Sentences with phrase «year people opposed»

Not exact matches

He says he recently attended one of the largest industry trade shows, Mipcom, and ended up talking to the same people he'd last encountered six years ago, most of whom were still thinking in terms of selling programs region by region to established channels as opposed to «worldwide deals for rights to be exploited via the Internet anywhere.»
The feedback loop of the city making itself attractive to start - ups and start - ups helping to make the city attractive to talented young people (who in turn create more businesses that attract more young people) is only getting started, but Robinson says he can already see the effects both in terms of the area's legitimacy — «people are saying, «hey, I would actually invest here or I would start my business here» as opposed to 10 years ago where people would avoid the city at all costs» — and quality of life for young people.
Some people will oppose the new taxes, but congestion is taxing people in the region by $ 6 billion a year, Murray said.
Launched in August after a year - long clinical study, MoodHacker is essentially a Fitbit for the neck up, tracking a person's emotional mood as opposed to their physical fitness (though that is part of it).
Like all development over the past 25 years of Broome's development that has been vocally and vigourously opposed by passionate people it is all about management and balance.
When people can be promoted at any time, it keeps them motivated and adds incentive for them to do their best year - round, as opposed to burning the midnight oil the month before their performance evaluation.
For many organizations, it has tended to be a function into which people rotate from other parts of the business for a couple of years, as opposed to being somewhere an individual builds a career.
Boehner's move marks a fundamental shift for a man who said nine years ago he was «unalterably opposed» to legalization, and indicates that pot is increasingly supported by the American establishment even if the Attorney General still believes «good people don't smoke marijuana.»
To get a clearer picture of that, just look to how immodestly people dress and act as opposed to 200 years ago.
I also did not say that America was Isolationist — there was a large isolationist element in society (and the Christians were in that camp) that effectively kept America out of the war for years, but Roosevelt, an internationalist, was able to provide supplies via lend - lease (which the conservatives and religious people of the time opposed).
This is the reality faced by millions of women who consider abortions each year, and the sad irony is the same pro-life politicians who want to force them to have their babies typically oppose raising the minimum wage, ensuring paid sick leave and parental leave for all American workers, and protecting the 20 million people who can finally afford health insurance thanks to the Affordable Care Act.
everything in the universe evolves, not only life forms but also memes, Religion is a meme so it also change in conformity to its era or time of its conception as faith.Because in pre scientific times thousands of years ago, the scientific method of approach or philosophy has not existed yet, myth or merely story telling is considered facts, The first religion called animism more than 10,000 years ago believed that spirits or god exists in trees, rivers, mountains, boulders or in any places people at that time considered holy.hundreds of them, then when the Greeks and Romans came, it was reduced to 12, they called it polytheism, when the Jews arrived, it was further reduced to 1, monotheism.its derivatives, Christianity And Islam and later hundreds of denominations that includes Mormonism and Protestants flourished up to today.So in short this religions evolved in accordance to the scientific knowledge of the age or era they existed.If you graph the growth of knowledge, it shows a sharp increase in the last 500 years, forcing the dominant religions at that time to reinterprete their dogmas, today this traditional religions are becoming obsolete and has to evolve to survive.But first they have to unify against atheism.in the dialectical process of change, Theism in one hand and the opposing force atheism in the other, will resolve into a result or synthesis.The process shall be highlighted in the internet in the near future.
If you were active in opposing things like gay rights people a hundred years from now will remember you at least as well as we remember slave owners these days.
I confess that I draw encouragement from the way in which, in the last seventeen years, a democratic people, opposing almost every establishment of the society, has refused to acquiesce in the lethal illogic of Roe v. Wade.
Maybe if people learned to reside in the 21st century and by the evidence that we have now opposed to information from a 2000 year old book, this world would be a better place.
I often think about the Holocaust and wonder how the Christians of those years did so little to oppose the Nazis, or rescue the Jews and people groups who were annihilated.
Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a point of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A) in a position of influence and B) spending money to fight the opposing view... and it's to stop two people who love each other from wedding in the eyes of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last point about slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who supported, or fought against slavery... many justified slavery because of their perverted interpretation of the bible... most people can't tell a simple story from one person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s of years... yup you must be right that God is against two people loving each other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?
Where do you get that crystal ball of yours that tells you that in 50 years there will be just as many people opposed to gay marriage as there are now?
20 years down the line we will be sending people off for been within 5 yards of an opposing player.
I have always had strong views (I have been vegan through many years and other people / advertisements never seemed to deter it), yet when I was a new mother, completely opposed to formula... something happened.
When the Park District held a forum last year on the originally proposed site, only one person showed up to oppose the idea.
By contrast, and when analysed by attendance, «frequent - attenders» (many of whom will, of course, be Anglicans) have been consistently and significantly more opposed to the death penalty over the last ten years than people who never attend a religious service.
What ideas would make sense to create an economy for those people in order for them to have a chance to become independent of wellfare after a reasonable amount of time (some years as opposed to generations) given that they have little skills at all, at least not the kind that the majority is willing to pay
East Hampton Town Supervisor Larry Cantwell said yesterday that the town is seeing «many more people paying their full taxes for next year, as opposed to their partial payment.»
There is overwhelming support (86 per cent) for higher taxes on people earning more than # 250,000 a year, with only 14 per cent opposed.
