Sentences with phrase «yet know the meaning»

But when you're in second grade, you don't yet know the meaning of impossible.

Not exact matches

If you're using this type of broad - based approach, it's likely that you're going to be cold calling — meaning that people don't know you or trust you yet.

This mode lets you create your own Mushroom Kingdom, but we don't know what that means yet.

«You can talk with someone for years, everyday, and still, it won't mean as much as what you can have when you sit in front of someone, not saying a word, yet you feel that person with your heart, you feel like you have known the person for forever....

While Vivent SARL says it can collect these signals, it admits that no one really knows what they mean just yet.

«We're thinking a lot about what service means to Refinery29, to give you what you didn't yet know existed, from a perfect outfit to a beauty recommendation.»

This «no» actually means «maybe, just not yet.»

«I still have a daughter that's in high school that will be looking to go on to medical school, and now I'll know that I have an income that can support that and help her through it,» he said, adding that he doesn't know yet if the Carrier agreement will mean pay cuts for him and other employees.

What we know for sure is that the country's news media yet again has misread the meaning of a Canadian election.

And, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission claims to have oversight over digital currency derivatives — we're not entirely sure what that means quite yet for regulation, but it is good to know that maybe someone will be providing clarity on regulations soon (fingers crossed).

We don't know yet whether this price volatility will stop cryptocurrencies from catching on as a commonly used means of payment.

«We know we have more work yet to be done, but this is a historic step,» House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R - Tex.)

No, but you mean to tell me that we simply popped into existence out of nothing, simply from an involuntary shudder that magically happened in the middle of absolutely nothing and then slowly through the sheer force of will (or accident, or telepathy, science hasn't quiet made its mind up on that one yet) one little green gob of magic stuff morphed into humans.

Just because we don't yet know everything about the universe and its origins doesn't mean goddidit.

Jesus knew all that would happen - he tells the apostles things to come - Since Jesus in John 17 has not been arrested yet & Judas has not hung himself - the apostles regard Jesus» words about Judas to mean that Judas is to be doomed because of the betrayal — then they forget later on that Peter denied Christ — yet Peter WAS FORGIVEN!

What atheists say is that while we do not yet know and may never know what preceded the Big Bang, that does not mean a god must have done it.

Yet some of the most substantive theology being written by Baptist scholars today comes from a little - known circle of mostly younger moderates who have shown a surprising interest in quite traditional themes such as the deeper meaning of baptism and the Lord's Supper, the covenantal disciplines of congregational life, and the positive role of creeds and confessions in the life of the church.

Because many of you claimed you're atheists yet you know what God means to you also know bibles since many of you DID read it and know God and Jesus therefore you're not atheist but truly are agnostic because you all WANT proof that if God is existed or not..

Yet having encountered this fantastic tree with human features, readers can no longer look upon real trees as mere objects meant only for our manipulation.

Just because we don't yet know doesn't mean some sky fairy did it... Also why would a deity make the universe rate of expansion such that we could never travel to the end of it?

Two comments.One, the atheist / materialist claims that he / she... «Did «nt believe in free will»... O.K.Should we take that to mean some mindless, heretofore unknown force apllied those words in your behalf?Did someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyone).

And yet I think I know what was meant by that phrase: often God wears the face of our father or our mother first.

The church as yet hardly knows what it means to implement its renewed teaching of caring for creation.

It was said that «the best of defense is to attack»... --- Those allowed such to be signed knew all the time that this is what was going to happen because it happened repeatedly through out history from time of the crusaders but still they continued with signing it because it meant for them money pouring in for all involved with the trading on this issue which has spoiled the life of the Palestinians and all Arabs ever started war over those lands started with swords and horses that has developed into the present arms that we became to know and only God knows how future arms would look like in few de-ca-des or cen - tur - ies that are yet to come...?!

Yet such as it is — and the more certainly so, the more clearly we recognize just what the book is — it remains an extremely valuable document of primitive Western Christianity; though it by no means provides us with all we wish to know about the life and teaching of our Lord, or the life and teaching, activities, and beliefs, of the early church.

But the Bible asks us to have the courage displayed by the people of Israel — the courage of people who know full well what it means to be carnivores and yet who dream of a day — past and future — when lions will eat hay.

Just because I don't know yet doesn't mean I get to abandon all reason and think magic.

