred to in a value - laden way as the «climatic
optimum») is not a good analogy for what goes on in a doubled CO2
climate.
spalding craft (2)-- Actually, there is an overwhelming abundance of evidence that the
climate warmed to a maximum, so - called
optimum, temperature at different times in different regions, but about 8 — 6 thousand
years ago; it had been cooling, on average since until humans started added considerable quantities of global warming (so - called greenhouse) gases started in, say, 1850 CE.
And the Holocene
Climate Optimum, which prevailed from 10,000 to 6000
years ago, was warmer than the present for four millennia (subject to a brief dip in the middle).
And a really big warming period: «The Holocene
Climate Optimum (HCO) was a warm period during roughly the interval 9,000 to 5,000
years B.P..
And a world
climate that compared to the [British and North Sea]
climate of 800 and 900
years ago was like, we really do live in a time of an extraordinarly placid climatic
optimum.
From the Younger Dryas to the
Optimum just eight thousand
years back... now that really was
climate change.
I am pretty sure that the MWP was at least as warm and maybe even warmer than today, as good as the Roman WP was warmer and the Holocene
Climate optimum of 6,000
years ago was warmer... The MWP had a CO2 level about 6 ppmv higher than the LIA, that is all you can expect as increase in the atmosphere from the current warm period.
We know the effects of a warmer
climate: during the past 10,000 years, human civilizations have prospered during the warmer Holocene Climate Optimum (7,000 to 3,000 BC) and the Medieval Warm Period (800 to 13
climate: during the past 10,000
years, human civilizations have prospered during the warmer Holocene
Climate Optimum (7,000 to 3,000 BC) and the Medieval Warm Period (800 to 13
Climate Optimum (7,000 to 3,000 BC) and the Medieval Warm Period (800 to 1350 AD).
Current GCM models may have realistic - seeming weather patterns, but are totally incapable of producing phenomena that look like the Holocene (Little Ice Age, Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Holocene
Optimum, the steady decline of temperature on average over the last 3,000
years, etc.) The
Climate Science community has, instead, taken the path of trying to claim that these swings didn't occur (Michael Mann's «Hockey Stick», etc.) This does not give me a lot of confidence in the rest of their «science».
Looking at the first number — 408 parts per million CO2 — we find that the last time global levels of this potent heat - trapping gas were so high was during the Middle Miocene
Climate Optimum of 15 - 17 million
years ago.
The Northern Hemisphere was substantially warmer than the present for thousands of
years during the Holocene
Climate Optimum (~ 5,000 - 9,000
years ago).
It has been warmer than the present for much of the ten thousand
years since the last big ice age: it was a little warmer for a few centuries in the medieval warm period around 1100 (when Greenland was settled for grazing) and also during the Roman -
Climate Optimum at the time of the Roman Empire (when grapes grew in Scotland), and at least 1 °C warmer for much of the Holocene
Climate Optimum (four to eight thousand
years ago).
In a globe that is for the most part too cold to support photosynthesis at
optimum levels, except for fractional parts of the
year you (i.e.
climate scientists) should begin by asking which parts are too warm and which parts too cool and focus on the bits that you consider too warm.
In a recent review of Holocene
climate variability (Part A, and Part B) it was shown that Milankovitch forcing was likely the primary driving force behind the general
climate evolution from the Holocene Climatic
Optimum to the Neoglacial period, for the past 12,000
years.
-- Romanian Warm Period about 2000
years ago — Medieval Warm Period with a
climate optimums about 1000
years ago — Little Ice Age from 15th to mid-19th century.
The 300
years of Viking settlements in Greenland during the Medieval Warm Period and viniculture in Britain suggested a warmer world in earlier times than at present while the colder Dark Ages separate the MWP from the Roman
Climate optimum.
We do not know enough to determine under what circumstance CO2 is a forcing or a feedback relative to temperature sometimes it maybe both sometimes over large areas it may even be a coolant e.g. if you think it is the main driver (which I don't) you would have to say it acted as a coolant for several thousand
years from the Holocene
climate optimum to the LIA — see Fig 6 in the last post at http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com I quoted the end Permian Siberian traps as a possible example of CO2 as a forcing but even here CO2 was rising rapidly before the volcanic event.
Also, RGB at Duke would scold R.Gates for making the «schtick» «First, the
climate now is not warmer than it was in the Holocene
Optimum (do not make the mistake of conflating the high frequency, high resolution «2004 ″ data point with the smoothed low frequency, low resolution data in the curve — even the figure's caption warns against doing that — for the very good reason that in every 300
year smoothed upswing it is statistically certain that the upswing involved multidecadal intervals of temperatures much higher than the running mean.
Case in point: «Perhaps Ray would like to explain why he considers «now» (or whenever in the last 250
years) to be the ideal or
optimum climate for the entire planet?»
Look for the articles on the MWP, Holocene climatic
optimum, Greenland, glacial cycles, solar influences, «100
years is not enough» and «
climate is always changing».