Sentences with phrase «year return periods»

The effect is minimal for average indices but is statistically significant in a subset of models for projected changes of 10 and 20 - year return periods.

Increases have also been reported for rarer precipitation events (1 in 50 year return period), but only a few regions have sufficient data to assess such trends reliably.

Increases have also been reported for rarer precipitation events (1 in 50 year return period), but only a few regions have sufficient data to assess such trends reliably (see Figure TS.10).

There is a mere 0.2 percent probability that in any given it will happen, meaning these events have a 500 - year return period.

The first flood has a 5 year return period that increases by 1 a year until it reaches about 100.

Not exact matches

Average annual core return on equity over a period is the ratio of: a) the sum of core income less preferred dividends for the periods presented to b) the sum of: 1) the sum of the adjusted average shareholders» equity for all full years in the period presented, and 2) for partial years in the period presented, the number of quarters in that partial year divided by four, multiplied by the adjusted average shareholders» equity of the partial year.

This chart shows the best and worst annual returns stocks generated over the last 141 years based on different holding periods:

Back - tested, the LTVC produced a 10 - year annual return of 7.7 %, a healthy premium over the 4.9 % the S&P Global 1200 returned over the same period.

«I argued that active investment management by professionals - in aggregate - would over a period of years under - perform the returns achieved by rank amateurs who simply sat still.

«As a long - term value investor, we remain cautious and recognise that to generate good real returns over time, we have to be prepared for periods of underperformance relative to the market indices, some even for a stretch of several years.»

During the 20 - year period ending in 2012, the S&P 500 index returned an annual average of 8.21 percent, but the average person who invested in stock - market mutual funds earned only 4.25 percent.

The title spent the first 18 years of its life in mixed case, and returned to it for a brief period in the early 1950s.

A 10 - times return over six years, a hypothetical holding period, means an investor rate of return of 46 percent, although returns are inherently diluted by other investments in the portfolio.

Actual results, including with respect to our targets and prospects, could differ materially due to a number of factors, including the risk that we may not obtain sufficient orders to achieve our targeted revenues; price competition in key markets; the risk that we or our channel partners are not able to develop and expand customer bases and accurately anticipate demand from end customers, which can result in increased inventory and reduced orders as we experience wide fluctuations in supply and demand; the risk that our commercial Lighting Products results will continue to suffer if new issues arise regarding issues related to product quality for this business; the risk that we may experience production difficulties that preclude us from shipping sufficient quantities to meet customer orders or that result in higher production costs and lower margins; our ability to lower costs; the risk that our results will suffer if we are unable to balance fluctuations in customer demand and capacity, including bringing on additional capacity on a timely basis to meet customer demand; the risk that longer manufacturing lead times may cause customers to fulfill their orders with a competitor's products instead; the risk that the economic and political uncertainty caused by the proposed tariffs by the United States on Chinese goods, and any corresponding Chinese tariffs in response, may negatively impact demand for our products; product mix; risks associated with the ramp - up of production of our new products, and our entry into new business channels different from those in which we have historically operated; the risk that customers do not maintain their favorable perception of our brand and products, resulting in lower demand for our products; the risk that our products fail to perform or fail to meet customer requirements or expectations, resulting in significant additional costs, including costs associated with warranty returns or the potential recall of our products; ongoing uncertainty in global economic conditions, infrastructure development or customer demand that could negatively affect product demand, collectability of receivables and other related matters as consumers and businesses may defer purchases or payments, or default on payments; risks resulting from the concentration of our business among few customers, including the risk that customers may reduce or cancel orders or fail to honor purchase commitments; the risk that we are not able to enter into acceptable contractual arrangements with the significant customers of the acquired Infineon RF Power business or otherwise not fully realize anticipated benefits of the transaction; the risk that retail customers may alter promotional pricing, increase promotion of a competitor's products over our products or reduce their inventory levels, all of which could negatively affect product demand; the risk that our investments may experience periods of significant stock price volatility causing us to recognize fair value losses on our investment; the risk posed by managing an increasingly complex supply chain that has the ability to supply a sufficient quantity of raw materials, subsystems and finished products with the required specifications and quality; the risk we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or amortizable assets become impaired; risks relating to confidential information theft or misuse, including through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion; our ability to complete development and commercialization of products under development, such as our pipeline of Wolfspeed products, improved LED chips, LED components, and LED lighting products risks related to our multi-year warranty periods for LED lighting products; risks associated with acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures or investments generally; the rapid development of new technology and competing products that may impair demand or render our products obsolete; the potential lack of customer acceptance for our products; risks associated with ongoing litigation; and other factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2017, and subsequent reports filed with the SEC.

Through 2010, S corporations beyond the seventh year of this so - called «built - in gains holding period» get a break: the taxes on realized gains, normally paid at the highest corporate tax rate before being taxed once more on an individual return, are waived entirely.

Companies that meet these criteria are ranked by revenue growth rate, EPS growth rate, and three - year annualized total return for the period ended June 30, 2017.

The study examined returns in a diversified portfolio of 60 percent stocks and 40 percent bonds over rolling 30 - year periods starting in 1926.

According to the Times, a BlackRock report «has calculated that if the financial transaction tax were set at 0.1 % per trade, an investor putting $ 10,000 in its global equity fund would lose more than $ 2,300 in expected returns over a 10 - year period.

