At least with Corbyn as leader we can offer a genuine alternative and appeal to voters fed up with ten
years of an austerity which owes everything to Tory ideology and nothing to good economic sense.
«After
years of austerity which have increased pressures on schools, the funding reforms must be managed in a way that does not add to the existing pressures on schools or result in «knee - jerk» responses that increase the burdens placed on teachers.
Not exact matches
Syriza,
which broke a two - party - led system, has disappointed some on the left for implementing
austerity measures and the reputation
of the mainstream parties remains damaged following what is perceived as
years of failed promises.
In December, the company,
which chooses the
year's top words based on out -
of - the - ordinary spikes in interest, announced that «
austerity» clinched the top spot in 2010.
These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated full
year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®;
austerity measures in European countries that may increase the amount
of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases in treatment duration; availability
of funding for state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven by federal and state grant cycles
which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused by the introduction
of generic versions
of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect
of lowering prices or reducing the number
of insured patients; the possibility
of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels
of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers
which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits
of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages
of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development
of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate
of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Five
years of failed
austerity policies in Greece and a total breakdown in trust between the leftwing Syriza alliance and the political leaders
of its creditors climaxed in a national vote in
which Greeks said no to the spending cuts and tax increases demanded by its lenders...
The summary
of their stats for Ontario, in the 11 -
year period, 1998 to 2009, was as follows: Private sector: Arbitrated settlements: 28 (50,828 employees) average annual increase: 2.5 % Non-arbitrated settlements: 1,877 (1,658,929 employees) average annual increase: 2.5 % Public sector: Arbitrated settlements: 407 (282,903 employees) average annual increase: 2.5 % Non-arbitrated settlements: 2,842 (2,875,878 employees) average annual increase: 2.7 % This says nothing,
of course,
of the base from
which those increases were granted, particularly after the public sector
austerity in Ontario during the 1990s.
If we compare operating spending by municipalities to GDP,
which is a broad measure
of ability to pay, it remains within historical averages
of close to 3 %
of GDP.  In 2012, operating spending by all municipalities in Canada amounted to just 3.1 %
of GDP, the same that it was twenty
years ago, and down from the 3.3 % reached in 2009 during the depths
of the recession.  This ratio was higher during the recession because GDP had dropped and governments sensibly embarked on stimulus spending to prevent a depression. This was before their misguided adventures in
austerity (
which presumably the CFIB supports, but have caused devastation to small businesses in countries elsewhere).
our greatest asset and the only thing i can agree with usmanov is that we have used his best
years for a miserable
austerity task for
which the rest
of owners / board were happy to watch him run it prudently but without facing to the reality that at some stage they will need ot back him aggressively either in transfers or with media / refs.
The problem is that in the bleak landscape
of austerity, where local councils have had their budgets halved since 2010 and are looking at losing another third
of their funding over the next four
years, a service
which isn't even used by their own residents could start to look like an easy cut to make.
The Shadow Chancellor will call for a Budget that deals with the growing emergency faced by working families and our vital public services,
which have been left in crisis after seven
years of Tory
austerity.
City Hall officers believe it could cost up to # 2.14 million over the next four
years which can not be justified at a time
of austerity.
«A key challenge the Government faces in securing a fair funding system is a legacy
of the last six
years of misguided economic
austerity which has been to the detriment
of schools and pupils.
All
of that remaining cash will be saved in the 2015/16 financial
year - that extra 12 months
of austerity which the coalition has now, reluctantly, decided to push on with.
Plaid's approach is based around a rejection
of the
austerity policies,
which the coalition government has followed for the past five
years.
«Eight
years of Tory
austerity,
which Labour will bring to an end, have had a disastrous effect on our vital public services and workers have paid a heavy price in the cost
of living and their working lives.
However, the health and social care sector have experienced challenges in recent
years as a result
of austerity measures in the public sector
which has had implications for the pay and pensions
of those working in the sector.
As
austerity measures have rolled out in recent
years, numbers
of support works have declined, class sizes have increased further, all
of which seems to cause the perfect storm
of poor teacher retention and the concomitant low teacher recruitment.