The satellite temperature anomalies and 3 -
year warming trends calculated and plotted using Excel; datasets used to produce monthly anomalies in an equal - weighted combination of two satellite datasets - RSS and UAH.
Not exact matches
Since we already have data for the full
year of 2011, I have
calculated the
warming trend required for the next 9
years to reach 0.2 deg C over the entire 20 -
year period (and that is a linear
warming rate of around 0.556 degC per decade, or a linear
warming of 0.5 degC over the 9 -
year period that is still left.
As a result, these two
years may be used as start and end points in
calculating the global
warming trend:
They found that the
warming in the data - sparse regions was progressing faster than the global average (especially during the past couple of
years) and that when they included the data that they derived for these regions in the computation of the global average temperature, they found the global
trend was higher than previously reported — just how much higher depended on the period over which the
trend was
calculated.
«To remove the
warming rate due to the multidecadal oscillation of about 60
years cycle, least squares
trend of 60
years period from 1945 to 2004 is
calculated.»
His unspoken argument is that you have to take a temperature
trend over complete cycle (s) in order to remove the cyclical effect: «To remove the
warming rate due to the multidecadal oscillation of about 60
years cycle, least squares
trend of 60
years period from 1945 to 2004 is
calculated ``.
The first new study
calculates the statistical likelihood of various amounts of
warming by the
year 2100 based on three
trends that matter most for how much carbon we put in the air.