Sentences with phrase «year trend sufficient»

Is this 20 year trend sufficient to determine whether the model sensitivity was too high?

Is this 20 year trend sufficient to determine whether the model sensitivity was too high?

Not exact matches

Increases have also been reported for rarer precipitation events (1 in 50 year return period), but only a few regions have sufficient data to assess such trends reliably.

However, I've found that using a 20 year period is sufficient to smooth out short term trends and give us at least some feel for what's going on.

I found I needed either a gazillion data points over a few years (impossible), or a few data points taken separated by a gazillion days, to have numbers sufficient for detecting any trend on a small area, and realized I had a 200 year project going.

Once you read Tamino you know picking 9 years isn't sufficient to tell anything about a trend in this particular measure; it's noisy.

Increases have also been reported for rarer precipitation events (1 in 50 year return period), but only a few regions have sufficient data to assess such trends reliably (see Figure TS.10).

«None of the [most recent] 10 - year trends is «statistically significant» but that's only because the uncertainties are so large — 10 years isn't long enough to determine the warming trend with sufficient precision.

Rereading the statement above I'm guessing that while 17 years is necessary to identify warming, the absence of such a trend during that span is not sufficient to rule warming out.

As well, the statement «Whether we have the 1000 year trend right is far less certain» is in fact an admission of the lack of sufficient knowledge about the correctness of the application of the reconstruction procedure and really should not be interpreted as a scientific assessment of statistical uncertainty.

When you have data for thousands of years, that single location is sufficient for spotting long term trends.

A single location with data for thousands of years, which is sufficient to plot general trends in earth's temperature as a whole.

There haven't yet been 15 years since 2001, but even hindcasting to include the running 10 - 15 year trend lines between 1990 and today, one doesn't develop sufficient exceptions to the rising trend to declare a falling or level trend overall by that standard.

* «UK rainfall shows large year to year variability, making trends hard to detect» * «While connections can be made between climate change and dry seasons in some parts of the world, there is currently no clear evidence of such a link to recent dry periods in the UK» * «The attribution of these changes to anthropogenic global warming requires climate models of sufficient resolution to capture storms and their associated rainfall.»

Their conclusion: «We conclude that there is sufficient evidence in temperature data in the past 130 - 160 years to reject the hypothesis of no warming trend in temperatures at the usual levels of signi... ficance.»

Their conclusion: «there is sufficient evidence in temperature data in the past 130 - 160 years to reject the hypothesis of no warming trend in temperatures at the usual levels of significance»