Paul Tokasz of Cheektowaga, Silver's second - in - command for five years as majority leader of the Assembly, called the verdict «sad on many levels, understandable on other levels,» adding: «Unfortunately, he will be remembered for this as opposed to all the good the delegation and he did for Western New York... this was not the person I knew.»
Groups opposed to the mayor's plan have called for the proposal to have an option for people making 30 percent of AMI or about $ 23,000 per year for a family of three.
Research last year by YouGov found that 51 % of people supported the ban, while 33 % opposed it.
«They are the people who idolise Hugo Chavez and toast the revolution in taxpayer funded vintage burgundy and I know them because we have fought and beaten them twice and the reason I first wanted to get into that fight eight years ago is that I am fundamentally opposed to that style of politics.»
The New Patriotic Party is claiming some journalists have been paid whopping sums of money by the John Mahama administration to keep their focus on the internal happenings of the NPP, as opposed to bad governance the people have been subjected to under the seven - year rule of the NDC government.
Although attempts to knock people off the ballot are not unusual, this year's challenges have been particularly aggressive, with those opposing candidates aligned with the board's current majority showing up at homes and calling voters who signed petitions to verify their authenticity.
One could effectively fill a calendar with the 389 resolutions honoring different times of the year: Despite the immense amount of time dedicated to measures like these, few members are completely opposed to spending some time honoring people.
But if he did pretend it fooled enough of the electorate who thought he was too left wing, so they voted Tory, I can't believe that the electorate looked at Ed, said, Ah, he's only pretending to have spent the last 5 years denouncing New labour, let the 2 people who got him in place, Mkclusky and Paul Kenny, get Blaitites Liam Byrne, Frank fileld sacked, then say as opposed to new labour he had a social conscience, yet when it comes to it, he's really new labour as he's not left wing enough, I'll vote for a party who are right wing, they'd have all voted greens if they wanted it
landless Peaant who's «we» who you want to stop these evil people, do you mean the labour party, you haven't voted labour in 32 years, and you assume that the labour party wants your vote, by the way you come out with criticisms of the DWP based on the assumption that it makes you right to oppose something
Wolpoffand others take the opposing view that humanity emerged as much as 2million years ago in many places as people colonized the world andgradually evolved to their modern state.
When American Vogue's legendary stylist Grace Coddington mentioned during the documentary «The September Issue» a couple years back, on people's obsession of sharp imagery, oppose to admiring something that might be slightly blurred, this is what I can comment on of the crop movement.
When you are over 40, you need to take people as they are, because they'll rarely change as opposed to their younger years.
«Surely this question was settled eight years ago in a decision that was the seventh consecutive defeat for the disgustingly determined people who are implacably opposed to any policies that enable parents who are not affluent to exercise the right of school choice that is routinely exercised by more fortunate Americans,» writes George Will.
Moreover, if winning over skeptics is any indication of success, Hensley points with pride to a comment years later from a veteran teacher who had initially opposed his changes at Atkinson: «She said, «They sent a lot of people here to fix this school.
MAYOR: Look, I think it's understandable — and probably is more of a specific political thing than anything — I think it's understandable that people who opposed what was going on for many years in this city and this state and this country, and certainly, people who I agreed with on so many levels, including in opposition to the approaches in No Child Left Behind under George Bush, that they would want to continue to act on those concerns.
I am willing to bet that the number of people reading on their smartphones (as opposed to other devices) has increased a lot in the last couple of years.
All of a sudden, everywhere you go, all these people in the prime of their Hipness Uncertainty Syndrome years are fondling cigars, puffing earnestly away on cigars, and — worst of all — droning away endlessly about cigars, as though cigars are an intellectual topic comparable to classical literature, as opposed to transient wads of spit - drenched tobacco.
Anyway, we have a couple of thousand people, not all of whom are idiots, who believe that at all costs Amazon must be opposed and brought to heel or Traditional publishing, and possibly all the gains of the last 1000 years will be for naught, trampled underfoot, and literature will go to the dogs.
One limit though with IRAs as opposed to employer's PTSA plans, you can only put in up to $ 5,000 (or $ 6,000 if 50 years of age or older by the end of the tax year) per person into all IRAs combined while it's $ 16,500 (or $ 22,000 for those 50 or older by the end of the year) into employers retirement plans.
When exercising this discretion under the «hardship provision» a judge will consider three factors when deciding whether or not to make a «court - ordered discharge» for a person satisfying the 5 - year waiting period — as opposed to the automatic discharge a person is entitled to who satisfies the 7 - year waiting period.
Some people are adamantly opposed to cat declaws, while other cat owners insist that they have had many cats declawed over the years without problems.
Did some quick research gun violence is down in the last 20 years in the US opposed to it peaking over the last 50 years in the 80's and early 90's, I'm assuming it was due to all the Pong people were playing, and pixelated blood they were spilling xD This whole fiasco boils down to sniveling snakes called politicians who will further their agendas while not giving two shits who they step on in the process, it's the same everywhere.
I don't feel it's all that different in the end, your approach as opposed to mine that is; either you make something that enters the world in a way you feel will mature and grow over the years into something you can be proud of, or you end up with a terrific failure that sometimes (some) people still believe is fantastic.
Indeed, the person with no scientific degree that claims EM radiation can not travel in opposing directions as it would violate the 2nd law has roasted all of the worlds scientists over the last 150 years.
But it is even more upsetting for people opposed to climate mitigation, since it refutes their favourite talking point — that global warming has stalled in recent years.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z