If the pastor has a keen awareness of what we have come to regard as the interpersonal hurt of his patient; knows the desperate and yet fatal need of the patient to evade further pain, no matter by what means, and often by striking out and hurting loved ones; feels something of the almost overwhelming and intolerable anxiety the patient experiences; is not too shaken by the terror evoked through what Kierkegaard expressed as «shut - up - ness unfreely revealed»; and can accept the consequent intense feelings of guilt and shame which isolate the patient from himself, from others and from God, then his ministry has within it the necessary element for a supportive and creative experience for the patient.

A quick about Abba Pambo — a contemporary of Origen: «If we asked [him] for a word from scripture or some other thing, he would not give us an answer right away but would say, «I haven't figured out the meaning of this word yet»... It normally happened that he spent two or three whole days, or a whole week without giving us an answer saying «if I do not know what sort of fruit this will bear, whether it is a fruit of death or life, I will not speak.»»

Yet I know that to say the wrong thing at any point will mean that all the logic and history can summon will go out my Gothic Window into the quadrangle, and Lord Zealous will slam the door.

You know this for a fact because?????? you say the bible is crap for saying these are signs, yet you just said you know what it means, taking the verse from the bible and interpreting it.

I KNOW God said it Himself... yet that does NOT mean GOD created the leviathan..

We do not know its author and it is now lost except as we have it in the excerpts Matthew and Luke took from it; yet it certainly once existed, and we call it «Q» from the German word Quelle, meaning source.

And yet we find ourselves in the strongest agreement with the German scholar, Professor von Rad, whom we have cited before, in his own expressed feeling that after all, legend is not an adequate term, so long as it is commonly understood simply as a mixture of history and unrestrained popular imagination (one part history, nine parts imagination — our comment, not his) We much better understand legend as a combination of history and meditation, and as motivated primarily by a concern to give expression to the meaning of history, as that meaning is conveyed by the faith that God makes himself known therein.12

I am an old nanny and yet have struggled with this passage, but I know in my heart that you have shared the simple truth of what Jesus meant.

The simple answer and honest one would be «We don't know yet», it doesn't mean a god gets to be plugged in to thee factor - that is blatant dishonesty and unless you provide evidence for a god there is no justification for believing it.

the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.

The American history boasts of the country being build on christian values, which obviously mean in the word of God, Gay unions are a definite big NO and yet looks like only a handful of true christian are there.

Spirit, then, is one of the categories which are fundamental for our knowledge of God, and yet which we hold as analogies and symbols, for we can never claim full understanding of them even as they apply to our being, nor can we assert that we know their full meaning in God.

However irreproachably I lived as a monk, I felt myself in the presence of God to be a sinner with a most unquiet conscience... I did not love, indeed I hated this just God... I raged with a fierce and most agitated conscience and yet I continued to knock away at Paul in this place, thirsting ardently to know what he really meant... At last I began to understand the justice of God as that by which the just man lives by the gift of God, that is to say by faith... At this I felt myself to have been born again and to have entered through open gates into paradise itself.6

And yet, the song can contrarily suggest that he would be wrong to adopt a dismissive attitude towards his love for her — no, it means something deep to him, and that could mean that the love is in some way right — what his apparently irrational eros is telling him is that she is capable of being complementary to him in some special way, and so he should stick it out.

While his charity is no doubt commendable, we are reluctant to accept the loss of yet another useful word, which is why we so strongly resist the idea that «Jesuitical» now means not very smart.

God is all knowing and all powerful and all good, yet allows evil to exist, which would either mean God is irresponsible or that he's incapable of stopping evil, which would mean that he's not actually all powerful afterall.

I mean we can't see a magnetic field yet we know is there... why?

In all things we will then come to know what it means to lose our life in Christ yet find our life in Christ, the full, spiritually sensitive, joyful, loving, life of grace in Christ.

What happens when this assumption is made is that what was once known as metaphor and as an approximation to meanings apprehended, yet deeper than our recognition of them, become manageable concepts and categories within the human framework of thought.

don't know how he does it yet, but that's what that means.

Before Jesus had yet died on the cross, Jesus told a paralysed man» your sins are forgiven ``, I presume that Jesus knew what He was talking about, meant what He said and it was in fact true.

-- born in a manger to a virgin (like the confused prophet had foretold in the inspired Septuagint he did not know yet existed in a passage that had nothing to do with the Messiah and in a poor translation of the Hebrew word «young women» into the Greek word for «virgin» which miraculously was what the Holy Spirit meant in the first place).

No, this straitness means rather that each must himself become an individual, that through this needle's eyes he must press forward to the narrow way where no comparison cools, but yet where no comparison kills with its insidious cooling.