According to McKinsey, it's not that today's market is abnormally weak — but because the period between 1985 and 2014 was simply a «golden era» of investing in which returns exceeded the 100 - year average.

After five years the company would return the principal to all investors who had not, within a specified period, chosen to convert the debt to common stock.

Fuerst, along with fellow University of Miami professors Sandro Andrade and Vidhi Chhaochharia, reported in a 2012 paper that stock returns were 10 percent higher in the November - to - April half of the year than in the May - to - October period.

Shiller has argued that the CAPE is remarkably good at predicting returns over the period of several years.

Rather, they examined returns across 37 markets within a 14 - year time period that was not tested in a prior paper that also found support for the sell in May effect.

«if the financial transaction tax were set at 0.1 percent per trade, an investor putting $ 10,000 in its global equity fund would lose more than $ 2,300 in expected returns over a 10 - year period.

The total transaction tax over a 10 - year period is only about $ 23, and our retirement saver gives up about $ 35 in 10 - year returns.»

This assertion had three components: (1) The commenter estimated the cost over 60 days to be $ 250 million based on the on - going cost from the final 2016 RIA of $ 1.5 billion per year, (2) that cost savings over a 10 - year period were not provided to allow comparison to the negative effects on investors that would occur over the ten year period, (3) that industry cost savings were not projected out over 10 years using returns on capital in a similar manner to investors» lost earnings.

Assuming nominal returns are 6.5 % a year, a straightforward calculation shows the transactions tax will raise about $ 6.75 from our hypothetical retirement saver over the stipulated 10 - year holding period.

Finally, by substituting the historic linear trend above into the IRR term of this equation, and the industry average investment period of 13 years into the c term, we get the following formula, which shows that nominal R&D productivity / ROI currently stands at about 1.2 (i.e., we get only 20 % back on top of our original R&D investment after 13 years), is declining exponentially by about 10 % per year, and will hit 1.0 (zero net return on investment) by 2020:

The Department estimates that the ten - year cost savings, which also include returns on the cost savings that occur in the April 10, 2017, to January 1, 2018 time period, are $ 123 million using a three percent discount rate, and $ 114 million using a seven percent discount rate.

One - third of performance share awards, which make up 50 % of long - term incentive compensation, are tied to average return on invested capital over a three - year period.

As of April 30, 2014, the Highland Long / Short Healthcare Fund Class A, A-LW, C and Z absolute rankings were 2, 2, 4 and 1, respectively, based on Total Return for the 1 - year period among 246 funds in the Morningstar Long / Short Equity Category.

Looking over the two - year period, we see that realized price returns have been driven almost exclusively by changes in equity prices (below chart).

So while there could be one or even five year periods where longer maturity bonds perform fairly well from these yield levels, over the long - term they're likely to be a poor investment in terms of earning a decent return over the rate of inflation.

It saw 26.38 % for aggregate yearly returns for a 5 - year period, while NASDAQ only saw 18.47 %.

One of my astute readers, named Jim, wondered how far out of whack the returns can get over any one year period from this long - term trendline.

So if you hired someone or subcontracted some work to someone sometime during the current tax year, when you were claiming their wages or fees as an expense (on Form T2125 of the T1 income tax return if your business is a sole proprietorship or a partnership), you would deduct the GST / HST if you had already claimed it as GST / HST paid out when you filed your GST / HST return for the appropriate period.

Other than that one time, over any ten year period, long bonds never showed a negative nominal return.

Over the full period analyzed, the benchmark has returned 6.9 % to investors versus 8.1 % for the comparative universe, but much of the performance in more recent years remains unrealized.

It found that in the 17 - year period to December 2000, the S&P 500 returned an average of 16.29 % per year, while the typical equity investor achieved only 5.32 % for the same period — a startling 9 % difference!

During the same period, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index returned just 2.0 % a year, providing a total return of 22 %.

A portfolio of five - year notes (20 %), long - term government bonds (35 %), long - term corporate bonds (30 %) and one - month t - bills (15 %) returned 2.7 % a year for this 32 year period.

June 1, 2016: A recent paper published by MSCI shows that Systematic Equity Strategy (SES) factors earned positive returns over a 20 - year period.

When the PE creeps past 20, there has never been a 10 - year period where stock returns later exceeded 10 % annually and 20 periods where they didn't.

It also found that during the same period, the average fixed - income investor earned only a 6.08 % return per year, while the long - term Government Bond Index reaped 11.83 %.

It's quite obvious that the 5.5 % difference in 10 year treasury returns is the reason for the difference in returns considering the S&P 500 had fairly similar performance over both periods.

I've broken up the annual returns for a 60/40 portfolio made up of the S&P 500 and 10 year treasuries by two very different periods.

Now take a look at the range in returns for the 60/40 portfolio over 10 year periods along with the largest annual losses:

What's interesting to note is that the worst 10 year returns for both periods came right after huge bear markets in stocks — 1974 in the first instance and 2008 in the second one.

In this example, the «inflation portfolio» improved the average real returns of both the conservatively positioned income - oriented retiree's and the young worker's portfolios by 0.7 percentage points per year during the extremely inflationary period from 1965 to 1980.

Based on the fund's monthly returns over the 3 - year period ended as of the date of the calculation.