Sentences with phrase «year evaluation period»

The following chart shows the static composition of the reference ETF portfolio over the ten - year evaluation period (it should be noted that the reference portfolio somewhat differs between the two analysis periods):
The growth outperformance becomes even more pronounced when the beginning of the analysis is moved to April 2005 for a 10 - year evaluation period:
Although the evaluation found no impact on student math performance, the estimated reading impact of using a scholarship to attend a private school for any length of time during the three - year evaluation period was a statistically significant gain of more than 5 scale points.
The estimated impact of using a scholarship to attend a private school for any length of time during the three - year evaluation period was a gain of 5.3 scale points in reading.
I vowed to myself that I would give this profession a 1 - year evaluation period.
In sum, the Jensen Quality Growth Fund did not substantially outperform its respective reference ETF portfolios over the standard ten -, five - and three - year evaluation periods.

Not exact matches

This must - attend national event in Houston, has been a recruiting calendar staple for years, and takes place during the NCAA evaluation period for both men's and women's D1 coaches.
I / we agree that if any material change (s) occur (s) in my / our financial condition that I / we will immediately notify BSHFC of said change (s) and unless Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation is so notified it may continue to rely upon the application and financial statement and the representations made herein as a true and accurate statement of my / our financial condition.nI / we authorize Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation to make whatever credit inquiries / background checks it deems necessary in connection with this application and financial statement.nI / we authorize and instruct any person or consumer reporting agency to furnish to BSHFC any information that it may have to obtain in response to such credit inquiries.nIn consideration of the ongoing association between Baby Safe Homes and the undersigned applicant (hereinafter u201cApplicantu201d), the parties hereto have entered into this Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition Agreement.nWHEREAS, in the course of its business operations, Baby Safe Homes provides its customers products and services which, by nature of the business, include trade secrets, confidential and proprietary information, and other matters deemed material or important enough to warrant protection; and WHEREAS, Applicant, by reason of his / her interest in Baby Safe Homes and in the course of his / her duties, has access to said secrets and confidential information; and WHEREAS, Baby Safe Homes has trade secrets and other confidential and proprietary information, including procedures, customer lists, and particular desires or needs of such customers to which Applicant has access in the course of his / her duties as an Applicant.nNow, therefore, in consideration of the premises contained herein, the parties agree as follows Applicant shall not, either during the time of his / her franchise evaluation with Baby Safe Homes or at any time thereafter either directly or indirectly, communicate, disclose, reveal, or otherwise use for his / her own benefit or the benefit of any other person or entity, any trade secrets or other confidential or proprietary information obtained by Employee by virtue of his / her employment with Baby Safe Homes, in any manner whatsoever, any such information of any kind, nature, or description concerning any matters affecting or relating to the Baby Safe Homes business, or in the business of any of its customers or prospective customers, except as required in the course of his / her employment by Baby Safe Homes or except as expressly authorized Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation, in writing.nDuring any period of evaluation with Baby Safe Homes, and for two (2) years thereafter, Applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, induce or influence, divert or take away, or attempt to divert or take away and, during the stated period following termination of employment, call upon or solicit, or attempt to call upon or solicit, any of the customers or patrons Baby Safe Homes including, but not limited to, those upon whom he / she was directly involved, or called upon, or catered to, or with whom became acquainted while engaged in the franchise evaluation process of a Baby Safe Homes franchise business.
A student who transfers from the Florida Virtual School full - time program to a traditional public school before or during the first grading period of the school year is academically eligible to participate in interscholastic extracurricular activities during the first grading period if the student has a successful evaluation from the previous school year pursuant to paragraph (a).
A student who transfers from a charter school program to a traditional public school before or during the first grading period of the school year is academically eligible to participate in interscholastic extracurricular activities during the first grading period if the student has a successful evaluation from the previous school year, pursuant to subparagraph 2.
