Sentences with phrase «yet claim it does»

You worship the largest killer in history, who is planning on killing BILLIONS more of his supposed children yet you claim you don't hate?

He stated He is a Christian, but yet claims he doesn't claim the Christian God exists, and therefore is exempt from the burden of proof.

The fact remains that you have not proven your god exists and yet claim it does - that is arrogance.

Last year Mr We - Can «t - Make - Quality - AR - Glasses - Yet claimed we don't have the actual tech to make AR glasses that are any good.

Not exact matches

LinkedIn claims more than 500 million users, yet it does not disclose daily active user count or break out how many people are paying customers.

They claim they «do what's right for the customer,» yet in actual practice the bank had been creating millions of unauthorized bank and credit accounts without their customers knowing it since 2002.

Looking at the S&P Case - Shiller 20 city composite index as a sanity check no your fraudulent claim shows that since 2009 the index has only advanced 20 %, that means that on say a $ 500,000 your home equity due to appreciation would roughly be $ 100,000, so you would have to had put down close to $ 150,000 as a down payment, yet you did this on one income and you have kids and you make only $ 130,000 / year, sorry doesn't add up.

«In this second phase I am personally following very closely the property insurers that have not yet settled important and necessary claims for vital service sectors, and they can be sure that I will see this through, whatever the consequences may be, including suspending the authorization of the insurers to continue to do insurance business in Puerto Rico, until they have settled all outstanding claims.

Yet note what the memo does not claim: that Ohr had anything to do with the surveillance application on Carter Page.

Though we don't expect it just yet, a jump in new claims to about 20 % above year - ago levels (currently implying about 320,000 weekly new claims) would be indicative of a shift from «oncoming» to «commenced» recession.

Funny how IDers don't claim to be creationists, yet both have the EXACT same language and interpretation of evolutionary theory verbatim, go to the same church, watch the same videos, use the same arguments, vote for the same leaders, listen to the same pastors, and quote the same scripture, etc...

I agree with you, I have yet to see any of them post their claimed 5 laws of evolution as you asked for multiple times, nor have I heard of anything evolution said to back up it's claims to having done anything at all.

You are doing the very thing the bishops are doing yet claiming you are not.

Because many of you claimed you're atheists yet you know what God means to you also know bibles since many of you DID read it and know God and Jesus therefore you're not atheist but truly are agnostic because you all WANT proof that if God is existed or not..

I don't think we are doing that since not a single person yet is claiming to do that (this is your assumption of what you are hearing from others).

You attempted to claim that Humanists believe everyone is born good and yet that is not the case... your one quote proves nothing and certainly doesn't cover all humanists, that is painting with a broad brush - something Christians scream and whine about having done to them.

And yet while doing so, he claims his fashionable colleagues are too heavy handed in critiquing Rome.

@Kenrick Benjamin: «Vic - Don't worry atheist will tell you that they are ignorant as to whence the came and yet still claim that God don't exist.»

They claim it's a life changing experience, that their god is so powerful yet history has repeatedly shown it does no such thing because let's face it if they truly followed the teachings of their Christ, this world and specifically America would be a very different place.

Two comments.One, the atheist / materialist claims that he / she... «Did «nt believe in free will»... O.K.Should we take that to mean some mindless, heretofore unknown force apllied those words in your behalf?Did someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyonDid «nt believe in free will»... O.K.Should we take that to mean some mindless, heretofore unknown force apllied those words in your behalf?Did someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyonDid someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyondid you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyone).

'' Don't worry atheist will tell you that they are ignorant as to whence the came and yet still claim that God don't exist.»

You want to claim that those people who murdered the natives were not «informed» by their Christianity and were just «people» and yet you want to claim that any atheist who commits evil is doing so BECAUSE of their atheism.

You do risk just falling into an argument from ignorance, by claiming God fills the Gaps we don't know yet.

Yet people DO claim that God is morally perfect, but clearly he didn't stop the Holocaust.

No man has this ability, yet the atheist claims he does.

No man has this ability, yet the christian claims he does.

Yet these coincidences do completely vitiate the claim that science has shown life and man to be mere accidents.

Whether or not one thinks it best to start where the Shorter Catechism starts (and I do not), its claim is easy to understand, and yet it is also a profound summary claim of the goal of human life.

It's like a small scared child in a dark room claiming there is some monster out there in the darkness so you turn on the lights to show him there is no monster, but he just get's more scared claiming the monster must have hid in the closet or under the bed or anywhere you havn't yet looked, and when you do look and show them nothing is there it doesn't make them relieved, they get more upset because they now believe the monster is super fast or invisible or can teleport, because they know it's there, they can just feel it!

Yet against this claim it could be urged that it vainly does with more mental entities what may equally satisfactorily be done with fewer — that the panpsychist multiplies beyond necessity the features considered generic to all entities.

Yes, I understand that quantum entanglement is not actually showing anything moving faster than the speed of light, or moving at all for that matter, but it does show how little we truly understand about how both space - time and physics and quantum physics behave so if we are making a claim based on a predictor we don't yet understand then there is virtually no chance we might be correct in our hypothesis.

Seems to me you claimed a few articles back that you had definitive proof yet I don't recall seeing same.

check out Albert Fish, he is a devoted christian who beat, killed, and ate people — yet he claims to have done it all in the name of god — he wasn't insane — he was even proven to be sane by a panel of doctors!!!

He's simply pointing out inconsistencies among those who claim to follow Jesus yet don't follow all his teachings.

True - we don't yet understand how the first cells self - replicated, but we don't go off and make outlandish claims about how that happened either.

Yet he was also aware, in a way that many post-moderns are not, that no one can completely break with the past; any claim that one has done so is illusory.

Some people here have proclaimed that «we don't know» how the cosmos came into being yet they make claims to a «singular» Big Bang «theory» to justify their scientific outlook... Whenever a theist says that God instilled to Big Bang, the atheists all say, «Where then did God come from»?

They do eveything that Jesus condemned while on earth, yet they claim to follow him.

6 If we claim to have fellowship with him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live out the truth.

Yet he does not accept Barth's claim that all non-Christian religions are only idolatrous strivings after God.

Only Christianity's truth claim gives resources for realizing just how «out» and «bad» we are, yet doesn't leave us hopeless.

He claims he is for family values, yet he doesn't live it.

And your «unless you're open to the slightest possibility that you are indeed a space alien born a millisecond ago from another universe, then you are claiming something to be an absolute truth» I think the point was the likelihood — why do you not believe the space alien without proof yet believe in gods and angels without proof?

I have often argued that we ought to take the Pauline emphasis on the diversity of gifts and callings more seriously than we do — and yet I myself have sometimes attempted to claim more than my allotted share.

Yet such a claim, unless it is carefully restricted, implies both a prescience we do not have and a contradiction of Christian hope.

If he committed the crime, and in the same time claimed innocence by playing victim, using his race as a scapegoat, hoping to be set free, and yet put his faith in Christ... his sin could not be forgiven, becaue he did not confess it and acknowledge it publicly.

read your bible and history to learn how many heads was chopped at the hands of those who claim to be Christians, yet we do not blame Christianity.

How all this may be assembled and related to the traditional claims for Jesus is a task yet to be done thoroughly.

We don't know enough to make claims yet and it might very well be none of our business.

We do not have a set of «natural» goods and ends in which we can rest and be happy, we have only a supernatural end - «You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our hearts are restless till they rest in You» - and yet no creature can make a claim on God which obliges Him.