Not exact matches
So
over a period of 138 years, the increase in the
YEARLY AVERAGE of the
temperature of the ENTIRE EARTH is 0.8 degrees.
Our formula gives near the same variability of the
temperature / CO2 relationship for
yearly variations, but only a few ppmv increase in CO2, due to the slight (0.6 °C) rise in
temperature over the last century.
It now spends the vast majority of the money it does have fighting
yearly blazes, with little left
over to prepare for warming
temperatures.
--» The expected trend in
temperature does not necessarily rise above the expected level of
yearly variability
over the course of a decade.»
It fails to show the type of variation in
temperature that happens on a
yearly basis, much less the variation that takes place
over time.
I'll look at that web site (from where you provided the images) in more detail when I have a chance — at a first glance, though, where they assert «that the satellite data is inconclusive regarding any discernible trends in the global
yearly average
temperature over the last 25 years», is a bit odd, given the > 95 % statistical confidence in warming
over that time period (as per @ 30).
Presenting the magnitude of the
temperature change
over the past century relative to how much the
temperature changes on a daily or
yearly basis can be quite an eye opener to many people who seem to believe this warming is «dramatic».
My questions would be: do these new results affect the
yearly mean
temperature grid calculations
over the last 50 years?
If we are able to reduce the global average
yearly temperature to a single value, a value that is accurate to + / -.1 degree C,
over a period of 150 years and that indicates an increase of somewhat less than a degree C, what does that mean?
where dC (atm) is the
yearly change in CO2 (ppmv) F (emissions) the emissions in GtC; 0.21 the conversion factor GtC - > ppmv and dtemp the change in
temperature over a year.