Urinary incontinence (UI) has an effect on quality of life during the postpartum period.1, 2 Fear of UI is one of the most common reasons for maternal demand for cesarean delivery.3, 4 The muscle strength of the pelvic floor returns to the antepartum value 6 — 10 weeks postpartum in most women.5, 6 However, UI symptoms after delivery do not resolve in the long term in some women.7, 8 Studies have variously concluded that the prevalence of UI changed9 or did not change within 6 months or 1 year postpartum.10, 11 A higher prevalence or incidence of UI has been observed in women who had a vaginal delivery than in women who underwent cesarean delivery.10 — 18 In contrast, a recent study found that vaginal delivery was not associated with postpartum UI.19 The long - term protective effect of cesarean delivery has not been determined.20 Validated and reliable questionnaires to evaluate UI, including severity and quality of life, are needed for postpartum evaluation.21 However, comparisons of UI severity and the effect on daily life between women who have had vaginal and cesarean deliveries are scarce.22
Extend probationary period for new teachers to five years, during which new teachers must consecutively receive evaluations at the two highest categories, effective or highly effective.
According to the administration source, instead of a three - year probationary period before teachers are offered the traditional job protections, they would need to earn three consecutive «effective» ratings under the state's performance evaluation system.
Heastie, however, said that the probationary period would be extended from three years to four years, and teachers» evaluations would be a factor in tenure decisions.
New York has a 3 - to 4 - year probationary periods for new teachers and a new evaluation system, which established an expedited process allowing schools to hold teachers accountable based on teacher evaluation results.
A spokesman said on Friday that Mr. Silver also opposed making changes to the state's teacher evaluation system that would increase the weight of state tests, and opposed increasing the probationary period for teachers to five years from three, as the chancellor of the State Board of Regents, Merryl H. Tisch, proposed in a recent letter to the governor's office.
Effectiveness evaluation began at 3.5 years and continued twice yearly during the 10 - year - period.
It may be achieved after as few as three years of classroom experience and be based on nothing more than «satisfactory» evaluations from a novice teacher's supervisor during that period.
ASAP requires students to attend college full time and during the evaluation period provided the following components for three years:
The decreases occurred even though overall appropriations for education research increased in the same period, according to Lois - ellin Datta, director of human - services program evaluation for the gao She said the situation had improved only marginally since the agency reported a signficant decline in the quality and quantity of federal education data nearly two years ago.
Beginning in the 2016 - 17 school year, Michigan's new educator evaluation law, Public Act 173 of 2015, will link teacher certificate renewal and progression to evaluation ratings for the most recent five - year period.
A coalition of groups supporting public education today launched an online petition asking the Tennessee General Assembly and Governor Bill Haslam to grant teachers a grace period from the use of student test scores in their evaluations in the first year of new TNReady tests.
Use teacher evaluations to make teacher tenure decisions, with teachers granted tenure after receiving two Highly Effective or three Effective ratings within a five - year period.
Special education records collected by Braination related to the identification, evaluation, educational placement, or the provision of special education in the district must be maintained under state and federal laws for a period of five years after special education services have ended for the student.
Teachers can earn 25 SCECHs with a maximum of 75 in a 5 - year period, by mentoring a new teacher for at least one full semester of an academic year and submitting an evaluation of the performance activities for the mentoring period to the building principal.
, each school district shall annually report to the parent of any student who is assigned to a classroom teacher or school administrator having two consecutive annual performance evaluation ratings of unsatisfactory under s. 1012.34, two annual performance evaluation ratings of unsatisfactory within a 3 - year period under s. 1012.34, or three consecutive annual performance evaluation ratings of needs improvement or a combination of needs improvement and unsatisfactory under s. 1012.34.
Just cause includes, but is not limited to, the following instances, as defined by rule of the State Board of Education: immorality, misconduct in office, incompetency, two consecutive annual performance evaluation ratings of unsatisfactory under s. 1012.34, two annual performance evaluation ratings of unsatisfactory within a 3 - year period under s. 1012.34, three consecutive annual performance evaluation ratings of needs improvement or a combination of needs improvement and unsatisfactory under s. 1012.34, gross insubordination, willful neglect of duty, or being convicted or found guilty of, or entering a plea of guilty to, regardless of adjudication of guilt, any crime involving moral turpitude.
