Sentences with phrase «year means nothing»

Making 30 % one year means nothing if you lose 30 % the following year.

Leaked reports that the 50p rate has raised little extra revenue in the first year mean nothing.

In essence the 70 years means nothing to our contract.

Contracts - You said «In essence the 70 years means nothing to our contract.

Deniers generally do not understand and don't want to understand that ten years means nothing to climate.

I pointed out your folly: LONG before that ends there are massive problems, so saying we have oil for another 50 or 100 years means nothing.

Not exact matches

These days, I've gotten to a weird point, where — I mean, I've been doing it for like, seven years, so I sometimes feel like I have nothing left to say.

I mean the great recession that we had here a few years ago was nothing compared to this.

By the end of this year, internal job titles will mean nothing at the billion - dollar startup.

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

The ACA move has failed (seriously — after 7 years of complaining and saying that they had a better plan, the Republicans had nothing) and that means sharks smell blood in the water and will push back on every Trump proposal.

The post is a Level III on the federal executive schedule, meaning he was making $ 172,100 a year, far less than he earned in the private sector but still nothing to scoff at.

You are gone and forgotten and mean nothing 1000 years later.

On face value, W. E. Hocking's remark that when Whitehead arrived at Harvard «his speculative structure... was already well advanced in its main outlines» is a bit of external evidence against my hypothesis, but it may mean nothing more than that Whitehead was little influenced by the philosophical opinions and controversies of his American colleagues during these years, which seems very much to have been the case.

The primary logical inconstancy that always bothers me however, is the assumption that without a higher power, meaning can somehow applied to the universe through the individual despite the fact that, according to the materialist atheist worldview, in several billion years humanity will be gone, the universe will have expanded into a cold and lifeless husk, and nothing any human being ever did, learned, discovered, or achieved will have mattered at all, so why care?

If BO wins this election it means, God has abandoned USA... say hello to dark age the next 4 years, this is just the start, you ain't see nothing yet..

I have worked with survivors for more than 30 years, and I can assure you that as well - meaning as you must want to be, your responses (including this one) does nothing to help the situation.

Do my 50 years of experience mean nothing?

Be careful that you do not entertain a mean thought, thinking, «The seventh year, the year of remission, is near,» and therefore view your needy neighbor with hostility and give nothing; your neighbor might cry to the Lord against you, and you would incur guilt.

So I picked Light all on my own and I've got to be honest with you: it has meant next to nothing to me this year.

Scholars argue every day, (and have been for thousands of years), about the meaning of that whole business, and NOTHING about it is «incontrovertible» or about ANY part of it.

By that I mean spend your first year doing nothing.

Consider this... a person goes to college, gets a four year degree in archaeology (or some antiquities preservation analog); spends summers sifting through sand and rock and gravel, all the while taking graduate level classes... person eventually obtains the vaunted PhD in archaeology... then works his / her tail off seeking funding for an archeological excavation, with the payoff being more funding, and more opportunities to dig in the dirt... do you think professional archaeologists are looking hard for evidence of the Exodus on a speculative basis... not a chance... they know their PhD buys them nothing more than a job at Tel Aviv Walmart if they don't discover and publish... so they write grants for digs near established sites / communities, and stay employed sifting rock in culturally safe areas... not unless some shepard stumbles upon a rare find in an unexpected place do you get archeological interest and action in remote places... not at all surprising that the pottery and other evidence of the Exodus and other biblical events lie waiting to be discovered... doesn't mean not there... just not found yet...

The Western mind has some trouble seeing the essence of anything being independent of the sum of its properties (especially for the atheistic belief system, which regards nothing, people included, as having inherent meaning), but consider a pale analogy: Say that you bought your wife a locket for her birthday one year.

The fact that a couple thousand years or so ago some people decided to actually write down what they held as their own moral standard means nothing today.

Earning back public trust will mean reining in some of the rhetorical (to say nothing of policy) excesses of the Bush years.

This recipe is meant for Halloween, but there's nothing stopping you from enjoying it year round!

If this article was meant to cheer me up, well it didn't MANURE, SHITTY, CHELSHIT they have all won the EPL in recent years, if their teams are not top notch at certain time at least they try to build it again to win, our case is different we have this dinosaur leaving in past glories, the man became a stingy little tyrant and his personal satisfaction seems to be shove it to the fans that btw pay his outrageous salary year after year with nothing to show for, look at the pic yes we qualify to CL so what, we are the 5th biggest team in the world, we are not SOTON, SPUDS or HULL but we are as far as these teams to win a real trophy, it will not happen while Le Frog is still in charge, what a way to stain a legacy, he should have retired honorably while fans like me still had admiration for the man...... WENGER go to.......................

