Not exact matches
Btw the 10
year horizon is relevant to me as it is when I can take my 25 % lump sum from SIPP, so preferable taking it from bonds that have just been redeemed
rather than selling down equities that may be in a bear market at the time.
As I've emphasized in prior market comments, valuations are the primary driver of investment returns over a 10 - 12
year horizon, and of prospective losses over the completion of any market cycle, but they are
rather useless indications of near - term returns.
In a short paper presented last
year, he suggests that the event
horizon is not a defined boundary at all, but
rather a zone of chaos where space and time are completely scrambled.
While the researchers advocate using both 20 - and 100 -
year time scales (
rather than one or the other), they do not advocate for a change in time
horizons.
It's all about being safe
rather than sorry later so we aren't afraid to work a couple more
years to have cushion, especially given our hopefully long retirement time
horizon!
When we begin to assess performance over shorter
horizons, such as 3
years rather than 50, these nearly equivalent strategies from a 50 -
year perspective now appear to be extraordinarily different: their shorter - term returns deviate significantly.
A greater number of momentum funds outperform the market with a
horizon of 15
years rather than 5 or 10.
If your investment
horizon is less than one
year then, returns should not be a priority,
rather SAFETY of your capital is more important.
If you are planning to use that money in two or three
years, your investment
horizon is kind of short, so you
rather allocate more in fixed income, in case there is a dip in the stock market.
Rather aggressive but my investment
horizon is 25 - 30
years.
With another
year and another season on the
horizon, the bar is set
rather high for the video game series.
The genesis of
HORIZON came as Cory Schmitz (who is, of course, behind the fantastic
HORIZON design) & I sat at home streaming last
year's string of E3 press conferences and instantly decided to «light a candle,
rather than curse the darkness» and try to put together the E3 experience we wanted to see in the world.
And I'm kinda of the old school which,
rather unimaginatively favors strategic, long - range planning in the form of a multiplicity of potential futures — to include a world of possible, cold climate change along with a possible, warm climate change — especially when the planning
horizon is more than 80
years out.
«Our results
rather show that even a time
horizon of 100
years is short - sighted when it comes to glaciers... Our responsibility stretches a lot further into the future.»
In the UK, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has called for governments of all political persuasions to take more of a long - term approach to planning such projects, with a 25 -30-
year horizon rather than working over five -
year electoral cycles or even shorter timeframes.