A postponement won't throw implementation off greatly, since the first year of the three - year waiver period will largely involve planning — including the accountability criteria and the designs of teacher evaluations.
Public Act 173 of 2015, the new Michigan educator evaluation law, links teacher certificate renewal and progression to teacher evaluation data for the most recent five - year period.
The new version keeps the current system, with two years as the standard period, but would allow a third year of probation if the district develops an improvement plan to address deficiencies that a teacher's evaluation identified and then makes training and other help for teachers a budget priority.
A spokesman said on Friday that Mr. Silver also opposed making changes to the state's teacher evaluation system that would increase the weight of state tests, and opposed increasing the probationary period for teachers to five years from three, as the chancellor of the State Board of Regents, Merryl H. Tisch, proposed in a recent letter to the governor's office.
Test data should not be used in formal evaluations during a teacher's probationary period, the first two years he or she teaches.
Eight school districts and one educational service district were selected to develop and implement teacher evaluation systems over a two - year pilot period under E2SSB 6696.
If there are student growth and assessment data available for a teacher or administrator for at least three school years, the annual year - end evaluation shall be based on the student growth and assessment data for the most recent three - consecutive - school - year period.
The audit also noted that district was not using state test scores in teacher evaluations during the 11 - year period reviewed and that the district's contract with the teachers union at the time did not allow for it.
Teachers with good evaluations who are unable to find a job have a year's grace period, at full pay, to continue the search.
New teachers will be considered «probationary» until they achieve the highest evaluation ratings, «effective» or «highly effective,» for three years in a five - year period.
Over a three year period, REA staff conducted formative evaluation of onsite Design Lab exhibits, summative evaluation of Teacher Summer Institutes.
Here in Connecticut we require new teachers to have a probationary period of 4 years — enough time to conduct effective evaluations programs to determine whether each new teacher really has what it takes to be a truly effective teacher for Connecticut's public schools.
In his «historic» call for «education reform», an end to teacher tenure and a disproportionate transfer of public dollars to charter schools the Governor failed to point out that (1) Connecticut already has one of the longest probationary periods for teachers in the country — four years — which gives school administrators more opportunity to judge a teacher's capability than do those in most other states and that (2) in 2010 the Legislature adopted major revisions to the teacher evaluation process that already gives Malloy's Department of Education the power to revamp how teachers are evaluated and require school administrators to actually conduct appropriate evaluations.
The four bills would increase the probationary period — the length of time before a teacher is up for tenure — from four to five years; end the practice of laying teachers off predominately based on seniority; put teachers evaluated as ineffective back on probation; make it easier to fire teachers for a broader slew of offenses; and limit collective - bargaining rights, barring unions from negotiating areas such as teacher evaluations.
Thus, the evaluation covers a three - year period for the middle schools in the sample and a one - year period for the high schools.
For example, over a three - year period between 2006 and 2008, more than 98 percent of Denver Public Schools teachers received a «Satisfactory» rating in the district's binary evaluation system.
These schools will be subject to strict oversight and public accountability, including annual performance reviews to evaluate their success in improving student outcomes and an evaluation at the end of the five - year period to determine whether additional public charter schools should be allowed.
The General Assembly passed teacher tenure reform legislation in 2011 which changes a teacher's probationary period before becoming eligible for tenure from three to five years as well as linking tenure status to performance evaluations.
There will also be an evaluation at the end of the five - year period to determine whether additional public charter schools should be allowed.
I notice that many districts trained on the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model over a two - year period understand the parts of the Marzano Teacher Model, but they miss out on the power ofknowing the model as a -LSB-...]
Malloy failed to tell the public that Connecticut already has one of the longest teacher probation periods in the nation (4 years) and the major teacher evaluation reforms that became law in 2010 will finally require school administrators to do their job and remove teachers who are not up to the job.
But it is now nearly half a year later, our three - month evaluation period turned into four months during which time we drove nearly 8,000 miles behind the wheel of the CX - 5.
Selectable evaluation periods (lifetime, 20, 10, 5, 3, and 1 year, plus full, down, and up market cycles) for all risk and performance metrics, better enabling direct comparison.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z