What Wenger did back then made him an eternal club legend, but his achievements from 10 + years ago mean nothing for him today.

Admin DO NO ALLOW BOB OR SOME OTHER FOOL TO WRITE AN ARTICLE MAKING EXCUSES This is what we deserve No signings mean no progress, we've been in the CL 18 years and we / he has learnt nothing 61 % possession but we do not have a plan, it's like keep ball without a purpose I said it before and I will again, his time is up, and you can thumb me down as much as you want, if we end up in the shitty Europa cup it will affect our league position, AKB stop thinking we are quality, and who's laughing at CIty and UTD now

He's stripped back his social accounts for this year, but that doesn't mean that nothing's going to happen.

Bottom of World football of «Nous» is definitely the England football team, they're clueless, scream at players after they've fouled them, «GET UP» so they get double punishment, shout at referees, «YOU»RE A CHEAT» so they get no favours, they just haven't got a clue, they don't even know the meaning of «Nous», probably the reason we've won nothing for fifty years.

The last 15 months mean nothing in this scenario, and 28 - year - olds don't just shrivel up and lose every last scrap of talent.

That's what six years of monoverbal communication does: because Hodor used «Hodor» to mean everything, it ultimately meant nothing.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

S&P + for five of six years between 2009 - 14, they had plummeted in 2015, and while there was nothing to love about the Hoke hire, that drastic a single - year change is typically followed by a return to the mean.

Arsene Wenger has insisted that Alexis Sanchez is staying this summer, claiming his one year remaining on his contract means nothing as per his future, but reports claim he is jetting into Paris as we speak...

That means all these years, Wenger was given a task of winning the BPL with virtually nothing to buy quality players with... he had to create them himself.

Wake up and smell the f ****** coffee... Any team with mert flamini Ramsey Gibbs Monreal arteta giroud podolski will never and I mean in a million years never going to be top notch throw the delusional one in to manage and it's another ten years of nothing... If he was a decent human being he would resign tomorrow sadly he is just a third rate cheese eating surrender monkey who believes there is no alternative... A once serious club run by a corporate clique and this idiot... Lowest point in thirty year history of following arsenal

If Granit Xhaka, Mesut Özil or Lukas Podolski are in the team of the year then it means nothing.

The 24 - year - old will see his contract expire this summer, which in turn means that he become a free agent and can leave the Reds for nothing.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

I hope we keep wenger give the man a long term contract you must want some unloyal cheapskate whos been fired at 5 clubs and successful at 1 or 2 for a few years when the club spent big cause they got a new manager and after a couple years got fired beacause those spendy players got old and that manager did nothing we have the most loyal consistent winning manager in europe and if the linesman did nt make incorrect call we woould of been 1 - 0 up and mkhitaryan played poor balls in the rain which we always play bad in amd are you suffering short term memory loss we beat tottenham 2 - 0 at home so we still won the derby on aggregate this season again thanks to mr.wenger i mean where to people come out woth these low iq thoughts and mostly you have to fire three new managers before you get a couple good seasons then start the circus again people should be embarrassed wenger to stay

Besides, fans are protesting for years now and nothing happened because we know Kroenke is backing Wenger and Gazidis is a pu $ $ y. Best thing to do is simply not to come to the games in large number (that will mean that whoever is having a season ticket will not try to monetize on it by selling it on ticket exchange) and stop entering the Armory or online shops.

Iwobi has a few years on him, but that means nothing if you aren't giving it your all.

Whether he wants or not now, Arsenal must keep him for 1 year at leat even if it means he goes for nothing.

Chelsea came in early and signed Kante, while rumours about Mahrez and Vardy leaving finally ended with them signing new deals (but, as a West Ham fan, I know contracts mean nothing nowadays — see Dimitri Payet signing a new five - year deal just six months before going on strike and leaving the club).

History means nothing at all this year and we WILL win the Premiership, so stop spouting history and GET BEHIND THE TEAM!

Ah there is nothing in those rumours... if Bellerin is already tied down to a 5 year contract it means the club is in full control of what happens.

I started supporting arsenal when i knew nothing about them, i was captivated by the name «Arsenal» knowing what it means and i was introduce to arsenal by a friend who used to listen to BBC sports post-match highlight on radio because we did nt have the opportunity to watch it way back then like we used to now.At first, i supported arsenal because of their «good football or betterstill beautiful football» not «winning football» but my quest for success was increasing each year because i hardly have a say when i'm in the midst of other football fans and i'm extremely hated for backing Arsene wenger and Arsenal knowing that «you don't wash your dirty linen outside».