In cases where spin - offs or divestitures obscure 10
year growth rate calculations, either fewer years are used to calculate the growth rate, or an estimate of growth is used.
Not exact matches
In the base
year used in the five -
year growth calculation (e.g., 2012), any companies with revenue of less than $ 200,000 will have their revenue for that period lifted to $ 200,000 for the purpose of calculating five -
year growth that is not grossly exaggerated by immaterial differences in the base -
year revenues of otherwise equal candidates (for instance, a company that grows from $ 1 to $ 2 million would have a higher
growth rate than a company that grows from $ 2 to $ 3 million).
In the base
year used in the two -
year growth calculation (e.g., 2015), any companies with revenue of less than $ 200,000 will have their revenue for that period lifted to $ 200,000 for the purpose of calculating two -
year growth that is not grossly exaggerated by immaterial differences in the base -
year revenues of otherwise equal candidates (for instance, a company that grows from $ 1 to $ 2 million would have a higher
growth rate than a company that grows from $ 2 to $ 3 million).
On the assumption that there are no second - round effects of the GST, resulting from stronger wages
growth, the
year - ended CPI inflation
rate is thereafter expected to return to the target zone, as the GST impact drops out of the
calculation.
By my
calculations it grew 12 % month - over-month between November and December this
year, an compounded annualized
growth rate of 290 %.
The 5 -
year estimated annual total return is a
calculation based on the company achieving the estimated EPS
growth rate and then the stock trading at its earnings justified valuation.
The required / estimated
growth rates used in the Gordon Growth Model calculations are lower than the historic growth rates that Hershey has provided and lower than estimated earnings growth over the next 5
growth rates used in the Gordon
Growth Model calculations are lower than the historic growth rates that Hershey has provided and lower than estimated earnings growth over the next 5
Growth Model
calculations are lower than the historic
growth rates that Hershey has provided and lower than estimated earnings growth over the next 5
growth rates that Hershey has provided and lower than estimated earnings
growth over the next 5
growth over the next 5
years.
Well besides the obvious implications in this SLR study, I'm thinking, well there's a goose and a gander, and what's good for one is surely appropriate for others so long as the base data is scientifically valid and the methodology is the same ie using current known
growth rates plus «if this then that»
calculations years ahead.
My back of the envelope
calculations tell me that the annual compound
growth rate of (evil) carbon in the atmosphere since 1960 is approximately 0.421 % p.a. Projecting the present 390ppm @ the 0.421 % p.a historical
growth rate over the next 40
years gives us approximately 461ppm of carbon in the atmosphere by 2050.