Does adjusting stocks - bonds allocations according to trend following rules improve the performance of 30 -
year retirement portfolios?
You can see what happens at the midpoint with a 30 -
year retirement portfolio.
Not exact matches
This involves taking the estimates that clients have come up with for what they expect to spend in
retirement — and then running a simulation of what would happen to their
portfolio if they spent 25 % more than that over each of their first 15
years.
For example, a couple nearing
retirement with a $ 750,000
retirement portfolio would pay about $ 18,000 a
year in fees if they were completely invested in typical mutual funds.
To use a concrete example, if you have a million bucks socked away for
retirement, drawing down $ 30,000 a
year (in addition to any other sources like Social Security or pensions) is a conservative enough choice that you should be able to sleep at night, confident that even extreme swings in the market won't harm your ability to keep your
portfolio healthy into your nineties.
If the same person instead invested a little less each
year (6 % of his income) in a
portfolio weighted 80 % to higher - returning equities and 20 % to bonds, he would only have $ 469,000 at
retirement.
The conventional wisdom is to withdraw 4 % of the value of your
retirement portfolio every
year, no matter the market situation.
That has been part of the appeal of the so - called «4 percent rule» — an investment - income strategy that says as long as you withdraw no more than 4 percent of your initial
portfolio, adjusted for inflation, on an annual basis during your
retirement years, you shouldn't run out of money.
We forecast that your
portfolio will comfortably support your goals, including $ 60,000 per
year in «basic»
retirement spending.»
In the screenshot above, I plugged in my current age,
portfolio, and a target
retirement age of 45
years old to see how I would fare.
The analysis showed that with his current
portfolio, he was on track to paying a whopping $ 594,993 in fees over the next 26
years and losing 3
years of
retirement, due entirely to hidden fees:
We also have 10 +
years before we draw down our
retirement portfolio.
The study found that you can withdraw 4 % of your
portfolio the first
year of
retirement.
For example, a
portfolio that starts out strong in
retirement and has losses later will likely be in much better shape than one that has down
years early, even if strong performance in later
years brings its average return back in line with historical averages.
If you start extrapolating 15 % a
year returns in your
portfolio due to the past four
years, many of your other assumptions change e.g. age of
retirement, rate of savings, spending decisions, and so forth.
As clients near
retirement after a nine -
year bull run, looking to rebalance an equity - heavy
portfolio could be stymied by...
She plans to do so by investing 60 percent of her
portfolio in stock funds and 40 percent in individual bonds at the start of
retirement and moving to a 50 - 50 split in later
years.
When it comes to
retirement planning, the key question is how much the client can safely spend out of his or her
portfolio during the golden
years.
We also computed the
portfolio balance (in real dollars) at the end of the 35 -
year retirement period for successful scenarios.
Butler also said pre-retirees should think about what's changed since you first established your
retirement portfolio 20 or 30
years ago.
In order to be consistent with some of the other studies mentioned previously, we redefined
portfolio success by shortening the
retirement period to 30
years.
Finally, we inverted our model to calculate the sustainable withdrawal rate (the maximum rate at which a given
portfolio may be drawn down without depleting the
portfolio before the end of the 35 -
year retirement horizon) for each of the 100 scenarios.
Most experts would suggest that a 23 -
year - old invest 80 % to 90 % of
retirement funds in a well - diversified stock
portfolio.
Since he is roughly 40
years from
retirement, he can afford to take on more risk in his
portfolio, and we can see that stocks make up at least 90 % in both
portfolios.
Here's an interesting question for investment professionals: Do you have a retiree with an equity heavy
portfolio who has to make a withdrawal in a bear market during the early
years of the client's
retirement?
After making this discovery, it only took him a few hours of adjusting his
portfolio with the help of Personal Capital's fee analyzer to reduce his potential fees to just $ 86,163, saving him over $ 500,000 dollars and shaving 2
years from his path to
retirement.
