The WaPo reporters then claim, «But a U.S. Department of Education study released in June showed that students in the program generally scored no higher on reading and math tests after two
years than public school peers.»
Not exact matches
While we estimated that, after one
year, African - American students scored 7 percentile points higher on the math portion of the Iowa Test of Basic Skills
than their
peers in
public schools, Barnard reports impacts of 6 percentile points for African - American students from low - performing
public schools.
So, twenty
years after the enactment of Milwaukee's program, a growing body of research shows that students receiving vouchers do as well and often better
than their
peers in
public schools and at a fraction of the taxpayer cost.
While younger students may have benefited slightly from the voucher program after one
year, the older students who switched to private
schools scored significantly lower
than their
public -
school peers after one
year.
In 2007 they approved funding for the first
public Waldorf methods high
school, in the Sacramento Unified School District; and (3) Three key findings on urban public schools with Waldorf methods: (a) In their final year, the students in the study's four California case study public Waldorf - methods elementary schools match the top ten of peer sites on the 2006 California test scores and well outperform the average of their peers statewide; (b) According to teacher, administrator and mentor reports, they achieve these high test scores by focusing on those new three R's — rather than on rote learning and test prep — in a distinct fashion laid out by the Waldorf model and (c) A key focus is on artistic learning, not just for students but, more importantly perhaps, for the a
school, in the Sacramento Unified
School District; and (3) Three key findings on urban public schools with Waldorf methods: (a) In their final year, the students in the study's four California case study public Waldorf - methods elementary schools match the top ten of peer sites on the 2006 California test scores and well outperform the average of their peers statewide; (b) According to teacher, administrator and mentor reports, they achieve these high test scores by focusing on those new three R's — rather than on rote learning and test prep — in a distinct fashion laid out by the Waldorf model and (c) A key focus is on artistic learning, not just for students but, more importantly perhaps, for the a
School District; and (3) Three key findings on urban
public schools with Waldorf methods: (a) In their final
year, the students in the study's four California case study
public Waldorf - methods elementary
schools match the top ten of
peer sites on the 2006 California test scores and well outperform the average of their
peers statewide; (b) According to teacher, administrator and mentor reports, they achieve these high test scores by focusing on those new three R's — rather
than on rote learning and test prep — in a distinct fashion laid out by the Waldorf model and (c) A key focus is on artistic learning, not just for students but, more importantly perhaps, for the adults.
Charter kids also had higher proficiency gains
than their
public -
school peers compared with last
year.
Its children spend 60 % more time in class
than their
public school peers, and teachers» only hope for job security is improving student performance
year after
year.
For charter
schools in operation from five to eight
years, Hoxby finds that five percent more students reach proficiency in reading
than their
public school peers.
Public charter
school students continue to outperform their
peers, as AzMERIT results show charter students scored better
than the state average in virtually every grade level and subject area for the third straight
year.
Though they are
public school students like any other, each
public charter
school student is given, on average, $ 2,800 dollars less per
year than their
peers in traditional
public schools.
the typical student in a New York City
public charter
school gains more learning in a
year than his or her
peer in a district
public school, amounting to about one more month of learning in reading and five more months of learning in math.
Over the
years, though, most voucher recipients have performed no better academically
than their
public school peers.
A independent national study released this
year by the Center for Research on Education Outcomes shows charter
school students have greater learning gains in reading
than their
peers in traditional
public schools.
One example is a report released last month by the Washington D.C. - based Urban Institute, which found students in a statewide private
school choice program for four
years or more are 40 percent more likely to enroll in college
than their
public -
school peers.
«Policies and practices put in place by city leaders a number of
years ago have yielded greater equity over time, although charter students continue to receive less
public funding
than their
peers in district
schools,» he said.
Over the last
year, critical news articles from national newspapers like the New York Times and Washington Post have questioned the quality of education the company offers, pointing out overbilling for ineligible students in Colorado and a Pennsylvania
school where virtual students performed significantly worse
than their
public school peers.
In one study, voucher students did no better
than peers in the
public schools for four
years, then outpaced them in reading — but not math — in the fifth
year.
Though they are
public school students like any other, each
public charter
school student is given, on average, nearly $ 4,00 dollars less in
public operating support per
year than their
peers in traditional
public schools.
For the first time in at least 50
years, a majority of U.S.
public school students come from low - income families — meaning that more
than half of
public school kindergarten students enter the system already trailing their more privileged
peers.