Education World: Who is going to determine if a state is properly integrating adequate
yearly progress into its accountability systems?
Not exact matches
Most
yearly budgets are also divided up
into 12 months, with blank columns next to your estimates to fill in with your actual results as the year
progresses.
Besides, North Carolina's relatively high bar is the result of a now somewhat problematic NCLB provision known as the «20 percent rule,» which was inserted
into the law's «adequate
yearly progress» provisions.
The NCLB accountability system divides schools
into those in which a sufficient number of students score at the proficient level or above on state tests to meet Adequate
Yearly Progress (AYP) benchmarks («make AYP») and those that fail to make AYP.
In fact, this seems likely to occur once the requirement that all subgroups of students within a school make adequate
yearly progress comes
into effect.
Paul Ezen of New Hampshire asked, «Is the special ed population in the school going to throw a school
into [adequate
yearly progress] failure when the majority of the student body is making the goal?»
As the years passed and the «adequate
yearly progress» targets grew, he says, more and more schools in more and more states fell
into the category of «failing» — 50 percent, 60 percent, even 70 percent.
NCLB requires states to divide schools
into those making «Adequate
Yearly Progress» (AYP) toward the goal of having all of their students proficient in math and reading by 2014 and those that aren't.
FundEducationNow.org 07/06/09 * Adequate
Yearly Progress (AYP), HB 991, a priority of Education Commissioner Dr. Eric Smith was signed
into law last month by Governor Crist.
As as highlighted in the The Santa Fe New Mexican, he testified that he viewed the new system as «an improvement over past practices [namely the Adequate
Yearly Progress (AYP) measures written
into No Child Left Behind (NCLB)-RSB- because [he believed the new system gave] him more information about his teachers.»
As Dropout Nation has noted ad nauseam, few of the accountability systems allowed to replace No Child's Adequate
Yearly Progress provision are worthy of the name; far too many of them, including the A-to-F grading systems put
into place by such states as New Mexico (as well as subterfuges that group all poor and minority students
into one super-subgroup) do little to provide data families, policymakers, teachers, and school leaders need to help all students get high - quality education.
* Adequate
Yearly Progress (AYP), HB 991, a priority of Education Commissioner Dr. Eric Smith was signed
into law last month by Governor Crist.
In the past, CRT results would have factored
into determinations of whether schools made Adequate
Yearly Progress (AYP) under No Child Left Behind.
By the same token, when under - funded and under - resourced public schools do not show «adequate
yearly progress,» our response should be to find out why these schools are struggling, and provide them with the materials and support they need to improve — not for the charter management companies that run these schools to walk away before the end of the school year, forcing families to scramble to get their kids placed
into public schools with little notice and no assistance.