Sentences with phrase «year dummy»

In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward - facing restraint, was not excessive.

Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the 5 series was awarded maximum points for protection of the 3 year dummy in the frontal and side impacts.

In the frontal offset test, protection of the 10 year dummy was good for all parts of the body, and maximum points were scored.

Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward - facing restraint, was not excessive and, other than marginally high neck tension, protection of that dummy was also good.

Chest decelerations in the 6 year dummy indicated marginal performance but protection was otherwise good or adequate.

In the frontal offset test, readings of neck tension in the 10 year dummy, and of chest deceleration in the 6 year dummy indicated a marginal level of protection.

In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, as was that of the chest of the 6 year dummy.

In the frontal offset test, dummy readings from the 6 year dummy indicated marginal protection of the chest and poor protection of the neck.

In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward - facing restraint, was not excessive.

In the frontal offset test, protection of the 10 year dummy was rated as at least adequate.

In the side impact crash, the head of the 10 - year dummy contacted the interior trim bottoming out the curtain airbag.

In the frontal offset test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward - facing restraint, was not excessive, although chest and neck decelerations were marginally elevated.

In the frontal offset test, dummy readings indicated good protection for all critical body areas of the 10 year dummy.

Owing to limited rear space the results of the dynamic tests on the 10 year dummy were done in a separate test.

The CX - 3 scored maximum points for its protection of the 1 1/2 year dummy in the dynamic impact tests.

Protection of the 3 year dummy was also good apart from marginally high tensile forces in the neck.

In the frontal offset test, readings of tension in the neck of the 10 year dummy indicated poor protection for this body area.

In the offset frontal impact, protection of the 10 year dummy's chest and neck was adequate and that of the head was good.

In the dynamic tests, the Vitara scored maximum points for its protection of the 1 year dummy.

Protection of the 6 year dummy, sat in a high - back booster, was rated as good and adequate for the head and neck respectively but dummy readings of chest deceleration indicated marginal chest protection.

The Avensis scored maximum points for its protection of the 1 1/2 year dummy in the dynamic impact tests.

In the side barrier test, dummy readings indicated good protection, apart from the head of the 10 year dummy.

Consequently, all points were lost for the 10 year dummy in this test.

The Galaxy scored maximum points for its protection of the 1 1/2 year dummy in the dynamic impact tests.

Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward - facing restraint, was not excessive in the frontal impact, although neck tensile forces were marginally high.

In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward - facing restraint, was not excessive and, in the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior.

Similarly, decelerations in the chest of the 6 year dummy indicated poor protection of this body region.

Similarly, protection of the neck was rated as poor for the 10 year dummy, as a result of high tensile forces during the test.

Protection of the chest of the 6 year dummy was weak, based on decelerations measured by the dummy.

In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward - facing restraint, was not excessive although the neck recorded marginally elevated tensile forces.

For the 6 year dummy, protection of the chest was rated as marginal and that of other critical body areas was good.

In the frontal offset test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy was not excessive and, apart from marginally elevated neck tension, forces on the dummy were well controlled.

The Caddy scored maximum points for its protection of the 1 1/2 year dummy in the dynamic impact tests.

In the frontal offset test, protection of the chest of the 6 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest decelerations.

In the frontal offset test, dummy readings in the 6 year dummy indicated marginal chest protection but, otherwise, protection was good or adequate for both dummies.

In the frontal offset test, protection of both dummies was good or adequate except for the neck of the 10 year dummy, for which readings of tensile forces indicated weak protection.

In the frontal offset test, measurements of tensile forces in the neck of the 10 year dummy indicated poor protection for that part of the body.

In the frontal offset test, neck protection was rated as poor for the 10 - year dummy, based on recorded values of tensile forces.

Protection of both child dummies was good apart from the neck, rated as adequate for the 6 year dummy and marginal for the 10 year dummy.

The 2 Series Active Tourer scored maximum points in the dynamic tests for its protection of both the 1 1/2 year and the 3 year dummy.

In the frontal impact, forward movement of the three year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive.

Similarly, neck tensile forces in the 10 year dummy indicated weak protection of this part of the body.

Neck tension in the 6 year dummy indicated poor protection for this body region.

In the frontal offset test, chest decelerations of the 6 year dummy's chest showed poor protection, exceeding recommended safe limits.

However, readings from the 6 year dummy indicated weak protection of the chest and marginal protection of the neck.

The 500X scored maximum points for its protection of the 1 1/2 year dummy in the dynamic tests and lost only a fraction of a point for the 3 year dummy, for chest acceleration slightly over the good performance limit.

The car scored maximum points for its protection of the 1 1/2 year dummy in the dynamic impact tests.

Similiarly, neck tensile forces in the 10 year dummy indicated weak protection of this part of the body.

Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward - facing restraint, was not excessive but dummy readings indicated high values of neck tension and marginally high readings for chest deceleration.

In the frontal offset test, protection of the 10 year dummy was good.