The 5
year graph shows that the dividend payout has increased from $ 0.19 quarterly to $ 0.23.
Finally, I see that the eyeball line of best fit through the model outputs on the 30 -
year graph implies a trend of approximately 1.5 C degrees per century.
Looks like the
2k year graph was cherry - picked for its visual impact.
Reconstructed changes in Arctic sea ice over the past 1,450
years This graph from Cryosphere Today shows the same thing.
A year - by -
year graph of actual renewable production would be more informative in the IPCC release.
Even if the aggregate of the models falls close to the 20 - and 30 -
year graphs, the aggregate of a couple of dozen weak arguments is not a strong argument for model accuracy, just as a faggot, a bundle of sticks, is not as strong as a log of equal diameter.
None of them does a particularly good job of tracing the actual temperature changes, but in aggregate, the eyeball average of all of them appears to fall at approximately the ending temperature for the 10 -
year graph.
It falls somewhat above the ending temperature of the 20 -
year graph and it falls far above the ending temperature of the 30 - year graph.
the short - sighted 20 -
year graph is a joke.
By putting up a 100 -
year graph and then saying «climate change is a noisy, long term process», you exhibit the same kind of intellectual dishonesty Will does.