These are some of the things I've heard teachers say over
the years about standardized test scores and the pressures surrounding student performance:
Not exact matches
Some of these
tests were the
standardized tests that the states or districts re-use each
year, and the teachers were worried
about kids cheating — sharing questions and answers with next
year's students.
Test results for third - through eighth - graders across New York state improved this
year even amid concerns
about the length of the
standardized exams and reports of erroneous questions, according to data released by the state Education Department.
It led to a boycott movement for the third - through eighth - grade
standardized tests that resulted in
about one - fifth of students opting out last
year.
Similarly, 27 percent oppose basing decisions
about teacher tenure on how well students progress on
standardized tests, nearly double the 14 percent opposed to the idea one
year ago.
After extensive research on teacher evaluation procedures, the Measures of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning
About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on
standardized test scores over multiple
years.
The PZC tackles challenging issues
about the kind of teaching and learning that should be done in classrooms all around the world, but is not being done, in part because of the pressure for certain performances on certain kinds of
standardized tests, in part because teachers teach what they were taught and in the ways that they were taught 10 or 50
years ago.
Over the
years, developers of
standardized achievement
tests have learned that if they can link students» success on a question to students» socioeconomic status (SES), then
about half of the
test takers usually answer that item correctly.
Scope: Comparative data
about class size, proficiency on
standardized tests, percentage of students who receive free or reduced - price school lunch, and proportion of first -
year teachers at a school; there's also a forum for parents to write reviews
about individual schools.
«If you go back 40 to 50
years ago to the time when
standardized testing was becoming very common in America's schools, the people who designed these
tests were adamant
about their appropriate use.
Kids need to score above the 97th percentile on a
standardized test in order to enter the admissions lottery and, every
year,
about two - thirds of those who qualify are shut out.
Yes, that
standardized testing data can be useful; however, we teachers spend the entire
year collecting all sorts of immediate and valuable information
about students that informs and influences how we teach, as well as where and what we review, readjust, and reteach.
Or it could simply be low motivation, since many students never hear
about their
standardized test results from previous
years?
She claims that with all the concern
about standardized tests at the end of the
year, many teachers forget that students need to know what they are working towards.
For several
years, data suggested that the city had seen improvements among all ethnic groups, including in graduation rates, which have risen
about 14 percentage points for black and Hispanic students since 2005, and a national
standardized test given every other
year to a sampling of fourth and eighth graders.
With word that some parents are already organizing on social media
about efforts to have their children «opt - out» of the
standardized tests in the coming school
year, Cuomo released a statement Thursday saying that while he agrees with the goal of Common Core standards, he believes the implementation by the NYS Education Department has been «deeply flawed.»
Last
year only
about 40 % of students scored proficient or above in reading on the state
standardized test, but 99.5 % of teachers are rated satisfactory.
When you are being abused or hearing
about children and parents being abused and harassed for opting out of the unfair and discriminatory Common Core SBAC
test or when you are paying more in taxes and watching important school programs and services cut, now that thanks to our elected and appointed officials we are pissing away $ 100,000,000.00 a
year forcing children to take a
test that will tell us that students from rich families tend to do better and student from poor families tend to do worse on
standardized tests.
Krystal Hardy, principal of Sylvanie Williams College Prep
about the 14
standardized tests some students at her school take each
year
While the teachers, districts, and the folks in Sacramento all have the luxury of five
years (as Michael Kirst likes to say) to figure things out with Common Core and the new wave of
standardized tests, what
about the 6 + million students in school right now?
With the second half of the school
year in full - swing, many educators are starting to think
about preparing their students for
standardized testing.
The dozen educators who stood trial, including five teachers and a principal, were indicted in 2013 after
years of questions
about how Atlanta students had substantially improved their scores on the Criterion - Referenced Competency
Test, a
standardized examination given throughout Georgia.
According to this
year's
standardized test results, statewide nearly 10 percent of English learners met or exceeded the English language arts standards, and
about 9 percent did so in math.
President Obama has now succumbed to the firestorm in opposition to
standardized and «high stakes»
testing that has swept the country over the past several
years, even picking up on the talking points — «Learning is
about so much more than just filling in the right bubble».
Student performance as measured on
standardized tests has improved
about 5 percent a
year since the school opened, D'Avignon said.
The survey asked a nationally representative sample of Americans
about the state of education and found that between May and June 2016 — over a
year after news accounts
about parents» opting their children out of school
tests became commonplace — the public's commitment to the use of
standardized tests to assess students and schools remains firm.
Obsessive reflection
about what happened in school yesterday, last week or last
year, coupled with the never ending demands of PLC meetings,
standardized testing prep and daily lesson planning can crush even the strongest educational leaders.
Yet when compared with this
year's ISTEP +, Wyoming's 2010 PAWS experience raises many of the same questions
about the future of online
standardized testing — in part, because the problems students experienced were the same.
It is my opinion after spending
about 40
years teaching elementary school (K — 5th grade in rural, urban, and suburban schools) that
standardized testing is a waste of time and resources for many reasons, one of which is that they do not
test what you want to know
about a child.
Each
year educators raise concerns
about the limitations of
standardized testing and the downside of «teaching to the
test» while policymakers and commentators discuss and pontificate
about the «shockingly poor results.»
will recall that over the past
year I have written numerous pieces
about Connecticut's charter schools and how they are «creaming off the best students» so that they can make it appear that they do a better job when it comes to getting
standardized test scores up.
People may disagree with these parents
about the value of giving dozens of
standardized tests every
year to children as young as 4 or 5.
After 15
years of mandated
testing under the No Child Left Behind Law, what do
standardized test scores actually tell us
about school and teacher quality?
About 75 percent of her students achieved scores on last
year's state
standardized test that put them in the proficient or advanced categories, she said.
Concerns
about whether students have to take too many
standardized tests have been raised for
years.
TRENTON — New Jersey's public school students racked up slightly higher
test scores in most grades in the 2010 - 11 school
year, despite Gov. Chris Christie's cutting
about $ 1 billion in state aid to schools that
year, according to
standardized test results released today by the state Board of Education.
The Council of the Great City Schools just released a study of the nation's 66 largest school districts that revealed that students spend approximately 20 - 25 hours per school
year taking these
standardized tests, which amounts to 2.3 % of classroom time for the average 8th grader who will take
about 112 of them between PreK and 12th grade, approximately 8 per
year.
Eight studies that tracked the academic achievement of students for an average of 3.75
years after a social and emotional learning program found that participants performed
about 13 percentage points higher in grades and
standardized test scores than their peers, according to a 2017 overview of 82 social and emotional studies by researchers affiliated with the Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning.