Sentences with phrase «year probation term»

LOCKPORT — The driver who struck and killed a 16 - year - old pedestrian and left the scene in Wheatfield nearly two years ago was sentenced Monday to a five - year probation term and six months in the Niagara County Jail.

While serving his 3 - year probation term, Mr. Broomfield married a United States citizen, who is now expecting their first child.

Not exact matches

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara has recommended a «substantial» prison term beyond the eight years recommended by probation officers, according to court filings.

But the California Teachers Association, which fought the original and current version of the bill, countered that a longer probation would discourage people who are thinking about teaching, and that two years is enough time on which to judge a teacher's long - term potential.

If she violates any term of her probation, she could be sentenced to up to 3 years and 8 months in jail.

APPEAL by accused against conviction on one count of assault causing bodily harm, sentence to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and order to provide DNA sample.

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resulted.

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against sentence was allowed — Trial judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt to injure victim — Trial judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation of her conduct — Section 730 of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public interest.

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was remote.

1 Ms. M. appeals her conviction on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and her sentence whereby she received a two - year term of probation and a $ 1,000 fine.

Alternative sentencing can include terms of probation of up to 4 years, conditional discharge, periodic imprisonment, impact incarceration / boot camp, and fines.

Beyond the employment and social consequences, a person convicted of threatening death can be subject to fines, probation and liable to a term of incarceration up to five years.

Alternative sentencing for a Class 2 Felony can include terms of probation of up to 4 years, conditional discharge, periodic imprisonment for 18 to 30 months, impact incarceration / boot camp for offenders between the ages of 18 and 35, and fines.

Adjudication of guilt Deferred and Defendant placed on probation for 4 years, subject to terms and conditions of probation served on Defendant.

Boussoulas will also be subject to a two - year term of probation, after he is released from custody.

The conviction in excess of 7 years ago and my probation term (No jail time server outside of the 12 days spent awaiting a bond) ended about 2 years ago.

Currently, all 63 of the term life insurance companies we work with have at least a 5 - to 10 - year waiting period AFTER your probation / parole has ended.

According to The Harvard Crimson report, the former student — who was originally sentenced to ten years of probation in December of 2010 — allegedly violated the terms of his probation when he submitted a resume that indicated he had attended Harvard and now faces a two - and - a-half year prison sentence if he is found to have violated his probation.

and go up with one including a jail term and 3 years probation.