After the station moved, between 1974 - 2004 Walpole temperatures averaged 2.89 + / - 1.29 F warmer than Medway, but with similar year - to -
year variability ranging between 1.5 cooler one year to 4.5 warmer another.
Not exact matches
In fact, sample sex ratios collected for loggerhead turtles for more than 10
years in Palm Beach County, Fla. show significant
variability, with highly female - biased ratios being produced over a wider
range of temperatures than are found in many well - controlled laboratory studies.
Despite large
year - to -
year variability of temperature, decadal averages reveal isotherms (lines of a given average temperature) moving poleward at a typical rate of the order of 100 km / decade in the past three decades [101], although the
range shifts for specific species follow more complex patterns [102].
In the next 50
years, even the lower limit of impending climate change — an additional global mean warming of 1 degree Celsius above the last decade — is far beyond the
range of climate
variability experienced during the past thousand
years and poses global problems in planning for and adapting to it.
As to the bottom line, we are talking about changes to a fundamental part of the ocean carbon cycle, far outside the
range of natural
variability, that are irreversible and will last for thousands of
years.
Global temperature has in recent
years increased more slowly than before, but this is within the normal natural
variability that always exists, and also within the
range of predictions by climate models — even despite some cool forcing factors such as the deep solar minimum not included in the models.
Long - term climate
variability is the
range of temperatures and weather patterns experienced by the Earth over a scale of thousands of
years.
Within the
range of natural
variability that has existed for the last thousand
years?
Why not construct some emissions scenarios that cover what you think might happen over the next 50 (or 100)
years, and then run those scenarios through a
range of leading climate models, performing multiple runs for each model to capture both the uncertainty in the model physics and internal
variability.
The fact that there is interdecadal
variability (things have flattened out a bit over the past few
years) is really nothing too shocking and fits well within the
range of predictions.
Thus the core - mantle interaction is believed to dominate the
variability over a wide
range of timescales from
years to centuries.
«The planet has warmed and cooled several times over the past 150
years, all within the
range of natural climate
variability.
We probably won't have a good idea of the
range of natural
variability of a few
years, then we can find out if «sensitivity: really makes any sense as it is currently defined.
Our results show that this expected
range resulting from internal
variability of the NAO is substantial for both SAT and P trends over the next 30
years, and in the case of P can even change the sign of the trend.
In summary, our results show that in the CESM - LE, the
range of uncertainty in projected NAO trends and associated influences on SAT and P over the next 30
years can be obtained to a large degree from the Gaussian statistics of NAO
variability during the historical period, with some regional exceptions possibly associated with AMOC
variability.
That's your problem, you want exactly, when the best nature can give you is within the
range of
year to
year natural
variability.
A key question was: were there systematic or physical changes that contributed to a greater observed sea ice extent this
year or was it within the
range of natural
variability?
On short time scales (decade to centuries), there is no satisfactory way of sorting out forced climate
variability from natural internal climate
variability unless you have a really good climate model that can adequately handle the natural internal
variability on the
range of time scales from
years to millennia.
It looks like the authors have calculated two standard deviations from the 10 -
year SMOOTHED curve to assess the
range of natural
variability.
Science assessments indicate that human activities are moving several of Earth's sub-systems outside the
range of natural
variability typical for the previous 500,000
years (1, 2).
The flat period of 15
years fits in the expected
range of
variability, but its likelihood is certainly rather low, perhaps of the order of 5 %.
Despite large
year - to -
year variability of temperature, decadal averages reveal isotherms (lines of a given average temperature) moving poleward at a typical rate of the order of 100 km / decade in the past three decades [101], although the
range shifts for specific species follow more complex patterns [102].
What the paleoclimate information does indicate is that the warmth of the past 50
years is not outside the
range of natural
variability and is no cause for alarm.
The observed recession of glaciers (Box 1.1) during the last century is larger than at any time over at least the last 5,000
years, is outside of the
range of normal climate
variability, and is probably induced by anthropogenic warming (Jansen et al., 2007).
Climate - Climate in a narrow sense is usually defined as the average weather, or more rigorously, as the statistical description in terms of the mean and
variability of relevant quantities over a period of time
ranging from months to thousands or millions of
years.
Phase relationships between hemispheric and global climate reconstructions from tree - rings and the solar irradiance time series indicate a lag of ~ 10
years (
range, 5 - 20
years), with solar changes leading temperature anomalies, consistent with both climate modeling and other climate and solar
variability studies (Eichler et al., 2009; Breitenmoser et al., 2012; Anchukaitis et al., 2017).
However, excluding the most recent 30
years, as Hansen does, is question - begging — it assumes what Hansen sets out to prove, namely, that the current climate is outside the
range of natural
variability.
This
year's late winter heat wave over much of the United States, dubbed «March Madness,» has been cited as evidence that human - induced global warming is causing the climate system to stray far outside its normal
range of
variability.
Modeling studies suggest that we need ~ 500
years of observations to sample the full
range of ENSO decadal
variability (e.g., Wittenberg 2009).
It seemed that the present day was likely not much or very little outside the
range of climate
variability for the last 2000
years and that no government action or policy was required or would be useful with regard to postulated anthropogenic CO2 driven climate change.
Within this uncertainty
range, this reconstruction suggests that the pronounced decline in summer Arctic sea ice cover that began in the late twentieth century is unprecedented in both magnitude and duration when compared with the
range of
variability of the previous roughly 1,450
years.
Present - day ocean models do have some rudimentary capability to model El Nino - like
variability, but they are not yet able to reliably simulate decadal - type
variability, even though 1000 -
year climate runs exhibit
variability over a broad
range of time scales.
Atmospheric processes that generate internal
variability are known to operate on time scales
ranging from virtually instantaneous (e.g., condensation of water vapour in clouds) up to
years (e.g., troposphere - stratosphere or inter-hemispheric exchange).
The research demonstrates that modern snowfall in the iconic Alaska
Range is unprecedented for at least the past 1200
years and far exceeds normal
variability.
Variables explaining a significant component of yield variance are nitrogen, irrigation water, and precipitation; temperature was a less significant component of yield variation within the
range of observed
year - to -
year variability at the study sites.
Roy Spencer, principal research scientist at the University of Alabama - Huntsville, says, «The main thing they're trying to show is that the recent warming and moistening in the last 30
years is outside the
range of natural
variability, and that man is causing the warming.
While sea ice was more extensive in 2013 than in other recent
years, it fits into
range of
variability characteristic of the time period 2007 - 2011 with a similar path of summer ice evolution as 2009 (Figure 2).
Climate, sometimes understood as the «average weather,» is defined as the measurement of the mean and
variability of relevant quantities of certain variables (such as temperature, precipitation or wind) over a period of time,
ranging from months to thousands or millions of
years.