Is it that the market has not
yet reached equilibrium?
Not exact matches
And
yet the Japanese will play to a draw with equanimity, content at the last simply to let go, so that all forces can
reach equilibrium, and I do not believe their version of the game is necessarily any less elegant or profound than ours.
The heat source may have
reached a constant temperature, but the Earth isn't necessarily at
equilibrium with the new warmer environment
yet.
ECS is a bogus concept, based on the late Cenozoic cooling following the closing of Tethys and the isthmus of Panama, the world keeps getting colder and colder, so we have not
reached the bottom
yet, indicating that there is no
equilibrium, just a pathway to the next bumper that bounces the climate the other way.
Clearly the earth's groundwater has
yet to
reach an
equilibrium with modern sea levels.
By dividing the total temperature change (as indicated by the best - fit linear trend) by the observed rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide content, and then applying that relationship to a doubling of the carbon dioxide content, Loehle arrives at an estimate of the earth's transient climate sensitivity — transient, in the sense that at the time of CO2 doubling, the earth has
yet to
reach a state of
equilibrium and some warming is still to come.
The paleo record is not at all ambiguous: as temperature rose in response to natural increases in insolation more GHGs were released into the atmosphere (mainly CO2, CH4, and H2O), and then those GHGs induced
yet more warming, which released
yet more GHGs, etc., until
equilibrium — and a warmer climate — was
reached.
Today we're just skipping that first natural warming step by injecting GHGs directly into the atmosphere, which is already inducing warming, which will result in
yet more GHGs being released naturally, etc., until
equilibrium — and a warmer climate — is
reached.