«It may be helpful for
retirement savers to reevaluate their investment
portfolios to avoid losses from a significant market downturn as they approach
retirement and then spend their first
years in
retirement.
This account I started this
year after reading about it from several different authors on Seeking Alpha (side note: if you are interested in Dividend Growth Investing and managing your
retirement portfolio you HAVE to check out this site, it's one of my main sources for stock research).
The free analysis showed that with his current
portfolio, he was on track to paying a whopping $ 594,993 in fees over the next 26
years and losing 3
years of
retirement, due entirely to hidden fees:
«Equities are the «five -
years - plus» part of your
portfolio,» he added, meaning that funds in your 401 (k) plan, IRA and other
retirement accounts that you don't need for five
years or more should be invested in stocks, since research has shown that over a period of five
years or longer, stocks generally perform better over other assets.
A diversified
portfolio may not help investors much this
year When stocks and bonds fall This is what life without
retirement savings looks like.
You are flat out wrong if you believe a 25 - 30
year old investor who makes monthly contributions to a boring dividend
portfolio will struggle to reach financial independence by
retirement.
2016.12.12 RBC Global Asset Management Inc. launches RBC
Retirement Portfolios and new education centre RBC Global Asset Management Inc. (RBC GAM Inc.) today announced the launch of RBC
Retirement Portfolios, a unique solution bringing over 30
years of asset allocation experience to help investors reach their
retirement goals...
RBC Global Asset Management Inc. (RBC GAM Inc.) today announced the launch of RBC
Retirement Portfolios, a unique solution bringing over 30
years of asset allocation experience to help investors reach their
retirement goals...
Indeed, Finke said that he's most proud of a series of articles that he wrote last
year along with American College professor Wade Pfau and David Blanchett, head of
retirement research at Morningstar, that looked at the impact of low asset yields on the sustainability of
retirement portfolios.
Additionally, when asked about their reaction to a 5 % decline in their
retirement portfolio, just 39 % said they would be concerned, down from 44 % last
year.
The default assumptions for comparing the harvesting strategies are 60:40 equity bonds, 30
year retirement and
portfolios of bonds in intermediate (not short) term treasuries and stock in 70 % total market and 10 % each in small company, small value and large value.
For us — with 35 +
years of «
retirement» ahead — I think the investments need to grow faster than the usual «cautious»
retirement portfolios would do.
Also, consider how important that goal is from the perspective of your long
retirement horizon where you need real continuous income along the way and the benefits of enjoying that income when you are relatively healthy and younger (< 70
years) while staying in an equity - heavy
portfolio.
It's tough imagining what life will be like 30 -
years into the future after you've worked to build your
retirement portfolio.
If this individual extended
retirement by another two
years, the size of the
retirement portfolio increases by another $ 50,000, to nearly $ 540,000.
Five
years before
retirement, UK index - linked gilts (cyan) come into play to help protect the
portfolio from inflation.
Partial
years of withdrawal are recorded if combined
portfolio value at any
year is not enough to support expected
retirement spending at any
year.
What would you do if your
retirement portfolio took a major hit in the
years right before you planned to retire?
Despite the annual drawdowns,
Portfolio 2 has actually increased in value 10
years into
retirement: it's worth $ 1,157,844.
The owner of
Portfolio 1 experiences the following annual returns during the first five
years of
retirement: -8.4 percent, 4 percent, 14.3 percent, 19 percent, and -14.8 percent.
Investors within 10
years of
retirement may lean their
portfolios toward variable annuities that offer market upside potential until
retirement, and then guaranteed income.
If the stock market is down in the early
years of your
retirement and you have to sell stocks at a loss to get enough income for your basic expenses, you can really hurt your
portfolio's value in both the short run and the long run.
It's important to protect your
retirement portfolio against the possibility of a market downturn in the
years immediately before and after your
retirement.
Sequence of returns risk is a fancy way of saying that it matters not only how much your
retirement portfolio earns each
year on average, but how much it earns in any given
year.