Sentences with phrase «year old evidence»
He's using some 40 year old evidence (if it can be called that) to attempt to prove his point.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
While Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the Nice attack, no firm evidence has yet emerged that the 31 - year - old attacker, a delivery van driver with a record of home violence and petty crimes, had direct contact with the group.
San Bruno police identified the shooter at YouTube's HQ as Nasim Aghdam, a 39 - year - old woman from San Diego, and said there is no evidence she knew the victims or that they were specifically targeted.
In this real life deus ex machina, the unexpected, if not entirely unforeseeable evidence that led directly to the arrest of the 72 - year - old Vietnam veteran came by way of a relative's DNA submitted to a genealogy website.
«Happy Birthday,» which reportedly generates $ 2 million per year for the Warner / Chappell Music, was interjected into public domain in the 20s, according to new evidence filed in a two - year - old suit.
Police have arrested a 23 - year - old man in connection with the attack and ISIS has claimed responsibility but produced no evidence.
The adjustments may also be evidence of a generational transition underway at the 113 - year - old company.
Not only does the brand owner have to dredge up information that is years old, but depending on the nature and origin of the evidence, it might also need to be notarized.
The 33 - year - old billionaire instead insists that the real mistakes that were made by Cambridge Analytica happened years ago and that Facebook's 2014 policy change served as evidence that the social network had already taken steps to ensure that app developers didn't harvest and exploit too much user data.
A video of a 70 - year - old woman testing out the autopilot system of a Tesla Model S is evidence that the technology is not for everyone just yet.
Before this weekend, the evidence that 64 - year - old Xi might stay in power longer than the norm included the newest additions to his string of titles and descriptions, such as «leadership core» in 2016.
It is unclear where Kenney found evidence that five year olds have been organizing GSAs, which seems like a fairly silly and weird claim.
Silicon Valley's obsession with cryptocurrencies requires no more evidence than the incredible rise of bitcoin, the alternative currency that crossed $ 10,000 in value on Tuesday in what is a watershed moment for the nine - year - old cash substitute.
The evidence is every ancient fossil they uncover which carbon dating will tell is millions of years old instantly proofing creationism false.
He's just refuting the ridiculous assertions by some creationists to refute clear evidence of evolutionary theory, or suggest that the Earth is only 6,000 years old.
However, this does not imply some of the more ridiculous tenets of creationism (such as man walking with dinosaurs or the world being 6000 years old) should be objectively viewed as truth when all evidence points to evolution as fact.
Quotations from a 2000 year old book of sadistic fairy tales do not count as evidence of anything.
The evidence is there that the world is much older than 6000 years, so I can not support that line of belief.
If the Universe is only 6,000 years old, why is there so much evidence indicating otherwise?
Where those who push «intelligent design» go wrong is they distort or deny real physical evidence to promote the notion that the earth is only 5000 years old and the world we see is as it was initially created.
I happen to care that what I believe can be substantiated with verifiable evidence, you on the other hand accept things based off of a 2000 + year old book that can be and has been debunked numerous times over.
Now Tohper will claim that there is lots of evidence that Earth is only 6,000 years old.
I brought up evolution because it's one of many pieces of evidence that makes it clear the earth is much older than thousands of years.
The evidence very clearly shows that the earth is billions of years old.
«Now (Topher) will claim that there is lots of evidence that Earth is only 6,000 years old.
«We realize that a thinking person would not consider a 2000 year old book of fiction to be «evidence» of anything... but we need it to prove our point so we're going to use it anyway.»
He was supposedly 500,000 years old, but all evidence of him has disappeared... What about Neanderthal Man?
The evidence we have that the earth is millions of years old is way closer to what anyone could consider «proof» than evidence to suggest Jesus existed.
There is no evidence whatsoever to suggest the earth is only thousands of years old.
And by the way, for the intelligent design crowd, how, exactly, do you DARE to disbelieve tbe evidence that was «obviously» «crafted» with such care to make the universe look like it's 13 billion years old?
Jumping up and down, like a 3 year old having a tantrum, screaming... «Evolution is real... Evolution is real»... is not enough evidence for me.
I will instead say, there is overwhelming evidence that the (earth) is millions of years old and the extreme majority of experts on the subject believe the earth is millions of years old.»
ALl of you make these claims, and the only «evidence» you ever produce is a 2000 year old book filled with 3000 year old stories.
«you can't have any of our palm fronds, so there» more evidence that world leaders are essentially temper - tantrum prone 6 year olds.
San Angelo, Texas (CNN)- Texas prosecutors rested their case Wednesday in the sexual assault trial of polygamous sect leader Warren Jeffs after playing a key piece of evidence for jurors: an audiotape they allege documents his sexual assault of a 12 - year - old girl.
Depending on how old you are, in 20 - 50 years you'll have more empirical evidence than you can possibly handle.
I'm guessing you are not so stupid as to ignore all the fossil evidence, carbon dating, and light source definition from other planets and still believe that the earth is not millions of years old.
Sorry, but any idiot that believes the earth is only 6000 years old despite the overwhelming evidence is not a true scientist.
No evidence at all (including a 4 year old seeing Jesus on a rainbow colored pony)
The formation of any major mountain range — the Himalayas, the Alps, the Andes, the Rockies, with sedimentary fossils at high alt!tude should be abundant evidence that the earth is much much older than 10,000 years.
One of those who has given evidence told me the story of a Christian family: a mother and 12 year - old daughter which were raped by ISIS militants, leading the father, who was forced to watch, to commit suicide.
Some evidence: «The oldest rocks on Earth, found in western Greenland, have been dated by four independent radiometric dating methods at 3.7 - 3.8 billion years.»
You want scientific evidence that the Earth is not 6,000 or even 10,000 years old?
You're simply crazy if you think your 2000 year old book of fairy tales holds more evidence than the scientific research done on this subject, research that is within this decade.
Yeah but they want to teach the controversy... you know, how the earth might be only 10,000 years old (no it isn't) and that humans and dinosaurs roamed the earth together (no they didn't) and that evolution has no evidence (yes it does) or that there was a global flood (no there wasn't) or that the earth might be flat or the center of the universe or a million other wrong headed theories that fly in the face of the evidence.
Newly unearthed 25 - year - old memos between Archbishop Roger M. Mahony and Msgr. Thomas J. Curry — the archdiocese's chief advisor on sex abuse cases — are the strongest evidence yet that the nation's largest Catholic...
How sad that you deny real evidence for a 2000 year old book that has never been updated and can be proven to be false on numerous things... a book written by primitive man to fool the gullible out of money and make them live in fear.
NO WAIT, there is fossil evidence that we are much much older and the earth is billions of years old
You are using some 2000 year old bronze age text as your evidence about the supernatural?
And no, a narrative in a 1500 - year old collection of short stories is not considered scientific evidence or proof of anything, no matter how many people believe it.