Sentences with phrase «years of earnings»

In apartment invasion robberies, do you try to defend your castle and its contents, or give them the things you've worked so hard for and let them walk away with years of your earnings?

If you have at least 35 years of earnings, it may be difficult to tell how much advantage you'll get from working another year.

Now consider Saga's latest NAV of EUR 23.34 & its current 8.3 P / E ratio: Tot up a few more years of earnings (probably accompanied by rising prices), a sale or liquidation of the company (I believe current NAV is achievable), substantial compensation payment (s), and a sale of the valuable Saga Furs brand (to a Chinese owner, for example), and it's hard to argue there's significant downside risk here...

Stock Strategies Valuations, Inflation and Real Returns The Yale economics professor explains why he looks at 10 years of earnings and the importance of factoring in inflation when valuing assets.

If you have between 21 and 30 years of substantial earnings the percentage of benefit increases from 45 % with 21 years to the full 90 percent with 30 years of earnings.

The Yale economics professor explains why he looks at 10 years of earnings and the importance of factoring in inflation when valuing assets.

The P / E10 level (the price of an index over the average of the last 10 years of earnings) tells you how emotional investors are at any given time.

Shiller analyzed the S&P 500 Index from 1871 to the current day to determine if a ratio similar in nature to the common P / E ratio but with the added twist of 10 years of Earnings Per Share (EPS) data would be effective and more accurate in determining if the market as a whole was overvalued or undervalued.

Benjamin Graham recommended looking at the previous decade of earnings and the latest three years of earnings.

Professor Robert Shiller's P / E10, which uses the average of ten years of earnings, is a better predictor of Historical Surviving Withdrawal Rates than Tobin's Q.

Dividend Growth Baselines Dividend Growth Rates In my Addendum to Dividend Growth Rates, I wrote: «I examined the single - year payout ratio [D / E], the average of five years of single - year payout ratios [Average (D / E)-RSB- and the ratio of the average of five years of dividends to the average of five years of earnings [Average (D) / Average (E)-RSB-.

Using an alternate criterion (that the average of five years of payout ratios or the ratio of the average of five years of dividends divided by five years of earnings must be below 40 %), there were three sequences with returns less than 1 % over 5 - years: 1997, 1998 and 2000.

They were 35.3 % (single - year), 34.1 % (five year average of payout ratios) and 34.2 % (average of five years of dividends divided by the average of five years of earnings).

Once you are eligible for retirement (age 62, your Earliest Eligibility Age, or EEA), these years of earnings are put into a table and the indexes applied.

He calculates P - E ratios based on 10 years of earnings, just in case past - year earnings are unrealistically rich.

Since your PIA for retirement purposes will be calculated upon your reaching age 62 and the calculations are based upon your highest 35 earnings years (indexed) out of the most recent 40 years of earnings, those earlier years of earnings will not be part of your final PIA calculation.

Even if you already have 35 years of earnings, you can still increase your Social Security benefit if you earn more than your lowest - recorded years.

So you take an average of 10 years of earnings, so it's called the Cyclically Adjusted Price - Earnings ratio, that's where the CAPE comes from.

This is how the cyclically adjusted PE -LRB-» CAPE») is calculated and when its current value is compared with long - term average, using the geometric means of EPS and cyclically adjusted PEs, 6 it shows that the market is 37.7 % overpriced using 10 years of earnings» data and 45 % if 20 years are used.

The online Retirement Estimator is a convenient, secure and quick financial planning tool that eliminates the need to manually key in years of earnings information.

But, if you're retiring at 64, you'll have a lot more years of earnings to increase your average and your Social Security benefit amount.

P / E10 uses the current price and the average of the most recent trailing ten years of earnings.

Because it (100E10 / P) includes ten years of earnings, it protects us against the effects of surprise dividend cuts.

Or are the last 10 years of earnings the «new normal» so to speak?

Social Security is another vital source of income for many retirees, and your monthly benefit is based on your highest 35 years of earnings.

However, using a payout ratio based on ten years of earnings works well.

Price - to - earnings ratio is sensitive to cyclical peaks and troughs unless multiple years of earnings are used.

Many small caps don't have 10 years of earnings, so I thought PE10 wouldn't work well for them.

I looked at the difference between the latest five years of earnings and the earliest five years of earnings within a decade.

P / E10 is the current price of the S&P Index over average of the last 10 years of earnings.

I also looked at the difference between the latest three years of earnings and the earliest three years of earnings within a decade.

The company could repay all of its debt with cash on hand and two years of earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT).

(We use your 35 highest years of earnings to compute your retirement benefits.)

Professor Shiller's P / E10 for the S&P 500 is an extension of what Benjamin Graham advised for individual stocks: average 5 to 10 years of earnings.]

Today's P / E10 (i.e., the current price of the S&P 500 divided by the average of the previous ten years of earnings) is close to 27.

To get an accurate picture of whether the market is fair valued based on P / E ratio it is more accurate to take several years of earnings.

[The percentage earnings yield is 100 / [P / E10] where P / E10 is the current price of the S&P 500 index and E10 is the average of the most recent ten years of earnings.

[P / E10 is the latest index level (or price) of the S&P 500 index divided by the average of the previous ten - years of earnings.

In apartment invasion robberies, do you try to defend your castle and its contents, or give them the things you've worked so hard for and let them walk away with years of your earnings?

In short, it is all of the firms trading on US exchanges (that Media General covers) that have seven years of earnings history, and significant analyst coverage extending out for two years.

P / E10 is the current price (index value) of the S&P 500 divided by the average of the trailing ten years of earnings.

The «Revalued Earnings» part of CARE refers to the uprating of past years of earnings.

The reliance of the final - average - salary calculation on just the highest few years of earnings, rather than on lifetime wages (as in Social Security), creates disproportionate returns to late - career promotions.

This type of redistribution is inherent in any plan that bases benefits on the three highest end - of - career years of earnings, while contributions reflect earnings over the entire work life.

This would make pensions function more like Social Security, which bases its benefits off of 35 years of earnings and adjusts earlier years for inflation.

However, unlike the typical teacher pension, your Social Security retirement check is based on 35 years of earnings, not the highest two or three years.

How much higher can companies that already have the next 20 years of earnings growth built into the stock price go?

The only significant problem is that the maximum CPP benefit is very modest, just $ 1092.80 per month, and the average benefit is less than one half of that amount due to years of earnings below the maximum amount and years spent outside of the paid workforce.

Even if we were to completely zero out two solid years of earnings for the S&P 500, the fact is that more than 90 % of the value of U.S. stocks would reside in the cash flows beyond that point.

The answer is no, because the benefit payment is still based on your 35 highest years of earnings.