Not exact matches
Denominations encourage this illusion in their continuing efforts to produce and market a new
curriculum every three to four
years — sometimes
without even evaluating the effect of the old
curriculum on learners.
Slattery agreed that while «they [public schools] haven't had overtly bad sex education, its covertly and
without former
curriculum: tie - ins and programs to escort school children to planned parenthood, it's been happening for 40
years.»
A
year ago (see Chapter 3), I started taking my cumulative / qualifying / comprehensive exams: six fabulous questions on any topic within (or
without) the
curriculum.
Teachers often feel that the expertise they have gained from their experience is ignored and that they instead get a new, supposedly evidence - based
curriculum every few
years without much explanation of why the new one is so much better than the old.
I believe that after this
year, I will be able to reflect on and fine tune my new assessments
without having to redesign entire
curriculum units.
Such a vision for academic excellence through digital learning is one that will allow
curriculum teams to meet the challenges of today and the next few
years without walking backwards into the future.
But after 140
years of American public education operating
without standardized
curricula and standards, this is clearly not so.
In the last generation, there has been no three -
year period
without reform of
curriculum, testing, exams or school funding.
In this report, the authors, members of the Teachers Learning Collaborative, present the results of a three -
year collaborative effort to create an innovative literacy
curriculum framework that would support teachers» dual — and often competing — commitments in literacy instruction: (a) to make sure that all students have the opportunity to learn literacy skills and strategies with texts that are at their instructional level, and (b) to make sure that all students have access to, and instruction with, texts that are appropriate to their age level, even if the students are unable to read such materials
without support.
In Williams v. California, for example, teachers, parents, and students from low - income communities described overcrowded schools that had to run multiple shifts each day and multiple shifts during the school
year, alternating on - months and off - months for different cohorts of students cycling in and out of the building; classrooms with more than 40 students
without enough desks, chairs, and textbooks for each student to have one; lack of
curriculum materials, science equipment, computers, and libraries; and crumbling facilities featuring leaky ceilings and falling ceiling tiles, sometimes overrun with rodents, and lacking heat and air conditioning.
SELECTED ACHIEVEMENTS • Contributed highly to the implementation of a particularly challenging
curriculum in the absence of a paraprofessional • Managed a class of 15 seven
year old students for 3 days
without the leadership of the class teacher,
without incident • Saved a 5
year old from choking on a piece of food by employing fast and accurate first aide knowledge • Introduced the concept of «online materials resourcing», reducing the cost of ordering the same by 50 %