Sentences with phrase «years of cooling»

30 years of cooling during a period of increasing CO2 levels definitely raises a few questions.

Ten or even greater number of years of cooling does not mean there is no long term warming and to determine if there is long term warming we MUST use a longer period than ten years.

Anyone have any disagreements with my statement that the Steig paper showed approximately 30 years of cooling since the quick warming??

You accuse me of ignoring 20 years of cooling on the Antarctic.

At a minimum, the net contribution of AMO to global temperature increases from 1980 to the present is zero (15 years of cooling from 1980 to 1995, 15 years of warming from 1995 to 2010), meaning that all of the warming over that 30 year period is attributable to CO2.

Just because there are a few years of cooling mixed in with a few years of warming is, of course, really meaningless in trying to ascertain what climate is doing long term.

It showed two warming periods but they were separated by 30 years of cooling.

About every 100 thousand years the earth goes through a glacial hot and cold cycle with about 10,000 years of increased Heat followed by about 90,000 years of Cooling.

There is a lag period before increases reverse to decreases, but with 30 — 50 years of cooling ahead, we will be able to see it happen.

That leaves just a see - saw temperature curve above 40 degrees, consisting of 25 years of cooling followed by 23 years of warming.

\ by my calculations the Gleissberg cycle is 87 years, not 88 years as reported by most, consisting of a sinewave with 43.5 years of warming followed by 43.5 years of cooling.

Now with have10 years of cooling and the modeling — a — teers can not figure why the models arent working.

That would make the RSS data show 23 - 28 years of cooling.

All the last 17 years of cooling has done is alter some public opinion but not enough to make a difference.

We have no idea when the Modern Warming will end, or whether it already ended a decade ago, but ice core studies suggest several hundred years of warming, followed by several hundred years of cooling, are typical of historical climate cycles between the ice ages..

It seems to me they will be in trouble if the hiatus exceeds in length that of the warming trend, because as Steve points out, there was 40 years of cooling before that warming.

UAH shows 14 years of cooling from Jan 1980 to Dec 1994.

We know not whether we are in for another 20 years of cooling or warming.

Warming will resume after a few hundred years of cooling.

The allegedly warming earth is in for about 30 years of cooling according to NASA, one of the leading global warming theory advocates.

Medium term, years of cooling will dissolve any serious regard for CAGW among the informed, and long term, the warmista high priests will have their names enshrined in the language, as being synonymous with fraud, chicanery, duplicity, prevarication... etc..

What is left of his original 100 year warming after this amputation is a see - saw temperature curve, 25 years of cooling followed by 23 years of warming.

However, 500 years of cooling should follow.

But momentous things are happening, as the earth is about to enter the ice ages after millions of years of a cooling and drying trend that has started to create savannas in Africa's Rift Valley.

Do these models also predict the current nine years of cooling or when the 2ppmv annual increase in CO2 concentrarion will once again cause catastropic global warming as predicted by the models in the IPCC 2001TAR which predicted the non existant warming from human sourced CO2 emissions over the past ten years that never happened?

Volcanic aerosols will cool depending on the quantity and duration of their contribution to stratospheric aerosols, with Pinatubo (1991) associated with two to three years of cooling.

Now we have two mysterious happenings — sudden start of warming and thirty years of cooling — that must be explained.

Further, the warming, once started, came to a halt in mid-century and thirty years of cooling followed.

I assume the Poles will continue to be colder than the Tropics at sea level, and that the Earth will continue its four and a half billion years of cooling.

The PDO index is negative again — are you predicting 30 years of cooling, starting in 2007?

-LSB-...] Surely a few more years of cooling will leave only the true believers in their misanthropic ideology, and the truly idiotic.

And to repeat, we MAY be on a downslope (even the CRU staff and «team» discussed the possibility of 20 years of cooling seriously amongst themselves (whilst themselves still believing that AGW would continue afterwards) if they can consider this, why not you.

Using data gathered from tree rings, etc. her and other scientists in the 60's predicted that global warming would resume by 1980 for 2 decades (at the time there had been a cooling trend since a warming peak in the 1930's - and there was scientific consensus of that as all the charts as of the 1980's showed that) followed by 50 years of cooling AND they predicted a spike in cooling around 2020.

Thereafter 500 years of cooling.

(20 - 30 or more years of cooling)

After 30 + million years of cooling, 2 to 3 million years ago, colder ocean waters eventually upwelled in the mid latitudes along the west coasts of major continents as well as along the equator.

The warming began suddenly after a good ten years of cooling.

There is a longer - term cycle of about 1,000 years which will ensure 500 years of cooling.

A lot of overbloated over confidence that can not survive a few years of cooling.

Another 10 years of cooling is expected.

Thus it is not logical to argue that, because CO2 does not cause the first thousand years or so of warming, nor the first thousand years of cooling, it can not have caused part of the many thousands of years of warming in between.

No climate model predicted the last seven years of cooling and none can explain it.

Because the decade from 1991 through 2000 wasn't monotonically increasing from, say, 1994 after some number of years of cooling due to Pinatubo.

How many years of cooling will it take before AGW theory is debunked?

Assuming you believe that the Arctic's temperature rise since the mid-1990s has been caused by CO2, how do you explain the ~ 40 years of cooling that preceded the warming — since CO2 was rapidly rising during both the cooling and warming periods?

The real solution, according to Lochbaum and other experts, is to require spent fuel to be moved from pools to more permanent storage in massive concrete and steel casks after five years of cooling down.

With the climate having entered a cold PDO (pacific decadel oscillation) which means 20 — 40 years of cooler, wetter weather, more prevalent and stronger La Ninas (like we are currently having), and less prevalent and weaker El Ninos.

Hopefully, it really is due to CO2, because then we can mitigate the next 30 years of cool phase by keeping CO2 levels high.

Not exact matches

A couple of years ago, all the cool kids were chasing VR — raising money, building prototypes, waiting for the billions to roll in.

Tightening of monetary policy meant to cool the housing market over the past year, combined with a wind - down in public works, has served to slow GDP growth into the single digits.