Sentences with phrase «year limitation period relating»

In a case heard last month, the Pensions Ombudsman held that the date when the six - year limitation period relating to an action for the recovery of pension overpayments stopped was the date upon which the scheme administrator first notified the member of the overpayments and sought repayment.

Not exact matches

Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, joined by MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL, agreed only with that part of the plurality opinion relating to the limitation of federal interest in the facilities to 20 years, concluding that a reversion of a facility at the end of that period to a parochial school would be unconstitutional as a gift of taxpayers» funds.

The Court's ruling in Chavez v. Delgado, 2014 - NMCA - 014 (2014), is important because it determined that the three year statute of limitations period for a medical malpractice claim begins when an injured plaintiff is prescribed an allegedly harmful medication, and not when he or she suffers a related injury or dies.

Any complaints where the conduct occurred during or after 2002, and the service to which the complaint relates has not expired / been terminated more than six years ago can avail of this new limitation period.

In general, all franchise related civil claims, whether statutory or common law, are subject to a general two - year limitation period in Ontario to commence a legal action under Ontario's Limitations Act, 2002.

In general, all franchise - related civil claims, whether statutory or common law, are subject to a general two - year limitation period in Ontario to commence a legal action under Ontario's Limitations Act, 2002.

Depending on the sanctions set out in the abstract for the violation under investigation, the limitation period relating to criminal prosecution ranges from two to 15 years.

In addition, the government plans to table legislation that, if passed, would strengthen provisions related to sexual violence and harassment in the workplace, on campus and in housing, and would eliminate the two - year limitation period for civil sexual assault claims and claims of sexual assault before the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.

A general rule of thumb is to keep all receipts, statements, copies of tax returns and other related tax documents for the return year's entire «period of limitations.»